Skorobogatov Ya.O. —
Criteria for Differentiating Teaching Objectives in Blended Teaching
// Pedagogy and education. – 2017. – ¹ 3.
– P. 1 - 11.
Read the article
Review: The subject of the research is blended teaching as a form of education. The author of the article analyzes peculiarities and curriculum structure of teaching computer science to school students in blended teaching. One of the key points to be focused on when preparing such a course is a well organised system of teaching objectives. Skorobogatov introduces criteria for differentiating teaching obejctives in accordance with different cognitive difficulty levels (based on Tollingerova) and specific features of teaching situations. The author defines the obejctives of the first level that are to be achieved independently at home; general objectives of the second and third levels that are discussed when a student personally meets a teacher; and individual objectives that may be of the fourth or the fifth levels depending on a classroom teaching method chosen by a teacher (individual session, learning in pairs or in groups). The main research methods used by the author is the analysis of psychological-pedagogical, scientific methodological and special literature as well as articles and publications devoted to blended teaching and classification of teaching objectives. The author has also used the method of modelling when creating teaching objectives. The main conclusion of the research is the comparison of objectives with different cognitive levels to special features of teaching situations when teaching computer science to 7 - 11 grade students in the form of blended teaching. According to the author, this teaching activity contributes to a better knowledge in disciplines and development of such metadisciplinary competences as creative thinking, ability to self-assessment and communication ability.
Keywords: communication ability, cognitive functions, group teaching methods, objectives, classification of teaching objectives, automatic checkout system, blended teaching, teaching computer science at school, metadisciplinary competences, competence in self-education
Tarasova E. P. Klassifikatsiya uchebnykh zadach na osnove sistemno-strukturnogo analiza. Nauchnyy zhurnal: V mire nauchnykh otkrytiy, 2012. ISSN: 2072-0831. UDK 371.315.5 (str. 228-244)
Novyy slovar' metodicheskikh terminov i ponyatiy (teoriya i praktika obucheniya yazykam). — M.: Izdatel'stvo IKAR. E. G. Azimov, A. N. Shchukin. 2009. (448 s.)
Tollingerova D. «K psikhologicheskoy teorii uchebnykh zadach», Sotsialisticheskaya shkola, 1976/77, ¹4. (str. 156 — 160.)
Tollingerova D., Goloushova D., «Sostavlenie uchebnykh zadach zadannoy kognitivnoy trebovatel'nosti kak odno iz osnovnykh kommunikativnykh umeniy uchiteley», Psikhologiya proektirovaniya umstvennogo razvitiya detey, Rospedagentstvo, 1994g. (48 s.)
Distantsionnaya podgotovka po informatike [Elektronnyy resurs] http://informatics.mccme.ru/
Talyzina N.F. «Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya», Moskva, ACADEMIA, 2001g. (288 s.)
Razvitie kognitivnykh i tvorcheskikh sposobnostey uchashchikhsya na urokakh i vo vneurochnoy deyatel'nosti v usloviyakh litseya [Elektronnyy resurs] http://festival.1september.ru