Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1989,   Articles in work: 305 Declined articles: 758 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Repressive and Punitive Nature of the Cancellation (Loss of Effect) of the Legal Act
Trofimova Galina Anatol'evna

Expert, Scientific Research Association "Legal Initiative"

664074 Russia, Irkutsk Oblast, Lermontova Street 8-1

TrofimovaGA2@mail.ru

 

 

Abstract.

Cancellation, termination, loss of effect, recognition as inconsistent with a prevailing legal act, recognition as inconsistent with the RF Constitution, abolishment a legal act is one of the important measures to restore law and order in the country, protect the rights and freedoms of citizens, and to ensure appropriate law power structures. However, there is no unambiguous interpretation of repressive and punitive application of such measures. The article is devoted to analysis of the legal nature of the measures on cancellation (loss of effect) of legal acts in terms of the possibility of their use as measures of responsibility. The methodology is based on materialist dialectic, in particular, the author has used general and special research methods such as logical analysis, formal law method and systems approach. As a result of the research, the author has analyzed two main procedures of cancellation (loss of effect) of the legal acts, administrative and judicial, describes their peculiarities and methods of defining repressive and punitive nature of the measure. The author also touches upon the problems that relate to the administrative or judicial procedure of termination (loss of effect) and offers relevant solutions. 

Keywords: impairing the moral rights, principle of subordination, normative legal act, legal act, independence of the judiciary, administrative discretion, accountability measures, termination, loss of effect, compliance assessment

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0595.2018.9.19742

Article was received:

23-07-2016


Review date:

18-07-2016


Publish date:

01-11-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Nekrasov S.I. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya otvetstvennost' sub''ektov vnutrifederativnykh otnoshenii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: spetsifika sostava konstitutsionnogo delikta, primenyaemykh sanktsii, klassifikatsii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2005. 8. S. 5-13.
2.
Sidel'nikov D.E., Grachev V.S., Gurbanov A.G., Kondrat I.N., Serov K.N. Klassifikatsiya mer konstitutsionno-pravovogo prinuzhdeniya, primenyaemykh za sovershenie konstitutsionnykh pravonarushenii // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2006. 4. S. 153-159.
3.
Davydova N. Yu. Konstitutsionno-pravovoe prinuzhdenie v mekhanizme obespecheniya zakonnosti deyatel'nosti organov i dolzhnostnykh lits mestnogo samoupravleniya. Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2011. 27 s.
4.
Avdeenkova M. P. Konstitutsionno-pravovye sanktsii i konstitutsionno-pravovaya otvetstvennost' // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2005. 7. S. 85-89.
5.
Bobrova N.A., Zrazhevskaya T.D. Otvetstvennost' v sisteme garantii konstitutsionnykh norm (gosudarstvenno-pravovye aspekty). Voronezh, 1985. 154 s.
6.
Lipinskii D.A., Musatkina A.A. O sanktsiyakh konstitutsionnoi otvetstvennosti i merakh zashchity // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. 12. S. 15-18.
7.
Lipinskii D.A. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti. Avtoref. dis. dokt. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2004. 48 s.
8.
Yaroshenko N.I. Konstitutsionno-pravovye sanktsii v sfere normotvorchestva // Voprosy pravovedeniya. 2013. 2. S. 188-195.
9.
Solov'ev S.G., Bashkov A.V. Priznanie munitsipal'nykh normativnykh pravovykh aktov utrativshimi silu libo nedeistvuyushchimi // Sovremennoe pravo. 2009. 10. S. 49-52.
10.
Rumyantsev P.A. Organy publichnoi vlasti i ikh konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost' // Vektor nauki Tol'yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki. 2010. 3. S. 178-181.
11.
Kolosova N.M. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost' v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Otvetstvennost' organov gosudarstvennoi vlasti i inykh sub''ektov prava za narushenie konstitutsionnogo zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii. M., 2000. 192 s.
12.
Kolosova N.M. K voprosu o konstitutsionnykh sanktsiyakh // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2009. 2. S. 12-18.
13.
Kondrashev A.A. Teoriya konstitutsionno-pravovoi otvetstvennosti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Avtoref. dis. dokt. yurid. nauk. M., 2011. S. 67.
14.
Baglai M.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Uchebnik. M., 2005. 816 s.
15.
Vinogradov V.A. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost': voprosy teorii i pravovoe regulirovanie. M. 2000. 287 s.
16.
Tsaliev A.M., Basiev M.S. Konstitutsionno-pravovaya otvetstvennost': sovremennoe sostoyanie i problemy sovershenstvovaniya). M.: Vladikavkaz, 2009. 172 s.
17.
Skifskii F.S. Otvetstvennost' za konstitutsionnye pravonarusheniya: Nauchnoe izdanie. Tyumen', 1998. 16 s.
18.
Kutafin O.E. Predmet konstitutsionnogo prava. M., 2001. 444 s.
19.
Luchin V.O. Konstitutsiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii. M., 2002. 687 s.
20.
Pugachev A.N. Konstitutsionno-pravovye sanktsii i ikh osobennosti // Problemy ukrepleniya zakonnosti i pravoporyadka: nauka, praktika, tendentsii. 2009. 1. S. 279-284.
21.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 6 oktyabrya 1999 goda 184-FZ Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii zakonodatel'nykh (predstavitel'nykh) i ispolnitel'nykh organov gosudarstvennoi vlasti sub''ektov RF (v red. ot 23.03.2016 66-FZ) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
22.
Lukon'kina O.V. Osnovaniya otmeny pravovykh aktov po zakonodatel'stvu Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Sotsial'no-politicheskie nauki. 2011. 1. S. 58-61.