Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2113,   Articles in work: 279 Declined articles: 922 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

The electoral activity of the population of modern Russia in a hybrid political regime
Kirichek Andrei Igorevich

assistant of the Department of State and Municipal Administration atFar Eastern Federal University.

690109, Russia, Primorskii krai, g. Vladivostok, ul. Neibuta, 63, kv. 66

andrewword@inbox.ru
Spinei Kirill Aleksandrovich

Bachelor’s degree, Far Eastern Federal University

690091, Russia, Primorsky Krai, o. Russkiy, campus of the Far Eastern Federal University 8.2

kirill2015vip17@mail.ru
Abstract. This work is devoted to the main theoretical and methodological aspects of the concept of electoral authoritarianism in both foreign and domestic contexts and the study of electoral behavior of citizens both in the theoretical aspect and on the example of the upcoming presidential election in 2018. The aim of this work is to study the electoral activity of the population of modern Russia. The subject of the study is the electoral activity of the population of the Russian Federation in conditions of electoral authoritarianism. The work used a number of methods of scientific research, such as: analysis, synthesis, a method of sociological analysis. The authors pay special attention to typological features of electoral authoritarianism, their own definition and signs of electoral authoritarianism are given. In the work, the connection between political technologies and instruments used in regimes of a similar type co-optation, repression, legitimation, electoral clientelism, and the electoral behavior of citizens, is distinguished through the synthesis of foreign experience. Based on the methods of scientific research it was found that the decrease in the level of electoral activity of citizens is due to the lack of representation of all groups of the electoral process during the elections. The scientific novelty of the work consists in a comprehensive analysis of the theoretical aspects of the concept of electoral authoritarianism by the example of the electoral process in the Russian Federation, the generalization of the results in the form of some conclusions: electoral clientelism leads to the unrepresentation of large groups of voters, which increases the level of social tension and the level of protest sentiments; the policy of populism is applied to a limited number of persons, does not provide sufficient legitimation of power and should be applied to a wider range of voters. Theoretical propositions and conclusions of the work can be used to further study and search for political technologies and tools that stimulate the electoral activity of the population of modern Russia.
Keywords: political behavior, legitimation, co-optation, populism, political technologies, elections, electoral behavior, electoral authoritarianism, democracy, hybrid regime
DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2017.5.22988
Article was received: 11-05-2017

Review date: 11-05-2017

Publish date: 04-06-2017

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here.

References
1.
Gel'man, V.Ya. Iz ognya da v polymya? Dinamika postsovetskikh rezhimov v sravnitel'noi perspektive / V.Ya. Gel'man // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2. 2007. S. 81-108.
2.
Gel'man, V.Ya. Rastsvet i upadok elektoral'nogo avtoritarizma v Rossii / V.Ya. Gel'man // Politiya. 4(67). 2012. S. 6-24.
3.
Polyakov, L.V. Elektoral'nyi avtoritarizm i rossiiskii sluchai / L.V. Polyakov // Politiya. 2. 2015. S. 6-20.
4.
Fedorov, V. Ot plebistsita k vyboram: Kak i pochemu rossiyane golosovali na vyborakh 20112012 gg. / V. Fedorov // Praksis. 2013. 380 s.
5.
Pastukhov, V.B. Predchuvstvie grazhdanskoi voiny. Ot nomenklatury k kleptokrature: vzlet i padenie vnutrennego gosudarstva v sovremennoi Rossii / V.B. Pastukhov // Polis. 6. 2011. S. 143-159.
6.
Yanov, A.L. Neliberal'naya demokratiya i liberal'naya oppozitsiya. Nezavisimaya gazeta. 2004 [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.ng.ru/ideas/2004-04-16/11_democraty.html.
7.
Shul'man, E.M. Tsarstvo politicheskoi imitatsii. Vedomosti. 2014. 3653 [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2014/08/15/carstvo-imitacii.
8.
Churakova O., Mukhametshina E. Kreml' podnimet yavku kreativom. Vedomosti. 2017. 4287 [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2017/03/24/682556-kreml-izuchaet.
9.
Tsentral'naya izbiratel'naya komissiya. Vybory, referendumy i inye formy voleiz''yavleniya [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.vybory.izbirkom.ru.
10.
Kommunisticheskaya partiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Vybory prezidenta: Analitika mneniya, prognozy. 6-13 marta 2017 goda [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://kprf.ru/activity/elections/163530.html.
11.
Levada-tsentr. Odobrenie organov vlasti [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.levada.ru/indikatory/odobrenie-organov-vlasti.
12.
Fond Obshchestvennoe mnenie. V. Putin: reiting, otnoshenie, otsenki raboty [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://fom.ru/Politika/10946.
13.
Vserossiiskii tsentr izucheniya obshchestvennogo mneniya. Deyatel'nost' gosudarstvennykh institutov [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://wciom.ru/news/ratings/odobrenie_deyatelnosti_gosudarstvennyx_institutov.
14.
Vserossiiskii tsentr izucheniya obshchestvennogo mneniya. Otsenka vlastei [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://wciom.ru/news/ratings/ocenka_vlastej.
15.
Vserossiiskii tsentr izucheniya obshchestvennogo mneniya. Protestnyi potentsial [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://wciom.ru/news/ratings/protestnyj_potencial.
16.
Zinecker, Heidrun. Regime-Hybridity in Developing Countries: Achievements and Limitations of New Research on Transitions. International Studies Review 11 (2). 2009. P. 302331.
17.
Bunce, Valerie and Sharon L. Wolchik. Mixed Regimes in Postcommunist Eurasia: Tipping Democratic and Tipic Authoritarian. Democratization in European Former Soviet Republics: Limits, Obstacles and Perspectives. 2008. P. 57-86.
18.
Nozima Akhrarkhodjaeva. Instrumentalisation of Mass Media in Electoral Authoritarian Regimes. Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag. 2017. 283 p.
19.
D. Baluev, A. Novoselov. The "gray zones" of world politics. Essays on Current Politics. 2010. P. 266-268.
20.
Schedler, A. The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2013. 512 p.
21.
Rosenstone, S. J a Hansen, J. M. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Longman. 2003. 368 p.
22.
Gervasoni, C. A Rentier Theory of Subnational Regimes, Fiscal Federalism, Democracy, and Authoritarianism in the Argentine Provinces, World Politics. 62(2). 2010. P. 302400.
23.
Johannes Gerschewski. The three pillars of stability: legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes. Democratization. 2013. P. 13-38.
24.
ODonnell, G. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics, Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies. 1979. 219 p.
25.
Levitsky, S. and Way, L. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War, New York: Cambridge University Press. 2010. 536 p.
26.
Barker, R. Legitimating Identities: The Self-Presentations of Rulers and Subjects, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2001. P. 41-69.
27.
Saikkonen, IAL. Electoral Mobilization and Authoritarian Elections: Evidence from Post-Soviet Russia. Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press. 2017. P. 51-74.
28.
Frye, T., Reuter, O.J. and Szakonyi, D. Political Machines at Work: Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace, World Politics, 66(2). 2014. P. 195228.