Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1912,   Articles in work: 304 Declined articles: 814 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Peculiarities of protection of the right to speedy trial on the practice of the European Court of Human Rights and Russian courts
Belyakova Anna Vladimirovna

Scientific Associate, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

117245, Russia, Moscow, Bolshaya Cheremushkinskaya Street 34

belyakova.av@gmail.com

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the legal institution of compensation for violation of a right to speedy trial. The object is the social relations emerging in terms of resolution of the issues regarding the award of compensation for violation of a right to speedy trial. The author examines the questions of peculiarities of implementation of the legal regulation of one or another institution, considering the specificities of the legal system of the state. Special attention is given to the characteristics of hearing cases within the law enforcement practice of the European Court of Human Rights and Russian courts in settlement of issues regarding the award of compensation for violation of a right to speedy trial. The main conclusion of the conducted research consists in the need for expanding the list of evaluation criteria within the Russian procedural legislation for the purpose of development of the legal institution of protection of the right to speedy trial to the full extent, taking into account the existing evaluation criteria within the practice of the European Court of Human Rights.  

Keywords: compensation for moral damage, civil process, proceedings in Russia, European Court, evaluation criteria, protection mechanism, legal system, proceedings, speedy trial, arbitration procedure

DOI:

10.25136/2306-9899.2017.4.23720

Article was received:

25-12-2017


Review date:

01-08-2017


Publish date:

16-01-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
«Konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod» (Zaklyuchena v g. Rime 04.11.1950) (s izm. ot 13.05.2004) (vmeste s «Protokolom [№ 1]» (Podpisan v g. Parizhe 20.03.1952), «Protokolom № 4 ob obespechenii nekotorykh prav i svobod pomimo tekh, kotorye uzhe vklyucheny v Konventsiyu i pervyi Protokol k nei» (Podpisan v g. Strasburge 16.09.1963), «Protokolom № 7» (Podpisan v g. Strasburge 22.11.1984))// «Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF», 08.01.2001, № 2, st. 163.
2.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 30.04.2010 № 68-FZ «O kompensatsii za narushenie prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyi srok ili prava na ispolnenie sudebnogo akta v razumnyi srok» // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 04.05.2010. № 94.
3.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 30.04.2010 № 69-FZ «O vnesenii izmenenii v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s prinyatiem Federal'nogo zakona «O kompensatsii za narushenie prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyi srok ili prava na ispolnenie sudebnogo akta v razumnyi srok» // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 04.05.2010. № 94.
4.
Bezborodov Yu.S. Metody mezhdunarodno-pravovoi konvergentsii // Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2015. № 4. S. 30 – 37.
5.
Belyakova A.V. Mekhanizmy sudebnoi i vnesudebnoi zashchity prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyi srok: monografiya. M.: Yustitsinform, 2016. s.168.
6.
Kovalev A.A. Mezhdunarodnaya zashchita prav cheloveka: uchebnoe posobie. M.: Statut, 2013. s.591.
7.
Malyushin A.A. Izmenenie roli sudebnoi praktiki v usloviyakh pravovoi globalizatsii // Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess. 2017. № 1. S. 27 – 32.
8.
Rossiiskii ezhegodnik Evropeiskoi konventsii po pravam cheloveka / M.V. Agal'tsova, A.Yu. Bushev, M.R. Voskobitova i dr. M.: Statut, 2016. Vyp. 2: «Avtonomnoe tolkovanie» Konventsii i «sudeiskii aktivizm». s.656.
9.
Sultanov A.R. Bor'ba za pravo na obzhalovanie sudebnogo resheniya. M.: Statut, 2014. s.527
10.
Unifikatsiya i garmonizatsiya v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave. Voprosy teorii i praktiki: monografiya / Ya.O. Alimova, N.N. Viktorova, G.K. Dmitrieva; otv. red. G.K. Dmitrieva, M.V. Mazhorina. M.: NORMA, INFRA-M, 2016. s.208.
11.
Khropanyuk V.N. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnoe posobie dlya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii/Pod red. professora V.G. Strekozova. – M.: «Dabakhov, Tkachev, Dymov», 1995. S. 290.
12.
Shemeneva O.N. Rol' soglashenii storon v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve. M.: Infotropik Media, 2017. s. 312.