Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2160,   Articles in work: 281 Declined articles: 942 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Medieval tradition of archetypal research of the public authority organization
Mamychev Aleksei Yur'evich

Professor, the department of Theory and History of Russian and Foreign Law, Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service

690014, Russia, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, Gogolya Street 41, office #5501

mamychev@yandex.ru
Filippova Mariya Konstantinovna

Assistant, the department of Theory and History of Russian and Foreign Law, Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service

690014, Russia, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, Gogolya Street 41, office #5501

buharina-masha@mail.ru
Abstract. The subject of this research is the medieval political legal thought, within the framework of which have developed the archetypal (divine) ideas, as well as the antique perceptions about the “arche” (initial foundation, proto-idea, etc.) as a deep foundation of the public authority organization and value-normative system. The article demonstrates that the medieval though has formed two axial lines of evolution of the archetypal research: first one is associated with the highest arche-ideas, initial principles, divine concepts, etc.; second one, on the contrary, is associated with the purely human, material measurement of an archetype – archaic heritage, unconscious structures of mentality, collective ideas, initial outrage and "cultural amnesia" of the sources of sociopolitical and legal cultural integrity, as well as particular political legal institutions. The theoretical methodological basis of this research consists in the experience in world history of state and law, positions of juridical anthropology, and cultural-historical approach applied on legal studies and political science. The scientific novelty of this work lies in the author’s interpretation of the medieval tradition of archetypal research. The article reveals and substantiates a unique tradition that in conceptually framed by the medieval theologians and associated with perceiving an archetype as simultaneously final and initial “point of harmonization” of the volitional, cognitive, and spiritual powers. This aspect depicts the ideative character of interpretation of the archetypal foundations. Archetype “originates” the crucially new dimension, forms the “point of convergence”, or the “way of ascension” to the uniform, universal. The article also substantiate that the idea of archetypal foundations as a descriptive discourse became dominant in the era of Renaissance and Reformation, as well as significantly influences the establishment of the theory of Jungian archetypes. The novelty also implies the characterization of the formed in Medieval Times tradition of examination of the positive law in instrumental aspect, in other words, as a necessary institutionally normative form that ensures manifestation and presence of the highest values and norms within the public authority organization, including forcing the members of community to follow the highest principles and ideals.  
Keywords: theology, Middle Ages, public authority organization, legal culture, right, state, archetype, evolution, legal thinking, political doctrines
DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2017.6.21163
Article was received: 27-11-2016

Review date: 22-11-2016

Publish date: 16-06-2017

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here.

References
1.
Firsov N.N. Mif v rossiiskom politicheskom diskurse 90-kh gg. KhKh veka. (Na materialakh i dokumentakh politicheskikh partii i dvizhenii). M., 2005. 113 c.
2.
Zhirar R. Veshchi, sokrytye ot sozdaniya mira. M.: Izdatel'stvo BBI, 2016. 518 c.
3.
Malenko S.A. Fenomenologiya arkhetipa v sisteme sotsiokul'turnogo osvoeniya kollektivnogo bessoznatel'nogo (na materialakh tvorchestva K.G. Yunga). Avtoref. diss… kand. filos. Nauk. K., 1998. C. 5-7.
4.
Marinosyan T.E. Arkhetip kak ponyatie filosofskoi antropologii. Avtoref… kand. fil. nauk. M., 1998. C. 9.
5.
Storchak V.M. Arkhetip i mental'nost' v kontekste religiovedeniya. Avtoref. diss… kand. filos. nauk. M., 1997. C. 6.
6.
Meletinskii E.M. Poetika mifa. M., 2012. 331 c.
7.
Eliade M. Aspekty mifa. M., 2010. 251 c.
8.
Laza V.D. Arkhetipicheskoe v pravoslavii: istoriya i sovremennost'. Monografiya. Pyatigorsk, 2013. S. 9-56.
9.
Losev A. Istoriya antichnoi estetiki. Itogi tysyacheletnego razvitiya: V 2-kh t. M., 1992, 1994. T. 1. 832 s.
10.
Eliade M. Istoriya very i religioznykh idei: Ot Magomeda do Reformatsii. Izd. 2-e. M., 2009. 564 s.
11.
Ovchinnikov A.I., Mamychev A.Yu. Manastyrnyi A.V., Tyurin M.E. Yuridicheskie arkhetipy v pravovoi politike Rossii: monografiya. Izd-vo: YuFU, Rostov n/D, 2009. 320 s.
12.
Yung K.G. Instinkt i bessoznatel'noe [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.oculus.ru/stat.php?id=52 (data obrashcheniya 10.10.2016 g.)
13.
Tarnas S. Istoriya zapadnogo myshleniya. M., 1995. 448 s.
14.
Latur B. Peresborka sotsial'nogo: vvedenie v aktorno-setevuyu teoriyu. M., 2014. 384 s.
15.
Akvinskii F. Summa teologii. K., 2002. 560 s.
16.
Mamychev A.Yu., Fominskaya M.D., Shestopal S.S. Khristianskie paradigmy ucheniya o pravakh cheloveka. Lambert Academic Publishing, 2015. 340 s.
17.
Turkulets S.E. Vera kak dukhovnaya tsennost' v religioznom i pravovom soznanii // Tsennostnyi diskurs v naukakh i teologii // Ros. akad. nauk, In-t filosofii, Ros. gos. gumanitar. un-t. M., 2009. S. 330-351.
18.
Solov'ev V.S. Pravo i nravstvennost'. Mn., 2001. 192 s.
19.
Istoriya filosofii prava/ Pod red. Kerimova D.A. SPb., 1998. 634 s.
20.
Bart K. Opravdanie i pravo. M., 2006. 150 s.
21.
Dugin A.G. Filosofiya politiki. M., 2004. 424 s.
22.
Dugin A.G. Postfilosofiya. Tri paradigmy v istorii mysli. M., 2009. 744 s.
23.
Bocharnikov I.V. Fenomen patriotizma v mirovoi politicheskoi istorii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2013. № 4. C. 513-518. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9271.
24.
Shelomentsev V.N. Formirovanie zakonodatel'stva i evolyutsiya vzglyadov rossiiskikh uchenykh po problemam sootnosheniya gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva v pervoi chetverti XX veka // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2012. № 3. C. 49-58.
25.
Demetradze M.R. Vertikal'no-voskhodyashchaya strategiya i gorizontal'no-niskhodyashchie protsessy perekhodnogo perioda. Institutsional'nye i neinstitutsional'nye protsessy modernizatsii // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2016. № 2. C. 197-202. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2016.2.17192.
26.
Gulyaikhin V.N. Agenty pravovoi sotsializatsii cheloveka // Pravo i politika. 2012. № 1. C. 143-149.
27.
Petyukova O.N. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya gosudarstvenno-konfessional'nykh otnoshenii v nauke administrativnogo prava na sovremennom etape // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2015. № 8. C. 762-768. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.8.16115.
28.
Glisin A.F. Tendentsii razvitiya potentsiala nauki v Rossii // Trendy i upravlenie. 2016. № 4. C. 327-341. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2016.4.20284.
29.
Dobrynin N.M. Kratkii ocherk o sud'be rossiiskogo konstitutsionalizma: o sushchnosti, evolyutsii i neotlozhnosti konstitutsionnoi reformy // Pravo i politika. 2013. № 12. C. 1737-1752. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.12.10142.