Fetisova E.E. —
About the latent existence of “Paris Note: the “Ark”
// Philosophical Thought.
– 2017. – ¹ 1.
– P. 75 - 85.
DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2017.1.21765 URL: http://en. nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=21765
Read the article
The subject of this research is the phenomenon of “Russian Renaissance” as a little-studied cultural paradigm of the XX century, its history and philosophical core – the “Paris Note”. This article illustrates the distinctive features of “Paris Note” and poets, who had similar to it perception of the world. The author analyzes the foundation of the “Paris Note”, as well as concept, poetry of symbolism, neoclassicism, and acmeism. The work also examines the “synchronic-reminiscent chronotope, by the virtue of which was created the genre polyphony alongside the “monologue on polyphonic basis”. For the purpose of revelation of the content of neo-acmeism as an artistic direction of the XX century, the author attracts the peculiarities of its functionality in external communication with symbolism, which transformed into its latent phase in 1934, and neoclassicism. Comparative analysis along with the method of semiotic reconstruction of a poetic text, serve as the key towards understanding of the internal structure of neo-acmeist cultural paradigm. Neo-acmeism in emigration continued the mission of symbolism: “duality of the world”, concept of the world as “aesthetic phenomenon” transforms into the principle of mystical energetism, cognizing the noumenal world through the “mystical revelation”. Emigrant neo-acmeism is determined as the synthesis of elements of modernism and realism: its poetry combines the mystical worlds, “real-irreal” dichotomy, symbolic “doctrine of correspondences”, and clarity, historical specificity inherent from realism. The conclusion is made that neo-acmeism (“Russian Renaissance”) in its structure contains a so-called converging mental code of the Russian culture, which connects the diverse poets within the framework of a single literary movement. Such way of examination of neo-acmeism as the continuous paradigm of post-symbolic traditionalistic creative work, as well as one of the important lines of literary development that combines the domestic and foreign experience, contributes into determination of the inner wholeness of Russian literature, which develops within the dialogue of various artistic systems (symbolism, acmeism, and neoclassicism).
Emigration, Motherland, Neoclassicism, Poetry, Synchronic-reminiscent chronotope , Acmeism, Symbolism, Literary direction, Russian Renaissance, Neo-acmeism
Prismanova A. Kovcheg: Poeziya pervoy emigratsii / Sost., avt. predisl. i komment. V. Kreyd. M.: Politizdat, 1991. 511 s.
Kolobaeva L.A. Russkiy simvolizm. M.: MGU, 2000. 296 s.
Gumilev N.S., Khodasevich V.F., Ivanov G.V. Stikhi. Proza. M.: Olimp; AST, 2000. 576 s.
Kovcheg: Poeziya pervoy emigratsii / Sost., avt. predisl. i komment. V. Kreyd. M.: Politizdat, 1991. 511 s.
Russkaya literatura 1920-1930-kh godov. Portrety poetov: V 2 t. / Sost. A.G. Gacheva, S.G. Semenova. T. 2. M.: IMLI RAN, 2008. 1024 s.
Zaytsev V.A. Russkaya poeziya KhKh veka: 1940-1990-e gody: Ucheb. posobie. M.: MGU, 2001. 264 s.
Kommentarii // Kovcheg: Poeziya pervoy emigratsii / Sost., avt. predisl. i komment. V. Kreyd. M.: Politizdat, 1991. 511 s.