Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1989,   Articles in work: 305 Declined articles: 758 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Concept and functions of law: temporal analysis
Malikov Sergey Vladimirovich

PhD in Law

Leading Scientific Associate, All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

123995, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Povarskaya, 25

s.v.malikov@yandex.ru

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the concept and functions of law. The goal of this work lies in determining the levels of interaction between time and law. The author examines the two levels of such interaction – external and internal. The first establishes the nature, concept, properties and functions of law, as well as its evolution in time (traced on the example of performance of the normative legal act). The second reveals the temporal tools used in law for regulating legal relations (for example, timeframes and terms). Special attention is given to the first of the aforementioned levels of interaction between time and law. As the main research method, the author applies the dialectical method of cognition. The author is first to attempt of interdependent examination of time and law for determining the concept of law and its functions. Framework is established for further research with consideration of the determined two level of interaction – external and internal, as well as the detailed examination of such categories as legal time, stability, inconsistency, continuity, dynamism, etc.

Keywords: Continuity of law, Stability of law, Statistical function of law, Dynamic function of law, Law in time, Temporal analysis, Functions of law, Concept of law, Law, Time

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2018.10.17647

Article was received:

20-01-2016


Review date:

21-01-2016


Publish date:

21-10-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Vladimirov Yu. S. Priroda prostranstva i vremeni: antologiya idei. M., 2015. 400 s.
2.
Berzhel' Zh.-L. Obshchaya teoriya prava. M., 2000. S. 198234.
3.
Malakhov V. P. Obshchaya teoriya prava i gosudarstva. K probleme pravoponimaniya. M., 2013. S. 3132.
4.
Chestnov I. L. Pravoponimanie v epokhu postmoderna // Pravovedenie. 2002. 2. S. 15.
5.
Rybakov V. A. Preemstvennost' v otechestvennom prave v perekhodnyi period: obshcheteoreticheskie voprosy: avtoref. dis. d-ra yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2009. S. 14.
6.
Stepanyan O. M. Obshchaya kharakteristika apriornoi sushchnosti prava // Bezopasnost' biznesa. 2007. 4. S. 29-35.
7.
Dubovitskaya O. N. Kategoriya sushchnost' prava i ee znachenie v yuridicheskoi nauke // XV Derzhavinskie chteniya. Institut prava: Materialy obshcherossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Fevral' 2010 g. Tambov: Izd. Dom TGU im. G.R. Derzhavina, 2010. S. 3439.
8.
Stovba A. V. O peremene sushchnosti ili chto est' pravo v epokhu postmetafiziki // Pravovedenie. 2008. 1. S. 157.
9.
Yavich L. S. Obshchaya teoriya prava. L., 1976. S. 39.
10.
Baitin M. I. Sushchnost' prava. Saratov, 2001. S. 64.
11.
Leist O. E. Sushchnost' prava. M., 2002. S. 25.