Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2038,   Articles in work: 265 Declined articles: 863 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Criticizing the Concept of 'State as an Involuntary Creditor of an Insolvent Taxpayer'
Izvekov Stanislav Sergeevich

lecturer of the Department of Financial Law at Ural State Law University

620075, Russia, Sverdlovsk Region, Yekaterinburg, Gorky's str., 31, of. 3

ss.izvekov@gmail.com

 

 
Abstract. The article is devoted to the question about whether it is advisable for the legislator to use the concept 'state as an involuntary creditor of an insolvent taxpayer' to improve the taxation regime when a company is bankrupt. Today's economic situation forces the government to undertake measures aimed at finding new sources of budget replenishment from corporate tax revenues when a company faces insolvency or insufficiency of assets. The author of the article analyzes prerequisites for state tax requirements taking a priviliged order in the list of credit requirements as well as studies 'pro and con' arguments. The task set forth by the author of the article is achieved through using methods and techniques of historical and international comparative law as well as systems analysis of the legislation and research literature on the matter published in the foreign states. The article may be of interest not only because it raises questions about bankruptcy but also covers issues of comparative and international law. The article gives a reader an insight into competitive legislation of Britain, British colonies and some other countries. As a result of the research, the author makes thesises that oppose to the introduction of the concept of 'state as an involuntary creditor of an insolvent taxpayer' in the Russian bankruptcy law. The author also makes recommendations on how to improve current bankruptcy law of the Russian Federation and to satisfy financial interests of the state without changing the order of credit requirement fulfilment. 
Keywords: priority of claims, register of creditors, authorized agency, insolvency, bankruptcy, tax, involuntary creditor, taxpayer, liquidation, discharge
DOI: 10.25136/2409-7802.2017.4.21278
Article was received: 01-12-2016

Review date: 06-12-2016

Publish date: 16-01-2018

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here.

References
1.
A Review Of Company Rescue And Business Reconstruction Mechanism 1(b).
2.
Agustin Berdeja-Prieto, Debt Collateralization and Business Insolvency: A Review of the Mexican Legal System, in Multinational Commercial Insolvency, at O-9 (1993).
3.
Alain David, Preferences of the Tax Authorities and Bankruptcy Law in France, in Corporate Insolvency and Rescue: The International Dimension 221, 227 (Dennis Campbell and Anthony E. Collins eds., 1993).
4.
American Law Institute, Transnational Insolvency Project, International Statement Of Mexican Bankruptcy Law 97 (Tentative Draft 1998).
5.
Asian Development Bank, Report on the Results of The Technical Assistance (http://www.insolvencyasia.com). Asia-Pacific Restructuring and Insolvency Guide 2003/2004 (http://www.asianrestructuring.com).
6.
Bankruptcy Act (January 22, 2003; effective January 1, 2004).
7.
Bankruptcy Act and to amend the Income Tax Act, ch. 27, 1992 S.C. 559 (Can.). Income Tax Act, ch. 12, 1997 S.C. (Can.).
8.
Barbara K. Day. National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges American Bankruptcy Law Journal, Fall, 2000. 74 Am. Bankr. L.J. 461. (https://www.iiiglobal.org/sites/default/files/barbara%20day%20sovereign.pdf).
9.
BH Swart, Die rol van.n concursus creditorum in die Suid-Afrikaanse insolvensiereg (1980) (doctoral thesis).
10.
Carlos Sanchez-Mejorada, Remarks at The American Law Institute, Seventy-Seventh Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., May 16, 2000.
11.
Christoph G. Paulus, The New German Insolvency Code, 33 tex. int'l L.J. 141, 144 (1998).
12.
Code General Des Impots, art. 1929 ter.
13.
Codigo Fiscal de la Federación, D.O., (December 31, 1981), art. 149.
14.
Companies Act, 1993 (N.Z.).
15.
Corporations Law, 1993, pt. 5.4 (Austl.). Bankruptcy Act, . 33 of 1966 (Austl.).
16.
Customs and Excise Act, 1966, pt. IVA (N.Z.).
17.
David Lacey. Preferential Claims of Government in English Insolvency Proceedings, In Corporate Insolvency And Rescue: The International Dimension (Dennis Campbell and Anthony E. Collins eds., 1993).
18.
Douglas G. Baird, The Elements of Bankruptcy 86 (1992).
19.
Fancy Chepkemoi Too. A Comparative Analysis Of Corporate Insolvency Laws: Which Is The Best Option For Kenya? A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements of Nottingham Trent University for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 2015 (https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/42393304.pdf)
20.
First Australian Law Reform Commission, Report 45, General Insolvency Inquiry 734, at 299 (1988) (Austl.)
21.
Fisheries Act, 1983, 107K(3) (N.Z.).
22.
Goods and Services Tax Act, 1985, pt. III (N.Z.).
23.
House Comm. On The Judiciary, to accompany H.R. 8200, H.R. rep. . 95-595, at 190 (1977), reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5963, 615.
24.
Ian f. Fletcher, The Law Of Insolvency 293 (2d ed. 1996).
25.
Income Tax Act, 1994, pts. IX, IX, X, and XI (N.Z.).
26.
Insolvency Act, 1967 (N.Z.).
27.
Insolvency Act, 1986, c. 45 (Eng.)
28.
Insolvenzordnung, v. 5.10.1994 (BGBl. I S.2866). (translated in Charles E Sewart, Isolvency Code, Act Introducing The Insolvency Code (1997)) (F.R.G.). Abgabenordnung (Federal Fiscal Code).
29.
Jacob S. Ziegel, Canada's Phased-In Bankruptcy Law Reform, 70 AM. BANKR. L.J. 383, 409 (1996).
30.
Klaus Kamlah, The New German Insolvency Act: Insolvenzordnung, 70 AM. BANKR. L.J. 417, 420 (1996), at 434
31.
Law 84-148 of March 1, 1984, effective March 1, 1985; and Law 85-89, subject to Decree Nos. 85-1388 and 85-1389 of December 27, 1985. Amendments were enacted in 1994. Law 94-475 of June 10, 1994.
32.
Law 84-148 of March 1, 1984. Law 85-89, subject to Decree Nos. 85-1388 and 85-1389 of December 27, 1985. Law 94-475 of June 10, 1994.
33.
Legal Department, International Monetary Fund, Orderly & Effective Insolvency Procedures: Key Issues VII (1999). (http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/orderly/index.htm).
34.
Ley de Concursos Mercantiles, D.O. (May 12, 2000).
35.
Ley de Quiebras y Suspension de Pagos, D.O. (April 20, 1943) (translated in 1 Mexican Law Library Commercial Codes, Business And Commercial (William D. Signet, ed. 1997)).
36.
Livre Des Procedures Fiscales, art. L262, L263.
37.
Lopez-Ibor, Rocio Albert & Artes-Caselles, Joaquin, Bankruptcy Proceedings and Government: Should Bankruptcy Law Grant Privileges to the Treasury, Volume 2003 German working Papers In Law And Economics, Paper 9 (http://www.bepress.com/gwp).
38.
Magna Carta (Confirmed version), 9 Henr. III, 1225, C.18.
39.
Malcolm Rowat & Jose Astigarraga, Latin American Insolvency Systems, A Comparative Assessment, World Bank Technical Paper . 433, at 66 (1999).
40.
Malcolm Rowat & Jose Astigarraga, ukaz. soch., at 65. Francisco Romero, The New Proposed Mexican Bankruptcy Law 26-27 (Paper delivered at the American Bankruptcy Institute 2000 Annual Spring Meeting) (April 29, 2000).
41.
Manfred Balz, The European Convention on Insolvency Proceedings, 70 AM. BANKR. L.J. 485, 491 n.23 (1996).
42.
Manuel E. Tron, The Mexican Tax System, in 2 Mexican Law Library Commercial Codes, Tax 747, 749 (William D. Signet, ed. 1997).
43.
New Zealand Law Commission, Study Paper 2, Priority Debts In The Distribution Of Insolvent Estates. 98, at 30 (1999).
44.
Patrick Serlooten, le Tresor Public, Creancier de l'Entreprise en Difficulte (The Public Treasury, Creditor of the Financially Troubled Company), in . 1-2 La Semaine Juridique Entreprises Et Affaires 24, 26 (Jan. 6, 2000).
45.
Philip R.Wood, Principles Of International Insolvency 4-7 (1995).
46.
Radiocommunications Act, 1989, 183(4) (N.Z.).
47.
Receiverships Act, 1993 (N.Z.).
48.
Report of the Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy and Insolvency 79 (1986) (Can.).
49.
Report Of The Commission On The Bankruptcy Laws Of The United States, H.R. doc. . 93-137, at 216 (1st sess. 1973), reprinted in B Collier on Bankruptcy, app. pt. 4(c), at 484 (15th ed. rev. 1999).
50.
Report Of The Review Committee, Insolvency Law And Practice, 1982, Cmnd. 8558, 1409, at 320 (Eng.)
51.
Report Of The Study Committee On Bankruptcy And Insolvency Legislation 3.2.075, at 123 (1970) (Can.).
52.
Richard L. Koral & Marie-Christine Sordino, The New Bankruptcy Reorganization Law in France: Ten Years Later, 70 AM. BANKR. L.J. 437, 437 (1996).
53.
Senate Comm. on the Judiciary, to Accompany S. 2266, S. REP. . 95-989, at 14 (1978), reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5787, 5800.
54.
South African Insolvency Act 24 of 1936, applicable to the Companies Act 61 of 1973.
55.
South African Law Commission Working Paper 61, Review Of The Law Of Insolvency: Statutory Provisions That Benefit Creditors (1995).
56.
South African Law Commission, Report on Amendments to South Africa.s Insolvency Laws (1984) [ISBN 0621 090840].
57.
Thomas H. Jackson, The Logic and Limits of Bankruptcy Law (1986). at. 21.
58.
Willi Leibfritz et al., The Tax System of Germany, 10 Tax Notes Int'l 465, 476 (1995) (discussing assignment of yield of certain taxes to local governments).
59.
Bekker A. Gosudarstvo vstanet v obshchuyu ochered' kreditorov // Vedomosti. 29 yanvarya 2002 g.
60.
Borisenkova T.V. Sootnoshenie chastnykh i publichnykh interesov pri pravovom regulirovanii bankrotstva yuridicheskikh lits avtoref. diss. k.yu.n. 12.00.03. M., 2008. S. 26.
61.
Borisenkova T.V. Tri Rossiiskikh zakona o bankrotstve: balans chastnykh i publichnykh interesov // SPS Konsul'tant Plyus.
62.
Brezho M.A. Zashchita interesov gosudarstva pri bankrotstve unitarnykh predpriyatii i inykh kommercheskikh organizatsii s dolei gosudarstvennogo uchastiya avtoref. diss. k.yu.n. 12.00.03. M., 2005. S. 25.
63.
Vitryanskii V.V. Novoe v pravovom regulirovanii nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstva) // Khozyaistvo i pravo. 2003. 1. S. 3.
64.
Goncharov M.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za prichinenie imushchestvennogo ushcherba putem obmana v sfere nalogooblozheniya: diss. kand.yurid.nauk. 12.00.08. Tambov., 2010. 223 s.
65.
Zaklyuchenie Komiteta po sobstvennosti ot 14.02.2002 3.9-12.12 Na proekt Federal'nogo zakona 165603-3 O nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve) // SPS Konsul'tant Plyus.
66.
Zaklyuchenie Pravovogo upravleniya Apparata GD FS RF ot 18.02.2002 2.2-1/5059 Po proektu Federal'nogo zakona 165603-3 O nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve) i po proektu sootvetstvuyushchego postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoi Dumy // SPS Konsul'tant Plyus.
67.
Igolkina K.N. Vzyskanie ispolnitel'skogo sbora: diss. kand.yurid.nauk: 12.00.14. M., 2013. S. 167.
68.
Institut bankrotstva: stanovlenie, problemy, napravleniya reformirovaniya Gontmakher A.E., Kuzyk M.G., Mezheraups I.V., Svein Kh., Simachev Yu.V., Shmeleva N.A., Entov R. Konsortsium po vopr. priklad. ekon. issled. (CEPRA), Kanad. agentstvo po mezhdunar. razvitiyu (i dr.) pod red. Radygina A. D. M., 2005. 432 s.
69.
Kasnitskaya I.Yu. Ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika prestuplenii v sfere nalogooblozheniya: diss. kand.yurid.nauk: 12.00.08. Tyumen', 2008. 233 s.
70.
Laskina S.O. Zashchita zakonnykh finansovykh interesov gosudarstva pri bankrotstve yuridicheskikh lits: dis. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.14. M., 2010. 199 s.
71.
O nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve) predpriyatii: Zakon Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 19.11.1992 3929-1 // Rossiiskaya gazeta, 279, 30.12.1992.
72.
O nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve): Federal'nyi zakon ot 08.01.1998 6-FZ // SZ RF, 12.01.1998, 2, st. 222.
73.
O nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve): Federal'nyi zakon ot 26.10.2002 127-FZ SZ RF, 28.10.2002, 43, st. 4190.
74.
Pasport proekta Federal'nogo zakona 165603-3 O nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve) // SPS Konsul'tant Plyus.
75.
Pasport proekta Federal'nogo zakona 727385-6 O vnesenii izmenenii v stat'yu 137 Federal'nogo zakona O nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve), vnesen deputatami Gosudarstvennoi Dumy FS RF S.A. Gavrilovym, A.V. Zharkovym, chlenom Soveta Federatsii FS RF A.V. Belyakovym (snyat s rassmotreniya).
76.
Pochemu otklonen Zakon o bankrotstve // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 7 avgusta 2002 g.
77.
Sobranie uzakonenii RSFSR 1927 g. 123. S. 830.
78.
Studentsova O.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie protsedur bankrotstva po zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i SShA: sravnitel'nyi analiz. diss. k.yu.n.: 12.00.03.-M. 2006. S. 95.
79.
Khimichev V.A. Zashchita prav kreditorov pri bankrotstve. M.: Izd-vo Volters Kluver, 2005. S. 18.
80.
Shershenevich G.F. Uchenie o nesostoyatel'nosti. Kazan', 1890. S. 67.