Culture and authority
Sannikov S. —
Conceptual approaches to examination of the phenomenon of power in semiotics of culture: retrospective methodological overview
// Man and Culture.
– 2018. – ¹ 2.
– P. 20 - 29.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8744.2018.2.25821 URL: https://en. nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=25821
Read the article
This article attempts to fill the gap associated with the insufficient knowledge on the existing approaches to examination of the phenomenon of power within the framework of semiotics of culture. The subject of the research is the cognitive problems of examination of the phenomenon of power in the works of representatives of the Western European School of semiotics of culture and relevant conceptual approaches to their solution. The object is the oeuvres of the classics specialized in semiotics of culture (semiology) of the XX century: E. Cassirer, R. Barthes, M. Foucault, J. Derrida, G. Deleuze, and J. Baudrillard. Methodological pivot from the positivist paradigm, within the framework of which “power” was studies as a political legal institution, towards postmodernist interpretation of power as a global system of the formation of reality, category of knowledge, and overall subordination to the discursive practices led to substantial expansion of methodological boundaries of the studies of the phenomenon of power. Power becomes an object of research in the context of broad range of disciplines, such as philosophy, history, sociology, linguistics, political anthropology, and culturology. In the conditions of such significant disciplinary diversity, special meaning attains the semiotics of culture as a methodological foundation for further disciplinary synthesis. The conducted analysis allowed detecting the key cognitive issues in examination of the phenomenon of power within the framework of the oeuvres of the indicated authors, and specify the relevant conceptual approaches to their solution. The result explicated the methodological prerequisites for emergence of the modern discipline of the semiotics of culture, which is capable of becoming a theoretical foundation for further analysis of the semiotic algorithms of power relations.
Deleuze, Derrida, Foucault, Barthes, Cassirer, political imagology, semiotics of power, cultural semiotics, Baudrillard, Poinsot
O’Neil Spady J. Reconsidering Theory: Power, the Learning Body, and Cultural Change during Early American Colonization // Journal of Early American History 1 (2011). P.191-214.
Murphy J.B. Nature, Custom, and Stipulation in the Semiotic of John Poinsot.-1991-Semiotica 83 (1-2):33-68.
Keenan T. The “Paradox” of Knowledge and Power: Reading Foucault on a Bias // Political Theory, 1987. Vol. 15, ¹1. P. 5-37.
Foucault M. Histoire de la sexualité. T.I: La volonté de savoir, Paris, 1976.
Dreyfus H. Being and Power: Heidegger and Foucault // International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 1996. Vol. 4, ¹1. P. 1-16.
Ding E. 2010. “Cassirer in the Context of Saussurean Semiotics.” Chinese Semiotic Studies 3: 56–67. doi: 10.1515/css-2010-0107.
Barthes R. Rhétorique de l'image // Communication, n°4, 1964.
Barthes R. Le mythe, aujourd'hu // Barthes R. Mythologies. P.: Seuil, 1957. P.179-233.
Ahonen P. Semiotic aspects of political science: Political semiotics (Semiotische Aspekte de