Question at hand
Kotkovskiy L.E. —
To the question of correlation between legal and juridical responsibility
// National Security.
– 2018. – є 4.
– P. 1 - 7.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0668.2018.4.26071 URL: https://en. nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=26071
Read the article
The subject of this research is substantiated by the scientific views on legal and juridical responsibility presented in the Russian legal literature, which in most cases, does not demarcates these concepts and uses them as synonyms. The formulation of questions of legal liability is conducted in the context of consideration of the issues of juridical responsibility. The author analyzes the correlation between legal and juridical responsibility, reflecting the conceptual ideas of natural law and legal state; covers the theoretical reasoning on the problems of identification of the legal and juridical responsibility in connection with such phenomena as law, types of legal consciousness, social responsibility, positive and negative behavior; develops various models of legal and juridical responsibility, revealing their similarities and differences; determines the peculiarities, features, and spheres of practical implementation of the legal and juridical responsibility. The scientific novelty lies in proving the need for distinguishing legal responsibility from juridical. The following conclusions were made in the course of this research: legal responsibility is a structural elements of law as the social institution, for of social responsibility, doctrinal model that can be applies in academic pursuit and lawmaking process; juridical responsibility is a normative model that enshrined in the formal legal sources, has a discernible structure, and is an element of the professional, practical legal activities.
legal understanding, object of law, subject of law, regulatory model, doctrinal model, responsibility, act, law, legal responsibility, social responsibility
Vetrova, G.N. Ugolovno-protsessual'naya otvetstvennost' / G.N. Vetrova.-M: Nauka, 1987.
Polyakov, A.V. K ponyatiyu sub'ekta prava // Postklassicheskaya ontologiya prava: monografiya / pod red. I. L. Chestnova.-SPb.: Aleteyya, 2016. Ц C. 561-684.
Matuzov, N.I. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik / N.I. Matuzov, A.V. Mal'ko.-M.: Yurist', 2004.
Kudryavtsev, V.N. Pravo i povedenie / V.N. Kudryavtsev.-M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1978.
Vitruk, N.V. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti / N.V. Vitruk.-M.: Norma, 2009.
Vitruk, N.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie v Rossii (1991-2001 gg.): ocherki teorii i praktiki / N.V. Vitruk.-M.: Gorodets, 2001.
Kudryavtsev, V.N. O pravoponimanii i zakonnosti // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo.-1994. є 3. Ц C. 3-8.
Grafskiy, V.G. O nepreodolennykh trudnostyakh v sozdanii integral'noy yurisprudentsii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava.-2017. є 7.-S. 19-24.
Leyst, O.E. Metodologicheskie problemy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti: problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava / O.E. Leyst.-M.: Prospekt, 1999