Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2100,   Articles in work: 274 Declined articles: 908 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Domestic violence: power of tradition
Lapteva Lyudmila Evgen'evna

Doctor of Law

Leading Scientific Associate, Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Professor, the department of State and Law, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

123007, Russia, Moscow, Khoroshevskoe Shosse 22, office #102

lelapteva@gmail.com
Abstract. The subject of the article is the examination of various manifestations of domestic violence and search of the historical legal argumentation in favor of the purposefulness and potential for correcting the corresponding social relations through legislation. The research is based on the analysis of national legislation – both, the modern, as well as previously existed at various stages of evolution of the Russian State. In order to prove the thesis that violence with regards to family members is inherent to systemocentric and personicentric societies at different stages of historical development. The authors meticulously reviews such aspects of the topic, as the origins and methods of the struggle against domestic violence with regards to women. The use of comparative-historical and historical-country analysis, allowed saturating the research with the facts that confirm the immanency of family violence to the traditional microsocieties, structured in accordance with the principle of autocratic power of master of the house. The main contribution into the study consists in the thesis on the influence upon the formation of tradition of domestic violence of a number of factors, including the legacy of authoritarian social structure, religious and ethical imperatives, economic ill-being of family and society as a whole. The scientific novelty is defined by the facts testifying to the spread of domestic violence in the world, as well as formulation of propositions based on the global preventative experience, particularly through adopting the corresponding programs of social development and laws on prevention of the domestic violence.
Keywords: Decriminalization, Economic grounds, Protection order, Divorce, Dignity, Psychological abuse, Physical abuse, Tradition, Prevention, Domestic violence
DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2017.9.24125
Article was received: 10-09-2017

Review date: 08-09-2017

Publish date: 19-09-2017

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here.

References
1.
Tarasov I.T. Ob uvazhenii k zhenshchine: Lektsiya, chitannaya v zale Yaroslavskoi dumy 21 noyabrya 1880 g. // Vremennik Demidovskogo yuridicheskogo litseya. Kniga 24. Yaroslavl'. 1881. S. 17-21.
2.
Pletnikov K. Na zashchitu zhenshchiny ot izdevatel'stva // Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost'. 1935. № 11. S. 30.
3.
Mouzos J. Femicide: An overview of major findings, Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice. No. 124. Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, August 1999. Pp. 1-6.
4.
Krug EG et al., eds. World report on violence and health. Geneva, World Health Organization. 2002. P. 125-126.
5.
Zamengof M.F. Prestupnost' starikov// Zhurnal ministerstva yustitsii. 1915. № 4. S. 144-181.
6.
Amenitskii D. Sluchai ubiistva starikom-ottsom rodnogo syna vmeste s ego sem'ei (Iz Instituta sudebno-psikhiatricheskoi ekspertizy) // Pravo i zhizn'. M., 1924. Kn. 7, 8. S. 95-98.
7.
Aparina A. Tezisy vystupleniya na parlamentskikh slushaniyakh (1999). http://www.owl.ru/library/025t.htm
8.
Domostroi. Polnyi tekst. Sil'vestrovskaya redaktsiya. http://bibliotekar.ru/rus/9.htm
9.
Lazovskii N. Lichnye otnosheniya suprugov po russkomu obychnomu pravu//Yuridicheskii Vestnik. 1883. T. 13. № 6. S. 397.
10.
Vestnik tserkovno-obshchestvennoi zhizni. Pril. k № 7 «Pastyrskogo Sobesednika». 1902.
11.
Krasnoperov I.M. Krest'yanskie zhenshchiny pered volostnym sudom. // Sbornik pravovedeniya i obshchestvennykh znanii. Trudy yuridicheskogo obshchestva, sostoyashchego pri imperatorskom Moskovskom universitete. T. 1. SPb. 1893. S. 268-289.
12.
Pobedonostsev K.P. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. Chast' vtoraya: Prava semeistvennye, nasledstvennye i zaveshchatel'nye. http://civil.consultant.ru/elib/books/16/page_18.html
13.
Bobrov D. Po povodu bab'ikh stonov//Yur. Vestnik. 1885. T. 20. Kn. 2. Oktyabr'. S. 318.
14.
Yuridicheskoe polozhenie zamuzhnei zhenshchiny v Anglii v tsarstvovanie korolevy Viktorii // Zhurnal Ministerstva yustitsii. SPb. 1897. № 9.
15.
Grigorovskii S. Sbornik tserkovnykh i grazhdanskikh zakonov o brake i razvode, uzakonenie, usynovlenie i vnebrachnye deti. Izd. 8-e. SPb. 1908. Gl. 5. P. 18. S. 66—67.
16.
Sobranie opredelenii i postanovlenii Svyashchennogo Sinoda Pravoslavnoi Rossiiskoi Tserkvi 1917—1918 gg. Reprint. M. 1994. T. 3. S. 61. T. 4. S. 48.
17.
Subbotina S., Molotov I. Za domashnee nasilie predlagayut sazhat' na 3 goda. Izvestiya. 30 noyabrya 2014: https://iz.ru/news/580116
18.
Petrov I. Remen' stanet legche. Rossiiskaya gazeta. Federal'nyi vypusk. 01.08.2016. № 7037. https://rg.ru/2016/08/01/mizulina-predlozhila-iskliuchit-poboi-chlenov-semi-iz-ugolovnogo-kodeksa.html
19.
Deya Bhattacharya. Domestic violence: Supreme Court verdict on Section 498A puts family honour over women's rights // http://www.firstpost.com/india/domestic-violence-supreme-court-verdict-on-section-498a-puts-family-honour-over-womens-rights-3870627.html
20.
Julia Baird, Hayley Gleeson. Submit to your husbands: Women told to endure domestic violence in the name of God // http://www.abc.net. au/ news/2017-07-18/domestic-violence-church-submit-to-husbands/8652028
21.
Barbara Evans Clements. A History of Women in Russia: From Earliest Times to the Present. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, USA. 2012. 376 p. P. 39.
22.
Women in Law and Lawmaking in Nineteenth and Twentieth-Century Europe. Ed. By Eva Schandevyl. Vrije Universiteit, Brussel, Belgium. 2016. Routledge. London & New York.
23.
Women’s History in Russia: (Re) Establishing the Field. Edited by Marianna Muravyeva and Natalia Novikova. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK. 2014. 250 p.
24.
Galina A. Ogranichenie prav zhenshchin v SShA // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1948. № 6.
25.
Engel'gardt A.N. Pis'ma iz derevni. Pis'mo pyatoe. http://az.lib.ru/e/engelxgardt_a_n/text_0020.shtml
26.
Engel'gardt A.N. Pis'ma iz derevni. Pis'mo vtoroe. http://az.lib.ru/e/engelxgardt_a_n/text_0020.shtml
27.
Ryan F. They’ve endured domestic violence. Now they’re victims of austerity //https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/26/endured-domestic-violence-victims-austerity-sunderland
28.
Muizhnieks N. V obshchestve dolzhen proizoiti kul'turnyi sdvig: nel'zya pooshchryat' i opravdyvat' nasilie. Kommersant. 2 fevralya 2017. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3211703