Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2115,   Articles in work: 280 Declined articles: 925 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Human existence in post-human world (prolegomena to the philosophy of phenomenological substantialism)
Kutyrev Vladimir Aleksandrovich

Doctor of Philosophy

professor of the Department of History, Methodology and Philosophy of Science at N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod.

kut.va@mail.ru
Abstract. This article reveals and structures the key stages of the “oblivion of being” in the history of philosophy. The final refusal of it became the transcendental phenomenology of Husserl. It became the first earthly experience of emergence of post-human form of thinking as a speculative-philosophical provision of information revolution. Logos and macro-reality depart under the pressure of digitalism and virtualism. The world is real as an identical to itself Thought. There takes place the refusal of being as thingness and resistance in favor of being as the relations that can be cognized through its predestination and “reshuffle” to Nothingness. Preservation of human vital world must lean on the substantial (realistic) phenomenology – phenomenological substantialism. The author depicts the boundaries of such new methodology, and introduces the notion of phenomenon-substance (ontophany) that contradicts to the principle of scientific-reductionist modelling of the world. It is illustrated that being cannot be reduced to any form of knowledge. In such case, it would be a different reality. In light of the task for reconstructing philosophy, the author assesses the modern state of phenomenological movements, reveals the essence of anthropological conservatism as an ideology of preservation of “our realization” of the possible worlds, as well as introduces the concept of “eternal renewal of one and the same”.
Keywords: transcendental, Heidegger, Husserl, realism, phenomenology, other, being, Dasein, ontophany, antropological conservatism
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2017.4.22593
Article was received: 27-04-2017

Review date: 23-04-2017

Publish date: 07-06-2017

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here.

References
1.
Yum 1965 – Yum D. Issledovaniya chelovecheskogo razuma. //Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 1. M. 1965. 847 c.
2.
Gusserl' 2005 – Gusserl' E. Filosofiya kak strogaya nauka. // Izbrannye raboty. M., 2005. 464 s.
3.
Kutyrev 2013 – Kutyrev V.Transtsendental'naya fenomenologiya kak filosofsko-istoricheskoe (pred)shestvie infokognitivnoi revolyutsii // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. 2013, № 7. s.100-135.
4.
Khaidegger 1993 – Khaidegger M. Vremya i bytie. M. 1993. 447 s.
5.
Nagel' 2003 – Nagel' T. Kakovo byt' letuchei mysh'yu? // Glaz razuma. Samara. 2003. 432 s.
6.
Al'per 2014 – Al'per M. Bog i mozg. Nauchnoe ob''yasnenie Boga, religioznosti i dukhovnosti. M., 2014. 448 s.
7.
Ennis 2010 – Ennis P. Post-Continental Voices: Selected Interviews // Winchester, UK: Zero Books.2010. 112 p.
8.
Born 1968 – Born M. Vospominaniya ob Einshteine. // Voprosy filosofii. 1968, № 11. s.125-134.
9.
Osho 2005 – Osho. Chelovek, kotoryi lyubil chaek. SPb., 2005. 345 s.
10.
Ankersmit 2007 – Ankersmit F. Vozvyshennyi istoricheskii opyt. M., 2007 612 s.
11.
Ferraris 2014 – Ferraris M. Chto takoe novyi realizm? //Voprosy filosofii. 2014, № 8. s.145-159.