Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2341,   Articles in work: 282 Declined articles: 900 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile


Economic analysis of law: failures, opportunities, and limitations
Osipov Mikhail Yur'evich

PhD in Law

Senior Scientific Associate, Institute of Jurisprudence and Management of All-Russian Police Association

300028, Russia, Tul'skaya oblast', g. Tula, ul. Boldina, 98

osipov11789@yandex.ru
Abstract.  
The subject of this research is the economic analysis of law, its place and role within the system of methods of juridical science. The author examines various situations existing in legal reality for determination of the potential failures, opportunities, and limitations in implementation of the method of economic analysis of law in juridical science. Particular attention is given to such aspects of the topic as the failures of economic analysis of law and its limitations. Thus, the goal of this work lies in demonstration of the failures, opportunities, and limitation of the economic analysis of law. The scientific novelty consists in determination of the failures and limitations in application of the economic analysis of law, as well as giving definition to the failures and limitations of economic analysis of law. The work also demonstrated that the implementation of economic analysis of law cannot be realized independently from other methods of juridical science, due to the fact that its application “alone” can lead to disregard of such crucial principles of law, as the principle of good faith, principle of justice, principle of humanism, etc.
 

Keywords: potential, Legal reality, Legal phenomenon, method, analysis, law, economics, failure, limitation, Methodology
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2017.6.22716
Article was received: 21-04-2017

Publish date: 03-06-2017

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here.

References
1.
Tarasov N.N. Metodologicheskie problemy sovremennogo pravovedeniya: Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2002.-342 c.
2.
Babichev I.V. Munitsipal'noe pravo: sistemno-strukturnyi analiz yuridicheskikh konstruktsii. M.: Norma, Infra-M, 2010. 336 s.
3.
Baryshnikov P.S. Empiricheskie metody v nauke grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. 2015. N 11. S. 26-34.
4.
Kotsiol' Kh. Traditsionnyi podkhod k preventsii v deliktnom prave // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2014. N
5.
S. 196-232. 5. Karapetov A.G. Ekonomicheskii analiz prava. M.: Statut, 2016. – 528c.
6.
Mercuro N., Medema S.G. Economics and the Law: From Posner to Post-Modernism and Beyond. 2nd ed. Princeton University Press, 2006.-400p.
7.
Becker G.S. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. University of Chicago Press, 1976.-320p.
8.
Hylton K.N. Property Rules and Liability Rules, Once Again / / Review of Law & Economics. 2009. Vol. 2. No. 2.-p. 137–191
9.
Calabresi G., Melamed A. D. Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral / / Harvard Law Review. 1972. Vol. 85. p.1089-1128
10.
Lewinsohn-Zamir D. The Choice Between Property Rules and Liability Rules Revisited: Critical Observations from Behavioral Studies / / Texas Law Review. 2001. Vol. 80. P. 219
11.
Pozner R. «Ekonomicheskii analiz prava. V 2kh t. tom. 1 Perevod s angliiskogo pod redaktsiei V. L. Tambovtseva SPb 2004 548 s.
12.
Odintsova, M. I. Ekonomika prava : ucheb. posobie dlya bakalavriata i magistratury / M. I. Odintsova. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M .: Izdatel'stvo Yurait, 2016. — 345 s.
13.
Zerhe R. O. Economic Efficiency in Law and Economics. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar, 2001.-232p.
14.
Nersesyants V. S. Filosofiya prava/ V. S. Nersesyants.-M.: Norma-INFRA-M,-2003.-652s.
15.
Mangeim K. Diagnoz nashego vremeni. M.: Yurist, 1994.-700s
16.
Osipov M. Yu. Osnovnye faktory, vliyayushchie na pravosoznanie i pravomernoe povedenie // Yuridicheskie zapiski. 2013. №1. S.9-16
17.
Orobinskii V.V. Angliiskoe dogovornoe pravo : prosto o slozhnom. — Rostov n/D : Feniks, 2015.-346 s.
18.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 15.01.2015 N 7-"Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Parshina Aleksandra Vasil'evicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav chast'yu pervoi stat'i 333 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii"//"Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF", N 3, 2015
19.
"Konstitutsiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii" (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 N 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 N 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 N 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 N 11-FKZ)
20.
Cooter R. Ulen T. Law and Economics. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson A ddison, 2008-555p.