Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1858,   Articles in work: 312 Declined articles: 768 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Analysis of Group Dynamics in the Corporate Culture Training
Pesha Anastasiya Vladimirovna

PhD in Economics

Docent, the department of Labor Economy and Human Resource Management, Ural State University of Economics

620144, Russia, Yekaterinburg, 8 Marta Street 62, office # 455

myrabota2011@gmail.com

 

 
Koropets Ol'ga Anatolevna

PhD in Psychology

Docent, the department of Labor Economy and Human Resource Management, Ural State University of Economics

620144, Russia, Yekaterinburg, 8 Marta Street 62, office # 455

okor78@mail.ru

 

 
Plutova Mariya Igorevna

PhD in Economics

senior lecturer at Ural State University of Economics

620144, Russia, g. Ekaterinburg, ul. 8 Marta, 62, of. 455

MPlutova@yandex.ru

Abstract.

Within the framework of this article, the authors present the results of studying group dynamic indicators during the corporate culture training. The object of the research is group dynamics as a set of processes occurring in a group of training participants. The subject of the research is the possibility of managing group dynamics of the student group through the corporate culture training. The rationale of the research is caused by the fact that there is a growing interest in trainings at high schools today as well as proved efficiency of trainings as an instrument of group dynamics management. Methods include content analysis, training, questionnaire techniques, observation. When processing research results, the authors have also applied descriptive analysis methods for calculating mean values and standard deviation based on trust-mistrust indicators, correlation-regression analysis, and variance analysis in assessing changes in group dynamics and corporate culture groups after the training. The study involved 78 students, 55 third- and fourth-year students who had attended training sessions and 23 second-year students who did not attend training sessions (69 females and 9 males). As a result of the study, the authors confirm their hypothesis that development of a united group of students in the course of the corporate culture training is possible only taking into account group dynamics factors. The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the authors' approach to the corporate culture development from the point of view of group dynamics. 

Keywords: training, values, corporate culture, compatibility, personality, small group, group dynamics, cohesion, trust, group norms

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8701.2018.1.24353

Article was received:

13-10-2017


Review date:

05-10-2017


Publish date:

22-02-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Andreeva G.M. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya. Uchebnik dlya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. M.: Aspekt Press, 2001.-290 s.
2.
Antsiferova L.I. Psikhologicheskaya oposredovannost' sotsial'nykh vozdeistvii na lichnost', ee razvitee i formirovanie // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya sotsial'nogo razvitiya lichnosti M., 1991. S. 5-38.
3.
Baeva L. V. Proektnoe obuchenie v sovremennom vuze: opyt primeneniya standartov CDIO dlya podgotovki studentov sotsiogumanitarnykh napravlenii //Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2014.- 1. 82-89 s.
4.
Bazarov, T. Yu. Psikhologiya upravleniya personalom. Teoriya i praktika : uchebnik dlya bakalavrov / T. Yu. Bazarov. M. : Izdatel'stvo Yurait, 2014. 381 s. Seriya : Bakalavr. Uglublennyi kurs.
5.
Gansuar Kristian, Neretina E. A., Korokoshko Yu. V. Opyt proektno-orientirovannogo obucheniya i organizatsii komandnoi raboty studentov vuza //Integratsiya obrazovaniya. 2015. T. 19. 2 22-30 S.
6.
Dontsov A. I. Psikhologiya kollektiva: Metodologicheskie problemy issledovaniya. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta. 1984. S. 39-61
7.
D'yachkova E. N., Grebenik L. G., Ledovskaya M. E. Ispol'zovanie treningovogo podkhoda v uchebnom protsesse kak innovatsionnoi formy effektivnogo obucheniya studentov vuza //Nauka i obrazovanie: novoe vremya. 2016. . 2. S. 205-212.
8.
Ekimova V. I. Timbilding v studencheskoi auditorii: za i protiv // Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya. 2015. Tom. 4, 2. S. 2027. doi:10.17759/jmfp.2015040203
9.
Kovaleva O. A. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskii trening kak effektivnyi sposob realizatsii kompetentsii, ustanovlennykh federal'nym gosudarstvennym obrazovatel'nym standartom v yuridicheskom obrazovanii //Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2015. . 2-2. S. 552-552.
10.
Krichevskii R.L. Psikhologiya liderstva: Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Statut, 2007. 542s.
11.
Kupreichenko A. B. Psikhologiya doveriya i nedoveriya. M. : Izd-vo Institut psikhologii RAN, 2008 564 s. S. 559-560
12.
Nazarenko M.A., Petrov V.A., Sidorin V.V. Upravlenie organizatsionnoi kul'turoi i eticheskii kodeks vuza // Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. 2013. 4. S. 171-172; URL: https://natural-sciences.ru/ru/article/view?id=31784 (data obrashcheniya: 11.10.2017).
13.
Pel'meneva A. A. i dr. Obuchenie studentov v virtual'noi srede professional'noi deyatel'nosti na primere mezhdistsiplinarnogo treninga //Inzhenernoe obrazovanie. 2016. . 20. S. 178-187.
14.
Petrovskaya L. A. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie problemy sotsial'no-psikhologicheskogo treninga. M. : MGU, 1982. 168 s.
15.
Pesha A. V. Upravlencheskii podkhod k formirovaniyu korporativnoi kul'tury organizatsii sfery obsluzhivaniya: dis. kand. ekon. nauk 08.00.05 ekonomika i upravlenie narodnym khozyaistvom (menedzhment). /A. V. Pesha. Ekb., 2014. 224 s.
16.
Plotnikova N. F. Formirovanie kriticheskogo myshleniya studentov vuza v usloviyakh komandnoi formy organizatsii obucheniya: monografiya / N.F. Plotnikova. Kazan': Izd-vo Kazan. un-ta, 2015. 84 s.
17.
Psikhologiya maloi gruppy: retrospektivnyi nauchno-vspomogatel'nyi ukazatel' otechestvennykh trudov, izdannykh v SSSR i Rossii. 100 let puti / Sost.: A.V. Sidorenkov, V.A. Dorofeev, I.I. Sidorenkova, N.Yu. Ul'yanova, O.Yu. Shipit'ko,E.S. Koval'. Otv. red. A.V. Sidorenkov M.: KREDO, 2014. 268 s.
18.
Ravikovich N. E. Trening komandoobrazovaniya. Tseli, diagnosticheskie metodiki, igry / N. E. Ravikovich. M.: Genezis, 2003. 112 s. (Biznes-psikhologiya).
19.
Reznik S. D., Chernikovskaya M. V., Kamburg V. G. Upravlenie razvitiem organizatsionnoi kul'tury v studencheskoi srede vysshego uchebnogo zavedeniya //Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Povolzhskii region. Obshchestvennye nauki. 2012. . 2.
20.
Safonov V.S. Osobennosti doveritel'nogo obshcheniya. Avtoref dis. kand. psikh. nauk / V.S. Safonov. M., 1978. 21 s.
21.
Sitnikov A. P. Akmeologicheskii trening: Teoriya. Metodika. Psikhotekhnologii /A. P. Sitnikov. M.: Tekhnologicheskaya shkola biznesa, 1996. 428s.
22.
Soldatova G. U., Skripkina T. P. Doverie v sotsial'no-psikhologicheskom vzaimodeistvii / Pod red. T. P. Skripkinoi. Rostov-n/D: YuFU, 2006. 326 s.
23.
Umanskii L. I. K probleme liderstva i ego eksperi304. mental'nogo izucheniya v kontaktnykh gruppakh shkol'nikov i studentov // Voprosy psikhologii kollektiva shkol'nikov i studentov: nauch. trudy. Kursk: Izd-vo KGPI, 1972. S. 5-17.
24.
Chernyshev A. S. Organizovannost' i liderstvo v molodezhnykh 319. gruppakh: teoriya, eksperiment, praktika: izbrannye trudy /A. S. Chernyshev. Kursk: Izd-vo KGU, 2006. 243 s.
25.
Sho R.B. Klyuchi k doveriyu v organizatsii: Rezul'tativnost', poryadochnost', proyavlenie zaboty. M.: Delo, 2000. 272s.
26.
Bales R.F. Die Interactionanalyse: Ein Beobachtungverfaren zur Untersuchung kleiner Gruppen // Beobachtung und Experiment in der Sozialforschung / Hrsg. R. König. Köln, 1972. S. 148-167.
27.
Cartwright D. & Zander A. (eds.). Group Dynamics. Research and Theory. N. Y.: Harper and Row, 1968.
28.
Chapman K. J., Meuter, M., Toy, D., & Write, L. (2006). Can't we pick our own group? The influence of group selection method on group dynamics and outcomes //Journal of Management Education, 30, 557-569.
29.
Davis D., Leinhardt S. The structure of positive interpersonal relations in small groups //Sociological theories in progress. V.2. Boston, 1972, p.218-251.
30.
Gordon Bloom , Diane Stevens , Tamara Wickwire. Expert Coaches' Perceptions of Team Building //Journal of Applied Sport Psychology Volume 15, 2003-Issue 2 Pages 129-143
31.
Izhar Oplatka. A call to adopt the concept of responsible leadership in our schools: some insights from the business literature //International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice. Volume 20, 2017 Issue 4 . Pages 517-524. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2016.1186846
32.
Johnson, M.D., Morgeson, F.P., & Hekman, D. (2012). Cognitive and affective identification: Exploring the links between different forms of social identification and personality with work attitudes and behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 1142-1167
33.
Julie Staggers, Susan Garcia, Ed Nagelhout. Teamwork Through Team Building: Face-to-Face to Online .July 16, 2008;Issue published: December 1, 2008 Volume: 71 issue: 4, page(s): 472-487. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569908325862
34.
Larry K. Michaelsen, Michael Sweet. Team-based learning // New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 8 December 2011. DOI: 10.1002/tl.467
35.
Lawler E.E. Quality Circles after the Fad / Edward E. Lawler, Susan A. Mohrman // Harvard Business Review. 1985. V. 63. P. 63.
36.
Scholters P.R. The Team Handbook. How to use Teams to Improve Quality / Peter R. Scholters. New York, 1986. 360 p.
37.
Zhang X., De Pablos P. O., Xu Q. Culture effects on the knowledge sharing in multi-national virtual classes: A mixed method //Computers in Human Behavior. 2014. T. 31. S. 491-498