Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2327,   Articles in work: 288 Declined articles: 899 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile


Biosphere and environmental security in Moscow and Moscow Region: current state and prospects
Pryadko Igor' Petrovich

PhD in Cultural Studies

Docent, the department of Social, Psychological, and Legal Communications, National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering

141018, Russia, Moscow Oblast, Mytishchi, Novovomytischinsky Prospekt 86-4

priadcko.igor2011@yandex.ru
Abstract. The object of this research is the environmental conditions of a modern city dweller, while the subject is the measures taken in the cities of Moscow Region and European part of Russia on ensuring the environmental and social security throughout urbanized territories. The article discusses the questions of establishment of biosphere-compatible architecturally designed space in the city. The events hosting by municipalities of Moscow Region (besides the capital metropolis, the article names Mytishchi and Sergiyev Posad) on formation of comfort environment for their residents. The scientific novelty consists in the reference to the innovative ideas of a British sociologist and historian of urban culture – Leo Hollis, as well as the conclusions of Charles Landry. Particularly, the creation of biosphere-compatible secure space subordinates to the ability of urban communities to self-education. Another new aspect lies in the complex character of posing and resolution of the tasks of contemporary urbanism, which is underlines in the works of Hollis, Lenadrt, and Baudrillard. Thus, the notion of “environmental security” is interpreted extensively, taking into account the social adjustment of an individual to city life.
Keywords: city parks, biosphere, technosphere, biosphere compatibility, pollution hydrology, atmospheric pollution, Moscow district, metropolis, urban environment , environmental situation
DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2017.2.23036
Article was received: 17-05-2017

Publish date: 25-05-2017

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here.

References
1.
Shnyrenkov E. A. Razvitie gorodov na osnove realizatsii interesov sotsial'nykh grupp // Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii. 2015. 13. C. 17-29. Rezhim dostupa :http://www.vestnik.isras.ru/summary.html?jid=323 Data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2017.
2.
Andreev I.V. Gradostroitel'naya i transportnaya tematika v predvybornoi kampanii za post mera Moskvy v 2013 g. // Integratsiya, partnerstvo i innovatsii v stroitel'noi nauke i obrazovanii. Sb. tezisov Mezhdunarodnoi nauch. konf. M.: MGSU, 2013. C. 9-11
3.
Andreev I.V. Gradostroitel'nye kontseptsii moskovskikh kommunistov: sotsial'nye i upravlencheskie aspekty // Integratsiya, partnerstvo i innovatsii v stroitel'noi nauke i obrazovanii. Sb. materialov Mezhdunarodnoi nauch. konf. / Otv. red.: T.I. Kvitka, I.P. Molchanova. M.: MGSU, 2015.C. 27-33.
4.
Lendri Ch. Kreativnyi gorod. M.: Klassika-XXI, 2011. 339 s.
5.
Bodriiyar Zh. Gorod i nenavist' // Logos. 1991 2005. Izbrannoe. T. 2. M.: Territoriya budushchego, 2006. S. 437-448.
6.
Pryadko I.P. Vyzovy veka sego i modeli gorodov budushchego // Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. Izdatel'stvo: Sankt-Peterburgskii gosudarstvennyi arkhitekturno-stroitel'nyi universitet. 2013. 6 (41). S. 363-367.
7.
Boltaevskii A.A., Pryadko I.P. Problemy sovremennogo gradoplanirovaniya v svete vyvodov arkhitektoniki // Problemy i napravleniya razvitiya gradostroitel'stva. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. M., 2013. S. 24-28.
8.
Hollis L. Cities are Good for You. The Genius of the Metropolis. by Bloomsbury Press, New York, 2013. 416 p.
9.
Mers'e L.-S. Kartiny Parizha. M.: Progress-Akademiya, 1995. 400 s.
10.
Dyurkgeim E. Sotsiologiya: ee predmet, metod, prednaznachenie. M.: Terra-Knizhnyi klub, 2008. 399 s.
11.
Ekologiya // Podmoskov'e segodnya. 2016. 174(3846). S.20.
12.
Ria.ru/Moscow/20160314/138587282.html
13.
Rossiya v tsifrakh 2011. URL: http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b11_11/IssWWW.exe/Stg/d1/04-03.htm. Data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2017.
14.
Ekologicheskaya obstanovka v Moskve. URL: http://a-portal.moreprom.ru/news+view+155.html. Data obrashcheniya: 20.02.2015.
15.
Buyanova D. Reka neset v tsentr vetki i musor // Metro. 2017. 60(76/3730). S.2.
16.
Uporova N. Zaraza takaya: V vodoemakh Sergieva Posada obnaruzhena kishechnaya palochka // Podmoskov'e segodnya. 30 iyunya 2015. 116 (3541). S.9.
17.
Cherez god potok turistov v prirodnye parki novykh territorii uvelichitsya // Novye okruga. 28.05.2015. 17 (137).
18.
Novikov Yu.V. Okhrana okruzhayushchei sredy. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1987. 287 s.
19.
V Primor'e bol'she net OYaT // Strana ROSATOM. 42 (170). noyabr' 2014. S.7.
20.
Siti-menedzheru Petropavlovska-Kamchatskogo predlozhili uiti. http://www.rg.ru/2015/02/18/reg-dfo/otstavka.html. Data obrashcheniya: 07.03.2015.
21.
Perelet R.A. Ekologicheskaya diplomatiya // Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 1988. 10. S. 92-101.
22.
Davydova E.A., Pryadko I.P. Malomobil'nye gruppy naseleniya v sovremennom megapolise // Sotsiogumanitarnye problemy stroitel'nogo kompleksa. Trudy VI-oi Mezhdunarodnoi i VIII-oi Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. M., 2010. S. 195-202.
23.
Pryadko I.P. Trebovaniya k arkhitekturno-planirovochnym resheniyam uchrezhdenii dosuga v svete problem sotsializatsii i rekreatsionnykh potrebnostei malomobil'nykh zhitelei megapolisa: sotsiologicheskii aspekt // Sotsial'nye i ekonomicheskie problemy gradostroitel'stva i arkhitektury. Trudy desyatoi Vserossiiskoi i vos'moi Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. 2011. S. 235-238.
24.
Iz vystupleniya Predsedatelya Pravitel'stva RF D.A. Medvedeva na Konf. OON po ustoichivomu razvitiyu Rio+20 // Na puti k ustoichivomu razvitiyu RF. 2012. 61. S. 18-21. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.ecopolicy.ru/upload/File/Bulletins/B_61.pdf. Data obrashcheniya: 07.04.2017.
25.
Ishkov A.D., Miloradova N.G. Prinyatie printsipov ekologicheskoi etiki studentami stroitel'nogo universiteta: menedzherami, stroitelyami i gradostroitelyami // Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo. 2015. 3-2 (56-2). S. 788-792.
26.
Pechchei A. Chelovecheskie kachestva. M., 1985.
27.
Leontev M.G. Innovative Approaches in Distance Education in the Field of Environmental Management and Environmental Technologies. MATEC Web of Conferences. Vol. 73 (2016) 07005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20167307005
28.
Miloradova N.G., Ishkov A.D. Environmental ethics as a social, professional and personal value of the students of civil engineering university // Procedia Engineering. 2015. T. 117. S. 246-251.
29.
Trost'yanskaya N. Nasha ulitsa vse krashe // Novye okruga. 2017. 13(29). S.3.
30.
Mudrak S.A. Ekologicheskaya kompetentnost' lichnosti studentov (sravnitel'noe empiricheskoe issledovanie) // Akmeologiya. 2011. 3. S. 83-93.
31.
Bul'var ukrasili elyami // Moskovskii segodnya.2017. 7(60). S.1-2.
32.
Golovanova A.S., Yas'kova N.Yu. Uchet ekologicheskikh trebovanii pri otsenke konkurentosposobnosti // Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya konferentsiya. Sbornik trudov. M.: NIU MGSU, 2013. S. 711.
33.
Boltaevskii A.A. Est' li shans u ekopolisa: vzglyad v budushchee // Urbanistika. 2016. 3. S.44-48.