Legal and political thought
Vinokurov S.N. —
The role of good faith in relational contracts in common law countries
// Law and Politics.
– 2019. – ¹ 1.
– P. 1 - 10.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2019.1.28691 URL: https://en. nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=28691
Read the article
The subject of this research is the role of good faith in relational contracts and the key aspects of the theory of relation contracts adopted in common law countries. The research relies on the case law of England, United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. On the example of case law, the author attempts to elucidate the content of requirements of good faith in relational contracts, as well as bring forth a hypothesis of recognition of requirements of good faith conduct as an implied obligation for relational contracts. Moreover, this work demonstrates court rulings of English courts rejecting the connection with requirement of good faith in relational contracts and expresses the opinion that the process of search for place and role of requirements of good faith conduct in relational contracts is still ongoing. The main conclusion of the conducted research is the determination of the role and content of good faith in relational contracts, as well as description of the key concepts of the theory of relational contracts. The author presents demonstrative examples of court rulings of the common law countries, which establish a connection between good faith and relational contract, and set requirements for good faith conduct as an implied condition for long-term relational contracts.
Canada, USA, England, precedent, law, relational, contract, good faith, New Zealand, Australia
S. Macaulay, Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study, American Sociological Review, 1963, Volume 28, ¹ 1. pp. 55 — 67.
I.R. Macneil, The Many Features of Contract, University of Southern California Law Review, Volume 47, 1974, p. 691.
I.R. Macneil, Relational Contract Theory: Challenges and Queries, 94 NW. U. L. REV., 2000, p. 881.
J.K. Setear, An Iterative Perspective on Treaties: A Synthesis of International Relations Theory and International Law, 1996, 37 Harv. Int'l L. J. 139, pp. 176–213.
A.B. Leichtling, Casenote: Scheck v. Burger King Corp.: Why Burger King Cannot Have Its Own Way With Its Franchisees, 1994, 48 U. Miami L. Rev., pp. 671, 682.
D.M. Rousseau, S.B. Sitkin, R.S. Burt and E. Camerer, Not So Different after All: A Cross-discipline View of Trust, et al., Academy of Management Review, 1998, Vol. 23., p. 395.
I.R. Macneil, Contracting Worlds and Essential Contract Theory, 2000, 9 S.&L., p. 431.
R. Austen-Baker, Comprehensive Contract Theory: A Four Nor