Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1961,   Articles in work: 287 Declined articles: 830 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Russian Construction Education in the Era of Innovations: Socio-Cultural and Pedagogical Aspect
Pryadko Igor' Petrovich

PhD in Cultural Studies

Docent, the department of Social, Psychological, and Legal Communications, National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering

141018, Russia, Moscow Oblast, Mytishchi, Novovomytischinsky Prospekt 86-4

priadcko.igor2011@yandex.ru

 

 
Lebedev Igor' Mikhailovich

Senior Lecturer at Moscow State University of Civil Engineering

117246, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Khersonskaya, 13

Lebedev26@mail.ru

Abstract.

The authors of the present article offer their evaluation of transformations that are happening in the Russian university education and aimed at bringing the system of education with Bologna process standards. The authors analyze these transformations from the point of view of the need to train specialists in the field of construction. They analyze conclusions made by University professors majoring in construction. In particular, University professors worry about such factors as a low level of knowledge about objectives of aforesaid reformations and unawareness of measures that can improve the existing system of education. The research contains the results of a survey that involved teachers and students in the field of construction who work and study in Moscow or Moscow Region. The results of the questionnaire demonstrate that there are the following factors that prevent the academic community from reformation of Russian university education in accordance with Bologna standards: low English proficiency of students and insufficient profits. These factors make it nearly impossible for Russian students to study abroad and thus decrease the competitive ability of Russian university graduates on the global labor market despite the fact that these universities have adopted the Bologna system of education. The authors of the article also use mass media data in their research. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the authors focus on the needs of construction companies in well trained and skilled professionals. The authors mention that the major part of experts also underline that universities do not train their students to solve practical issues in construction or building as well as that the Russian education system is significantly behind the Western system education when it comes to training specialists in construction logistics and management of construction sites.   construction education, the Bologna process, competence, higher education, education, the Education Act, Bologna, Bologna system, innovation, logistics
 

Keywords: innovation, Bologna system, Bologna, Education Act, education, higher education, competence, Bologna process, construction education, logistics

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0676.2018.1.22378

Article was received:

25-03-2017


Review date:

26-03-2017


Publish date:

21-03-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Ishkov A. D., Mishlanova M. Y., Grabovyi K. P. The Organization of Innovative Activi-ties of A Construction Company // International Journal of Applied Engineering. Res. 2016. 3(11).
2.
Leontev M. G. Innovative Approaches in Distance Education in the Field of Environ-mental Management and Environmental Technologies // MATEC Web of Conf. Vol. 73. 2016.
3.
Medvedev S. A. Bolonskii protsess. Rossiya i globalizatsiya,Bolonsk. protsess i ego znachenie dlya Rossii. M.: RETsEP, 2005. S.1729.
4.
Ivanova M. A. Reforma vysshei shkoly: vzglyad iz stroitel'nogo vuza // Trudy XVII mezhdunarodnoi mezhvuzovskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. M.: MGSU, 2014. S.711-714.
5.
Vlasenko L. V. i dr. Professional'naya kompetentnost' spetsialista stroitel'noi sfery v otsenke rukovodstva predpriyatii // Integratsiya, partnerstvo i innovatsii v stroi-tel'noi nauke i obrazovanii. T. 1. M.: Izd. MGSU, 2012. S.656660.
6.
Vlasenko L. V. i dr. Professional'naya kompetentnost' spetsialista stroitel'noi sfery v otsenke rukovodstva predpriyatii // Smetno-dogovornaya rabota v stroitel'stve. 2016. 1. S. 22-26.
7.
Makovskii L. V., Salamakhin P. M. Sovershenstvovanie podgotovki spetsialistov v oblasti avtodorozhnogo mosto-i tonnelestroeniya // Nauka i tekhnika v dorozhnoi otrasli. 2012. 1. S. 1-2.
8.
Polyakov D. V. Proektirovanie soderzhaniya obucheniya pri podgotovke studentov vuza k razrabotke programmnogo obespecheniya // Nauchno-pedagogicheskoe obozrenie. 2016. 11. S.72-79.
9.
Brovkin A. V. Sub''ektivnye zapiski prepodavatelya vuza // Pedagogika i prosve-shchenie. 2017. 1. S. 9-18.
10.
Jaspers K. Die Idee der Universitaet. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1946.
11.
Chistokhvalov V. N., Kim Ch. Yu., Omurzakova A. V. Ramki edinogo prostranstva. // Akkreditatsiya v obrazovanii. Ioshkar-Ola, 2013.
12.
Birjukov B. Two soviet studies on Frege. Dortrecht: Redel, 1964.
13.
Pryadko I. P. Razmyshlyaya nad rabotami B.V.Biryukova // Istoriko-filosofskii ezhegodnik. M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2013. 1. S.385398.
14.
Bazhanov V. A. Poezdka Kurta Gedelya po SSSR: maloizvestnye fakty // Sovremen-naya logika: problemy teorii, istorii i primeneniya v nauke. Materialy IX Obshcherossii-skoi nauchn. konf. SPb: Izd. SPbGU, 2006. S.213-214.
15.
Biryukov B. V., Pryadko I. P. Zapisi v dnevnike Lyudviga Vitgenshteina v period ego prebyvaniya v SSSR i otechestvennye khronometricheskie novatsii 1920-1930-e gg. // So-vremennaya logika: problemy teorii, istorii i primeneniya v nauke. Materialy IX Obshche-rossiiskoi nauchn. konf. SPb: Izd. SPbGU, 2006. S. 216-219.
16.
Gersevanov N. M. Osnovy dinamiki gruntovoi massy. M.-L.:ONTI, Glavnaya re-daktsiya tekhnicheskoi literatury, 1937.
17.
U istokov prakticheskoi nauki // Stroitel'nye kadry. 2016. 9 (1664). S.9-10.
18.
Ovchinnokova N. Obrazovatel'nye programmy universitetov dolzhny byt' razny-mi // Stroitel'nye kadry. 2016. 9 (1664). S.12-13.
19.
Vorob'eva T. Innovatsii v stroitel'stve // Tyumenskii biznes-zhurn. 2013. 8, 130. S.3650.
20.
Miloradova N. G., Ishkov A. D. Motivational Preferences of the Managers in Production and Promotion of Innovative Materials and Technologies, MATEC Web Conf. 73 (2016)
21.
Volovik M. V., Ershov M. N., Ishin A. V. Innovatsii v tekhnologii i organizatsii stroitel'stva // Tekhnologii i organizatsii ctroitel'nogo proizvodstva. 2013. 4(5). S.816.
22.
Romanova E. V. Studying of Innovative Qualities at Experts in the Field of Production and Use of Eco-Friendly Construction Materials // Materials Science Forum, 2016. 871. P. 132.
23.
Blesnuli innovatsiyami // Stroitel'nye kadry, 2016. 8 (1663). S.17.
24.
Prikaz Minobrnauki Rossii ot 12.03.2015 N 201 Ob utverzhdenii federal'nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel'nogo standarta vysshego obrazovaniya po napravleniyu podgo-tovki 08.03.01 Stroitel'stvo (uroven' bakalavriata) (Zaregistrirovano v Minyuste RF 07.04.2015 N 36767) Rezhim dostupa: http://fgosvo.ru/uploadfiles/fgosvob/080301.pdf
25.
Essbach W. Mit dem Buldozer gegen die Universitaet // Zueddeutsche Zeitung. 2004. 12. S.16.
26.
Florenskii P. A. Predpolagaemoe gosudarstvennoe ustroistvo v budushchem // Lite-raturnaya ucheba. 1991. 5.