Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1989,   Articles in work: 305 Declined articles: 758 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

On the Methodology for Assessing the Comparative Effectiveness of the Implementation of the Consolidated Budget by the Russian Federation Constituents in the Sphere of Preschool Education
Porunov Arkadii Nikolaevich

PhD in Economics

Researcher at Laboratory for Strategic Research at Samara State Technical University

446073, Russia, Samarskaya oblast', g. Samara, ul. Molodogvardeiskaya, 224

rameno@rambler.ru

Abstract.

Despite tangible progress in the development of the federal system for assessing the quality of preschool education, the key problem at the present stage of its development is the problem of imbalance in assessing the comparative effectiveness of financial resources channeled to the regions for the development of pre-school education. This, to a large extent, makes it difficult to take sufficiently effective managerial decisions to improve its quality. At the same time, in the world practice, considerable experience has been accumulated in the application of DEA analysis tools for solving similar problems. The article considers key aspects of the methodology for assessing the comparative effectiveness of financial management based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) or DEA analysis. DEA-analysis was used by the author to comprehensively assess the comparative effectiveness of the implementation of the consolidated budget by the constituent entities of the Federation and territorial state extra-budgetary funds in the sphere of preschool education for the year 2015. The methodological tools of the study are based on methods of system analysis, mathematical, economic, statistical analysis, decomposition and aggregation. The results of the DEA analysis of the results of the implementation of the consolidated budget by the Russian Federation constituents and territorial state extra-budgetary funds in the sphere of preschool education showed that the absolute majority of regions (94%) had extremely low comparative performance of the consolidated budget for best practices. The best practice (absolutely effective) budget execution at the time of the survey was observed in the Chukotka Autonomous District.

Keywords: pedagogical staff, constituent, regional management, validity, DEA-method, comparative economic efficiency, Pre-school education, consolidated budge, infrastructure, pre-school educational institution

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0765.2018.1.22393

Article was received:

27-03-2017


Review date:

24-03-2017


Publish date:

17-10-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Federal'noe kaznacheistvo. Konsolidirovannye byudzhety sub''ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii i byudzhetov territorial'nykh gosudarstvennykh vnebyudzhetnykh fondov v 2015 godu. [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: http://www.roskazna.ru/ispolnenie-byudzhetov/konsolidirovannye-byudzhety-subektov/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.03.2017)
2.
Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoi statistiki. Operativnaya informatsiya. Svedeniya ob organizatsiyakh, osushchestvlyayushchikh obrazovatel'nuyu deyatel'nost' po obrazovatel'nym programmam doshkol'nogo obrazovaniya, prismotr i ukhod za det'mi za 2015 god. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/population/education/ (data obrashcheniya: 18.03.2017)
3.
Minfin Rossii. Metodika raspredeleniya sredstv fonda finansovoi podderzhki sub''ektov rossiiskoi federatsii. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://minfin.ru/common/upload/library/2000/11/mffpr1.doc. (data obrashcheniya: 31.01.2017)
4.
Minfin Rossii. Uroven' raschetnoi byudzhetnoi obespechennosti sub''ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii posle raspredeleniya dotatsii na vyravnivanie byudzhetnoi obespechennosti i indeks byudzhetnykh raskhodov v 2015-2017 godakh. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://minfin.ru/ru/document/?id_4=23057. (data obrashcheniya: 31.01.2017)
5.
Akhremenko A. S., Petrov A. P. Institutsional'noe investirovanie i effektivnost' obshchestvennoi sistemy: opyt matematicheskogo modelirovaniya // V kn.: Metod: moskovskii ezhegodnik trudov iz obshchestvovedcheskikh distsiplin / Pod obshch. red.: M. V. Il'in. Vyp. 4. M. : INION RAN, 2014. S. 62-82.
6.
Akhremenko A. S., Yureskul E. A. Effektivnost' gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: politologicheskii i ekonomicheskii podkhody // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost', № 1, 2013
7.
Akhremenko, A. S. Sotsial'naya effektivnost' gosudarstva v regionakh Rossii: 2008 – 2011 gg. [Elektronnyi resurs] : preprintWP14/2013/07 / A. S. Akhremenko; Nats. issled. un-t«Vysshaya shko-la ekonomiki». – M. : Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2013. – Elektron. tekst. dan. (1MV). – 64 s. – (SeriyaWP14 «Politicheskaya teoriya i politicheskii analiz»).
8.
Bussofiane A., Daison R. Dzh., Tanasulis E. 2012. Prikladnoi analiz svertki dannykh. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta 10 (2): 63–88.
9.
Dzh. B. Klark, Raspredelenie bogatstva, M.: Gelios ARV, 2000. 367c.
10.
Krivonozhko V.E. Neformal'noe opisanie tekhnologii ASF // «Bankovskie tekhnologii». 2001. №5. S. 19–28.
11.
Krivonozhko V.E., Lychev A.V. Analiz deyatel'nosti slozhnykh sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh sistem.-M.: Izdatel'skii otdel fakul'teta VMiK MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova (litsenziya ID N 05899 ot 24.09.2001 g.); MAKS Press, 2010.-208 s.
12.
Krivonozhko, V. E. Analiz effektivnosti funktsionirovaniya slozhnykh sistem. [Tekst] / V. E. Krivonozhko // Avtomatizatsiya proektirovaniya.-1999.-№ 1
13.
Lissitsa A. Analiz obolochki dannykh (DEA). Sovremennaya metodika opredeleniya effektivnosti proizvodstva / A. Lissitsa, T. Babicheva.-Halle : Institute of agricultural development of Central and Eastern Europe, Germany, 2003.-32 p.
14.
Mazorchuk M. S., Dobryak V. S., Emel'yanov P. S. Analiz prakticheskogo primeneniya metoda «okhvata dannykh» dlya otsenki effektivnosti obrazovatel'nogo protsessa. // Otkrytye informatsionnye i komp'yuternye integrirovannye tekhnologii. № 69, 2015. S.234-246
15.
Morgunov, E. P. Mnogomernaya klassifikatsiya slozhnykh ob''ektov na osnove otsenki ikh effektivnosti [Tekst] /E. P. Morgunov, O. N. Morgunova //Vestnik NII SUVPT: sb. nauch. tr. /Pod obshch. red. prof. N. V. Vasilenko. – Krasnoyarsk, 2003. – Vyp. 14. – S. 222–240.
16.
Podinovskii V. V., Gavrilov V. M. Optimizatsiya po posledovatel'no primenyaemym kriteriyam. M.: Sovetskoe radio, 1975. 192 s.
17.
Porunov A.N. Otsenka sravnitel'noi effektivnosti gosudarstvennogo menedzhmenta ekologicheskoi bezopasnosti v regione metodom DEA-analiza (na primere Privolzhskogo federal'nogo okruga) Nauchnyi zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriya «Ekonomika i ekologicheskii menedzhment» № 1, 2016. C.104-111
18.
R.L. Kini, Kh. Raif Prinyatie reshenii pri mnogikh kriteriyakh: predpochteniya i zameshcheniya. M.: Radio i svyaz', 1981. 560 s.
19.
Fedotov Yu. V. Metod DEA: analiz svertki dannykh. Vysshaya shkola menedzhmenta SPbGU, Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta, Tom 10, № 2, 2012
20.
Fedotov Yu. V. 1992. Otsenka effektivnosti proizvodstvennoi deyatel'nosti firmy s pomoshch'yu proizvodstvennoi funktsii. Vestnik S.-Peterburgskogo un-ta. Seriya Ekonomika (3): 112–118.
21.
Shvetsov A.V. Statisticheskii analiz byudzhetnoi obespechennosti sub''ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Rossiiskoe predprinimatel'stvo. — 2010. — № 7-1 (162). — s. 138-142. — URL: http://bgscience.ru/lib/6108/. Data obrashcheniya: 15.11.16
22.
Andersen P., Petersen N. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis, Manage. Sci. 39 (10), 1261-1264, 1993.
23.
Bowlin, W.F. (1998) Measuring Performance: An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Journal of Cost Analysis 7, 3-27.
24.
Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (6): 429–444.
25.
Coelli T., Prasada Rao D. S., Battese G. E. 2005. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. 2nd ed. Springer: N. Y.
26.
Cook WD, Harrison J, Imanirad R, Rouse P, Zhu J. Data Envelopment Analysis with Nonhomogeneous DMUs. Oper. Res. Vol. 61, No. 3, May–June 2013, pp. 666–676 ISSN 0030-364X (print) . ISSN 1526-5463 (online)
27.
Cook WD, Zhu J (2011) Multiple variable proportionality in DEA. Oper. Res. 59(4):1024–1032.
28.
Cooper W. W., Seiford L. M., Zhu J. (eds.). 2004. Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing: BostonDordrecht-Lancaster.
29.
Dyson, R.G., Allen, R., Camanho, A.S., Podinovski, V.V., Sarrico, C.S., and Shale, E.A., (2001) Pitfalls and Protocols in DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 245-259.
30.
Hammerschmidt, M. (2006): Effizienzanalyse im Marketing – Ein produktionstheoretisch fundierter Ansatz auf Basis von Frontier Functions. Wiesbaden 2006.
31.
Hammerschmidt, M./Falk, T./Bauer, H. H. (2009): Investigating the Brand Productivity Gap. Working paper, Universität Mannheim 2009.
32.
Podinovski V.V, Athanassopoulos A. Assessing the relative efficiency of decision making units in DEA models with weight restrictions, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 49, 500-508, 1998.
33.
The problem of a missing output in a subset of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 220(1):79–84.
34.
Wilken, R. (2007): Dynamisches Benchmarking. Ein Verfahren auf Basis der Data Envelopment Analysis. Wiesbaden 2007.