Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2156,   Articles in work: 281 Declined articles: 961 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Processes of supplanting and substitution of national interests with corporate ones in global politics: the conflict of interests and values
Karpovich Oleg Gennad'evich

Doctor of Politics

Deputy Director of the Insitute, Institue of Stategic Research and Forecasting of the People's Friendship University of Russia

101000, Russia, Moscow, Mikluho-Maklaya Street 6

karpovich40@mail.ru
Abstract. The piece studies the modern processes of supplanting and substitution of national interests with the corporate interests of new political actors – transnational corporations in global politics, resulting in the conflicts of interests and values. The research object is global politics as a whole and political activities of non-state actors in particular. The research subject is the conflicts of interests and values arising in the result of supplanting and substitution of national interests with corporate ones in global politics. The purpose of the research is to find out the essence and the content of modern processes of supplanting of national interests from global politics and their substitution with corporate interests and values of TNCs. The research methodology is based on the system, institutional, structural-functional and comparative-political approaches, the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction and observation.
The author focuses on the fact that in the result of the transformation of the global political system, caused by a massive “invasion” of TNCs in the political sphere, the national sovereignty principle can be substituted with the transnational interests’ balance principle, and international law – with corporate law extending its influence on the global political sphere. In this context, the growth of TNCs’ and the related groups’ interests in global politics can lead to the substitution of corporate interests of TNCs’ for national interests; it can cause further commercialization of global politics, supplanting of nation-states on its periphery, and indication of new challenges and threats to international security. 

Keywords: political regime, international relations, U.S. foreign policy, global politics, global information space, political system, interests, state, security, risks
DOI: 10.25136/2409-7543.2017.3.21288
Article was received: 02-12-2016

Review date: 03-12-2016

Publish date: 10-06-2017

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here.

References
1.
Afontsev S.A. Transnatsional'nye kompanii i problema global'nogo upravleniya. S. 4-5. V kn.: TNK v mirovoi politike i mirovoi ekonomike: problemy, tendentsii, perspektivy / Otv. red. k.pol.n. E.G. Solov'ev M.: IMEMO RAN, 2005. 128 s. S.6.
2.
Stezhneva M. Real'nost' i teoriya. Integratsiya i vovlechenie kak instrumenty global'nogo upravleniya // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, 2005, 1, s. 18.
3.
Tsygankov P.A. Mirovaya politicheskaya dinamika sovremennogo mira. Teoriya i praktika. M.: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 2014. 576 s. (Biblioteka fakul'teta politologii MGU). S. 51.
4.
Komarova L. A. Protivopravnaya deyatel'nost' transnatsional'nykh korporatsii i problema otvetstvennosti za mezhdunarodnye prestupleniya i pravonarusheniya // Sov. ezhegodnik mezhd. prava. 1985. M., 1986. S. 150.
5.
General'naya Assambleya OON. Ofitsial'nye otchety. 39-aya sessiya, dopolnenie 48 (A/39/48). S. 15.
6.
Vallerstain I. Analiz mirovykh sistem i situatsiya v sovremennom mire. SPb. 2001.
7.
Blagov Yu.E. Korporativnaya sotsial'naya otvetstvennost': evolyutsiya kontseptsii / Yu.E. Blagov. Spb. : Vysshaya shkola menedzhmenta, 2010. s. 155.
8.
Degtev A.S. Politicheskoe vliyanie TNK kak problema globaliziruyushchegosya mira. [Elektronnyi dokument] / URL: http://www.za-nauku.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7249&Itemid=35 (Data obrashcheniya 21.07.2016)
9.
Jenkins H. and Hines F. Shouldering the Burden of Corporate Social Responsibility: What Makes Business Get Committed? // The Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society, Working Paper Series, 2003, 4. (http://www.brass.cf.ac.uk/wpshoulderingburdencsrHJFH0403.pdf)
10.
Kobrin S.J. Back to the Future: Neomedievalism and the Postmodern Digital World Economy // Journal of International Affairs, Spring 1998, v.51, 2, p.361-386. Tsit. po: Afontsev S.A. Transnatsional'nye kompanii i problema global'nogo upravleniya. S. 4-5. V kn.: TNK v mirovoi politike i mirovoi ekonomike: problemy, tendentsii, perspektivy / Otv. red. k.pol.n. E.G. Solov'ev M.: IMEMO RAN, 2005. 128 s. S.8.
11.
Bolotova E.A. Vliyanie TNK na razvitie informatsionnykh rynkov stran bazirovaniya i stran periferii // sbornik statei TNK v mirovoi politike i mirovoi ekonomike: problemy, tendentsii, perspektivy / Otv. red. k.pol.n. E.G. Solov'ev. M.: IMEMO RAN, 2005.
12.
Shishkov Yu. Gosudarstvo v epokhu globalizatsii // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2010.- 1.-S. 3.
13.
Akopyants A.K. Transnatsionalizatsiya mirovogo politicheskogo protsessa // Vlast'. 2013. 1. S. 174-177. S. 176.
14.
Chumakov A.N. Global'nyi krizis i aktual'nye zadachi rossiiskogo obshchestva. S. 152-153.
15.
Lebedeva M.M. Predmetnoe pole i predmetnye polya mirovoi politiki. [Elektronnyi dokument] / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. URL: http://www.intertrends.ru/five/008.htm (Data obrashcheniya 04.08.2016)
16.
Friedman Th.L. The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 1999. Tsit. po: Lebedeva M.M. Predmetnoe pole i predmetnye polya mirovoi politiki. [Elektronnyi dokument] / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. URL: http://www.intertrends.ru/five/008.htm (Data obrashcheniya 04.08.2016)
17.
Fukuyama F. Konets istorii? // Voprosy filosofii. 1990. 3. S. 134-148. Tsit. po: Lebedeva M.M. Predmetnoe pole i predmetnye polya mirovoi politiki. [Elektronnyi dokument] / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. URL: http://www.intertrends.ru/five/008.htm (Data obrashcheniya 04.08.2016)
18.
Gal'tung I. Desyat' tendentsii, menyayushchikh mir // Rossiya v global'noi politike, 2011, 4, S. 1213.
19.
Toffler E. Tret'ya volna. M.: OOO "Firma "Izdatel'stvo ACT", 1999, 261 s. S. 224.
20.
Bartlett C. A., Ghoshal S. Managing across Borders: The transnational solution. New York, 1998
21.
Cox T. Cultural diversity in organizations. San Francisco, 1993
22.
Moore F. Transnational Business Cultures: Life and Work in a Multinational Corporation. Ashgate, 2005; Trompenaars F. Managing across cultures. New York, 1993.
23.
Dorou V., Blazeevski S. Problema vnedreniya kodeksa korporativnykh tsennostei: praktika transnatsional'nykh korporatsii. // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 2008. Seriya 5. Vyp. 1. S. 102-114. S. 103.
24.
Blazejewski S., Dorow W. Unternehmenskulturen in globaler Interaktion. Ein Leitfaden für die Praxis. Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh, 2005.
25.
Unternehmenskulturen in globaler Interaktion / W. Auer-Rizzi, S. Blazejewski, W. Dorow, G. Reber (Hrsg.). Wiesbaden, 2007.
26.
Schein E. H. Process consultation, action research and clinical inquiry: Are they the same? // Journal of Managerial Psychology. 1995. N 10 (6). P. 1419.
27.
Il'in I.V. Globalistika v kontekste politicheskikh protsessov. Diss. dokt. polit. nauk. M.: MGU, 2011. 396 s.-S. 308-309.
28.
Vel'yaminov G.M. Rossiya i globalizatsiya // Rossiya v global'noi politike. 2006. 3; Goldstein Joshua S. International Relation. 6th ed. 2005.
29.
Degtev A.S. Politicheskoe vliyanie TNK kak problema globaliziruyushchegosya mira. [Elektronnyi dokument] / URL: http://www.za-nauku.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7249&Itemid=35 (Data obrashcheniya 21.07.2016)
30.
Manoilo A.V. Rol' tsvetnykh revolyutsii v demontazhe sovremennykh politicheskikh rezhimov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2014. 3. S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.3.12058
31.
Manoilo A.V. Politicheskie konflikty v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh i mirovoi politike. //Mir i Politika. 2013. 2. S. 71-82.
32.
Filippov V.R. Etnopoliticheskie paradoksy i krizis rossiiskogo federalizma. V sbornike: Federalizm i regional'naya politika v polietnichnykh gosudarstvakh. M., 2001. S. 23-38.
33.
Filippov V.R. Etnichnost' i vlast' v stolichnom megapolise. M., 2009. Ser. Buntuyushchaya etnichnost'.-240 s.
34.
Filippova E.I., Filippov V.R. Gornyi Altai. Mezhnatsional'nye otnosheniya segodnya i zavtra // Mir Rossii: sotsiologiya, etnologiya. 1993. T. 2. 1. S. 63-76.
35.
Karpovich O.G. Interesy SShA v Ukrainskom krizise 201314-kh gg.: osnovnye vygody i preimushchestva // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2016. - 8. - C. 1039 - 1048. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2016.8.19468.
36.
Denchev S., Pavlova M. Tsvetnye revolyutsii: Kto smeshivaet kraski i kto khudozhnik? // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2016. - 1. - C. 5 - 10. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2016.1.18498.
37.
Bocharnikov I.V. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya mezhdunarodnogo terrorizma // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2016. - 1. - C. 52 - 61. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2016.1.17852.
38.
Karpovich O.G. Separatizm i separatistskie dvizheniya v sovremennom mire (na primere Bel'gii i Velikobritanii): sravnitel'nyi analiz // Pravo i politika. - 2016. - 4. - C. 449 - 457. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.4.18693.
39.
Manoilo A.V. Modeli vyrabotki politicheskikh reshenii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: evolyutsiya upravlencheskikh paradigm // Pravo i politika. - 2016. - 3. - C. 326 - 329. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.3.17453.
40.
Ivanov S.M. Separatizm estestvennyi protsess ili ugroza natsional'noi i mezhdunarodnoi bezopasnosti? // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2016. - 1. - C. 62 - 71. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2016.1.17856.
41.
Fel'dman P.Ya. Mekhanizmy politicheskogo soglasovaniya interesov: sistemnyi analiz // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2015. - 4. - C. 416 - 423. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2015.4.17394.
42.
Karpovich O.G. Myagkaya sila brazil'skoi modeli federalizma // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2016. - 2. - C. 164 - 171. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2016.2.17128.
43.
Filippov V.R. Tainaya voina Frantsii v Biafre // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2016. - 3. - C. 285 - 300. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2016.3.18323.
44.
Karpovich O.G. Osobennosti sovremennogo severoamerikanskogo federalizma (na primere SShA) // Pravo i politika. - 2016. - 2. - C. 158 - 166. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.2.17816.
45.
Linke P. Poslednie izmeneniya v politike Germanii na Blizhnem i Srednem Vostoke // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2016. - 2. - C. 124 - 129. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2016.2.17456.
46.
Filippov V.R. Kongo-Brazzavil' v setyakh "Fransafrik" // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2016. - 2. - C. 155 - 162. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2016.2.19426.
47.
Manoilo A.V. O sozdanii Federal'nogo tsentra monitoringa tsvetnykh revolyutsii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2016. - 1. - C. 4 - 6. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2016.1.17781.
48.
Kuznetsov I.I. Vliyanie demonstratsionnykh effektov na stanovlenie politicheskikh institutov // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 4. - C. 412 - 425. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.4.17162.
49.
Kuznetsov I.I. Politicheskaya pragmatika imperii: retsenziya na knigu Gerfrida Myunklera "Imperii: Logika gospodstva nad mirom ot Drevnego Rima i do SShA" // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 4. - C. 454 - 460. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.4.16977.
50.
Karpovich O.G. Novye vyzovy i ugrozy v Strategii natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2016. - 5. - C. 579 - 587. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2016.5.20022.
51.
Karpovich O.G. Rol' SShA v Ukrainskom krizise (20132014-e gg.) // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2016. - 2. - C. 179 - 188. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2016.2.19466.
52.
Bocharnikov I.V. Istoki i evolyutsiya terrora i terrorizma v mirovoi politicheskoi praktike // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2016. - 2. - C. 130 - 138. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2016.2.17783.