Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2108,   Articles in work: 271 Declined articles: 914 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Precarious work (unstable employment) in the structure of the labour market in the region
Lobova Svetlana Vladislavl'evna

Doctor of Economics

Professor, the department of personnel management and socio-economic relations

656035, Russia, Altaiskii krai, g. Barnaul, pr. Lenina, 59

barnaulhome@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Abstract. The subject of research is the precarious work, which is low pay, insecurity, lack of protection (the worker becomes vulnerable to social risks such as unemployment and poverty), with connectivity defined by the suffering of workers. The object of the study is economically active population in Altai region at the age from 15 to 72 years in the context of assessing employment. The study aimed at finding answers to questions related to informal employment at the regional labour market: the determinants of prekarisierung employment, what jobs have the characteristics of pretaroli and what are the trends precarization component of the labor market of the Altai territory, in statistical measurements. The official statistical monitoring of the Russian precarious work is still not received. Although in fairness I should say that Rosstat monitors some indicators one way or another characterize the trend of precarious work, the analysis of which allows to argue about the status and trends prekarisierung employment in the labour markets of Russia and regions. Therefore, in search of answers to the above issues, the author proposes in identifying prekarisierung employment to consider the quality of jobs on the presence in them of signs of pretaroli evaluated through the prism of the criteria in the system of dichotomies "stability / instability" and "security / insecurity".The estimates of precarization in the labor market of the Altai region, the data sources for which was the results of dynamic statistical observations conducted by state statistical bodies, indicated a negative trajectory of change in the quality of jobs in the region and signs of precarization. The main contribution of the author in the development of the theme should be considered as an approach to the identification of precarious work in the structure of the labor market by assessing the quality of workers for the presence of signs of precarization, and the designation of the trajectory of change of job quality in the direction of precarization. In the formulation of generally accepted methodological approach to the identification of precarization in the structure of the regional labor market, unstable employment would have to obtain a quantitative assessment that would allow relevant authorities to develop measures on regulation of the investigated type of employment from the standpoint of obtaining maximum effects for both the employee and the employer.
Keywords: security vs insecurity, stability vs instability, signs of precarious work, Altai Krai, regional labour market, unstable employment, precarious work, criteria of precarious work, precariat, statistical observation
DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2017.5.21058
Article was received: 14-11-2016

Review date: 12-11-2016

Publish date: 04-06-2017

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here.

References
1.
Fedorova A.E., Dvorzhakova Z., Katashinskikh V.S. Otsenka izmenenii v cotsial'no-trudovykh otnosheniyakh: sravnitel'nyi mezhstranovyi analiz // Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii. – 2016. – № 1 (199). – S. 124-134.
2.
Golenkova Z.T., Goliusova Yu.V. Novye sotsial'nye gruppy v sovremennykh stratifikatsionnykh sistemakh global'nogo obshchestva // Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial'naya praktika. – 2013. – №
3.
– S. 5–15. 3.Matveeva T.A. Vliyanie neustoichivosti zanyatosti na trudovye dokhody rossiiskikh rabotnikov i na ikh udovletvorennost' trudom // Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii. – 2014. – №3 (193). – S.56-68.
4.
Gasyukova E.N. Prekarizatsiya: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya, faktory i otsenki. Mir i Rossiya // Problemnyi analiz i gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoe proektirovanie. – 2015. – Tom 8. – № 6 (44). – S. 28-46.
5.
Veredyuk O.V. Neustoichivost' zanyatosti: teoreticheskie osnovy i otsenka masshtabov v Rossii // Vestnik SPbGU. Ser. 5. – 2013. – № 1. – S.25-32.
6.
Cherkasova M.S. Prekariat i prekarizatsiya zanyatosti: real'nost' ili nauchnyi konstrukt // APRIORI. Ceriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. – 2015. –№ 3. – S. 69-78.
7.
Standing G. Work after Globalization. Building Occupational Citizenship. Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA, USA. Edgar Elgar : book review // Nordic journal of working life studies. – 2014. – Pp. 75-80.
8.
Golenkova Z.T., Goliusova Yu.V. Rossiiskii prekariat: formirovanie novoi sotsial'noi straty // Sotsial'nye innovatsii v razvitii trudovykh otnoshenii i zanyatosti v XXI veke / Pod obshchei red. prof. Z.Kh. Saralievoi. – N. Novgorod: Izdatel'stvo NISOTs, 2014. – S. 86-89.
9.
Golenkova Z.T., Goliusova Yu.V. Prekariat kak novaya gruppa naemnykh rabotnikov // Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii. – 2015. – № 1 (195). – S. 47-57.
10.
Toshchenko Zh.T. Prekariat – novyi sotsial'nyi klass // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. – 2015. – № 6. – S. 3-13.
11.
Shkaratan O.I., Karacharovskii V.V., Gasyukova E.N. Prekariat: teoriya i empiricheskii analiz (na materialakh oprosov v Rossii, 1994–2013) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. – 2015. – №
12.
– S.99-110. 12.Atkinson J. Manpower Strategies for Flexible Organizations // Personnel Management. – 1984. – August.
13.
Kalleberg A. Nonstandard Employment Relations: Part-time, Temporary and Contact Work // Annual Review of Sociology. – 2000. – Vol.26. – P. 341-365.
14.
Lobova S.V. Ustoichivost' cheloveka v organizatsionnoi srede: operatsionalizatsiya ponyatiya i obzor issledovatel'skikh napravlenii // Trendy i upravlenie. – 2016. – № 1. – S. 5-22.
15.
Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe polozhenie Altaiskogo kraya. 2015 god. Stat. dokl. / Territorial'nyi organ Federal'noi sluzhby gosudarstvennoi statistiki po Altaiskomu krayu. – Barnaul, 2016. – 156 s.
16.
Paugam S. Die Herausforderung der organischen Solidarität durch die Prekarisierung von Arbeit und Beschäftigung / R.Castel, K.Dörre (Hg.) Prekarität, Abstieg, Ausgrenzung. Die soziale Frage am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. – Frankfurt am Main/New York, 2009. – P.175-196.
17.
Sizova L.I. Prekarizatsiya v trudovoi sfere Rossii // Peterburgskaya sotsiologiya segodnya – 2015: cbornik nauchnykh trudov Sotsiologicheskogo instituta RAN. — Vyp. 6. — SPb.: NestorIstoriya, 2015. – S. 122-158.
18.
Gimpel'son V.E., Kapelyushnikov R.I. Normal'no li byt' neformal'nym? // Ekonomicheskii zhurnal VShE. – 2013. – №1. – S. 3-15.
19.
Vas'kina Yu.V. Zarabotnaya plata i uroven' zhizni rabotnikov promyshlennosti Povolzh'ya // Peterburgskaya sotsiologiya segodnya. – 2015.– № 6. – S. 236-265.
20.
Trud, zanyatost' i chelovecheskoe razvitie. Doklad o razvitii chelovecheskogo potentsiala v Respublike Bashkortostan / pod obshch. red. R.M. Valiakhmetova, G.R. Baimurzinoi, N.M. Lavrenyuk. – Ufa: Vostochnaya pechat', 2015. – 360 s.