Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1930,   Articles in work: 305 Declined articles: 749 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Socratic dialogue as a method of problem management
Ivanova Ol'ga

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the department of Economics, Management and Law, South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University

454080, Russia, g. Chelyabinsk, pr. Lenina, 69, aud. 254

74oliva@list.ru
Gnatyshina Elena

Doctor of Pedagogy

 
Professor, Director of the Professional-Pedagogical Institute, South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University
 

454080, Russia, g. Chelyabinsk, pr. Lenina, 69, aud. 254

boss@cspu.ru

Abstract.

The subject of this study is the Socratic dialogue (polylogue) as a form of philosophical practice. The goal is to substantiate the instrumentality of Socratic dialogue in problem management. The author examines the Socratic dialogue as a universal method of problem management, based on clarification in questioning the essence of the problem, and applied in the issued of everyday life alongside the organizations in educational, political and economic spheres. Identifying sequential stages in development of the instrumentality of Socratic dialogue for solution of the problems, along with the original Socratic dialogue, organizational polylogue, and educational dialogue – particular attention is given to the Socratic dialogue as type of philosophical consulting. Author’s special contribution into the study lies in substantiation of reference to the philosophical inquiry of the pragmatically oriented business. The author determines the advantages of implementation of the Socratic dialogue for solving the organizational problems in comparison with other modern forms of philosophical practice (existential consulting, logical-philosophical therapy, philosophical partnership) as the organically synthesizing the logical-gnoseological and communicative-axiological components. The article underlines the communicative nature of the Socratic dialogue, its relevance as an adaptive method for solution of the problems in the conditions of postindustrial society, ad hoc organizations with a tendency to constant growth of the number of problems.

Keywords: philosophical practice, community of researchers, communication, Socratic consulting, Socratic dialogue, essence, problem, inquiry, organizational problems, organizational polylog

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2018.4.24133

Article was received:

08-09-2017


Review date:

20-09-2017


Publish date:

21-04-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Bakhtin M.M. Problemy tvorchestva Dostoevskogo. Kiev, NEXT, 1994. 511 s.
2.
Brenif'e O. Iskusstvo obuchat' cherez diskussiyu. Uchebnoe posobie. – M.: Mozaika-Sintez, 2016. 128 s.
3.
Ivanova O.E. Kommunikatsiya: problema konstituirovaniya smysla // Lichnost'. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo. 2010. T. XII. № 3 (57-58). S. 210-217.
4.
Ivanova O.E. Logiko-osnovannaya terapiya kak instrument upravleniya problemami // Sotsium i vlast'. 2016. № 3(59). S. 36-40.
5.
Ivanova O.E. Problema smysla v kommunikatsii: paradigmal'nyi podkhod: monografiya. Chelyabinsk: Izd-vo Chelyab. gos. ped. un-ta, 2014. 273 s.
6.
Ivanova O.E. Filosofskaya praktika kak obuchenie na protyazhenii vsei zhizni // Sovremennoe obshchestvo i vlast'. 2016. № 4(10). S. 348-352.
7.
Lakhav R. Filosofskaya praktika – quo vadis? // Sotsium i vlast'. 2016. № 1. S. 7-14.
8.
Platon. Alkiviad I / Sobranie sochinenii v 4 t.: T. І / Obshch. red. A. F. Loseva i dr.; Avt. vstupit, stat'i A. F. Losev; Primech. A. A. Takho-Godi; Per. s drevnegrech. – M.: Mysl', 1990. S. 220-267.
9.
Platon. Gorgii / Sobranie sochinenii v 4 t.: T. І / Obshch. red. A. F. Loseva i dr.; Avt. vstupit, stat'i A. F. Losev; Primech. A. A. Takho-Godi; Per. s drevnegrech. – M.: Mysl', 1990. S. 477-573.
10.
Platon. Protagor / Sobranie sochinenii v 4 t.: T. І / Obshch. red. A. F. Loseva i dr.; Avt. vstupit, stat'i A. F. Losev; Primech. A. A. Takho-Godi; Per. s drevnegrech. – M.: Mysl', 1990. S. 418-476.
11.
Toffler E. Shok budushchego: Per. s angl. M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo ACT», 2002. 557 s.
12.
Filosofiya dlya detei. M.: IF RAN, 1996. 241 s.
13.
Yulina N.S. Uluchshenie kachestva myshleniya: «sokraticheskii dialog» i interaktsiya s komp'yuterom / Iskusstvennyi intellekt. Mezhdistsiplinarnyi podkhod. Pod red. D.I. Dubrovskogo i V.A. Lektorskogo. M.: IInteLL, 2006. C. 180-193.
14.
Brenifier O. The Practice of Philosophy with Children. URL: http://www.pratiques-philosophiques.fr/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/The-practice-of-philosophy-with-children-ORIGINAL-1.pdf
15.
Vardzhiiska E. V''zmozhnosti za prilagane na Sokratoviya metod pri prepodavane na filosofiya v uchilishche. URL: http://junior.integra.bg/bg/Socratic_Dialogue/docs/evelina_vardjiska.pdf;
16.
Gronke H., Häußner J. Socratic Coaching in Business and Management Consulting Practice // Practical Philosophy. 2006. Volume 8, Issue 1. R. 28-38.
17.
Heckmann G. Das Sokratische Gespräch: Erfahrungen in philosophischen Hochschulseminaren / Mit einem Vorwort zur Neuausgabe von. Dieter Krohn. Herausgegeben von der Philosophisch-Politischen Akademie. – Frankfurt/M.: dipa-Verlag, 1993. 153 s.
18.
Kessels J. Socrates op de markt: Filosofie in bedrijf. – Amsterdam: Boom, 1997. 251 r.
19.
Leal F., Saran R. A Dialogue On the Socratic Dialogue / Occasional Working Papers in Ethics and The Critical Philosophy. Edited by Patricia Shipley for The Society for the Furtherance of the Critical Philosophy (London). Vol. 2. April 2000. P. 50-61.
20.
Nelson L. Sokratoviyat metod. Predgovor i prev. ot nemski Ts. Torbov. 2-ro izd. S.: Lyubom''drie, 1993. 96 s.