Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2115,   Articles in work: 280 Declined articles: 925 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

The concept of just war in the theory of international relations: reception of the ideas of H. Grotius in the works of M. Walzer and H. Bull
Volkov Anton Sergeevich

Post-graduate student, the department of Political Analysis, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University; Graduated Master’s Program at MSU and University of Manchester

119234, Russia, Moscow, Leninskiye Gory 1

anton.wolkov@yandex.ru
Abstract.  
The goal of this work consists in description of the key conceptual positions of just war in the works of H. Grotius, Michael Walzer and Hadley Bull. The author comes to a conclusion that M. Walzer and H. Bull share the idea of H. Grotius on the necessity of the rules for war, law and right to war, and thus counterpose themselves to both, the Hobbesian (political realism) and Kantian (liberalism in the theory of international relations) traditions. However, H. Bull cannot be unambiguously considered the supporter of the just war concept, due to the fact that there is no clarity in understanding of which criteria must obtain the just war. Thus, the lack of unity among the authors regarding the criteria of just war is the important issue for the theory. The article examines the history of emergence and evolution of the just war concept in the works of different scholars; determines the key moments in the works of Michael Walzer; demonstrates the evolution of just war concept in the ideas of English school and its founder Hadley Bull. Despite the expectations of such thinkers as Francis Fukuyama about the end of history, the wars around the world have not stopped, whether it is war in Iraq, Syria, or Ukraine. Each party involved in the conflict claims its fairness, which makes the topic of just war especially relevant at present time.
 

Keywords: Hobbesian tradition, political realism, Grotianism, just war, English school, global politics, international relations, Kantian tradition, right to war, justice after war
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2017.6.23281
Article was received: 14-06-2017

Review date: 11-06-2017

Publish date: 16-06-2017

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here.

References
1.
Bull Kh. Anarkhicheskoe obshchestvo: issledovanie problemy poryadka v mirovoi politike. Macmillan, 1995. s. 23-27
2.
Grotsii G. O prave voiny i mira: Reprint. s izd. 1956 g. – M.: Ladomir, 1994. 868 s.
3.
Grabmann M. Vvedenie v Summu teologii sv. Fomy Akvinskogo, Signum Veritatis. 2007. 280 s.
4.
Karter Dzh. Prosto voina ili spravedlivaya voina? The New York Times. 2003. URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/09/opinion/just-war-or-a-just-war.html (data obrashcheniya 10.06.2017)
5.
Kuman'kov A.D. Evolyutsiya kontseptsii spravedlivoi voiny v rabotakh Uoltsera // Etnosotsium № 8 2012. s. 145-150
6.
Uoltser M. Est' voiny, kotorye neobkhodimy, «La Vanguardia», 2004. c.4
7.
Uoltser M. O terpimosti. Perevod s angl. yaz. I. Myurnberg. — M.: Ideya-Press, Dom intellektual'noi knigi, 2000. 160 c.
8.
Uoltser M. Sporya o voine. Iel' Yale University Press, 2004. 224 c.
9.
Uoltser M, Spravedlivye i nespravedlivye voiny, Basic Books, 1977. 361 c.
10.
Shialabba Dzh. Sporya o voine Maikla Uoltsera (obzor) Nation, 2004. URL: http://georgescialabba.net/mtgs/2004/12/arguing-about-war-by-michael-w.html (data obrashcheniya 10.06.2017)