Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1930,   Articles in work: 306 Declined articles: 747 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Philosopher and philosophical knowledge in Buddhist tradition of the Gelug School
Donets Andrei Mikhailovich

Doctor of History

Leading Scientific Associate, Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

670031, Russia, the Republic of Buryatia, Ulan-Ude, Sakhyanovoi Street 6

3716@gmail.com
Nesterkin Sergei

Doctor of Philosophy

Leading Scientific Associate, Institute of Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

670047, Russia, the Republic of Buryatia, Ulan-Ude, Sakhyanovoy Street 6

sn3716@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

This article sets an objective of explicating the representations of Buddhists of the Gelug School about who is a philosopher, what is an accurate philosophical knowledge, its role and place in the soteriological system of Buddhism. The authors determine and analyze the key characteristics that define a Buddhist philosopher: “coming to refuge” of Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha; using as true argument (Tibetan –  rtags yang dag) for proper conclusion a reputable opinion (lung); acquisition of assurance in the true idea of Buddhist philosophy as a special form of doctrine through evidence; impartial (Tibetan – ma chags pa, chags med) attitude towards any ideas that blends with confidence in accuracy of the own opinion in such way that both, impartiality and confidence secure each other. The article provides an analysis of the process of philosophical cognition as an essential component of soteriological project of Buddhism. The work is conduced based on the referential Tibetan language sources viewed in the context of living tradition of the Central Asian Buddhism. The authors establish that a Buddhist philosopher of the Gelug tradition by the virtue of prasanga (Tibetan – thal ‘gyur; a particular type of conclusions proposed in response to the opponent’s assertion, due to which, leaning only upon the acknowledged by the opponent assertion, reveals its falsehood), as well as ordinary evidence form a median position of mind, and remaining within the framework of philosophy, solve the task of refuting the false representations. The established true representation and assurance in its validity, possess specific peculiarities that make them suitable for further application in the process of realization of the direct control over the final truth with help of the meditative techniques.

Keywords: education, scholasticism, Gelug, Mahayana, Buddhist philosophy, Tibetan Buddhism, debate, Prasangika, Madhyamaka, personality

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2017.12.24823

Article was received:

24-11-2017


Review date:

25-11-2017


Publish date:

29-11-2017


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Ayusheeva D.V. Osnovnye osobennosti i tendentsii rasprostraneniya tibetskogo buddizma na Zapade // Religiovedenie. 2011. № 4. S. 74-80.
2.
Ulanov M.S. O prichinakh rasprostraneniya buddizma na Zapade v epokhu globalizatsii // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya i sotsial'nye tekhnologii. 2008. № 2. S. 68-72.
3.
Ayakova Zh.A. O buddizme makhany v sovremennom sotsiokul'turnom prostranstve Severnoi Ameriki // Vestnik Kalmytskogo universiteta. 2017. № 1 (33). S. 126-133.
4.
Badmatsyrenov T.B., Dagbaev E.D. Buddiiskie soobshchestva v rossiiskoi sisteme gosudarstvenno-konfessional'nykh otnoshenii // V sbornike: Gosudarstvo, obshchestvo i tserkov': obrazovanie i kul'tura kak osnova obespecheniya natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossii. Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii Konferentsiya provedena v ramkakh prazdnovaniya 80-letiya Novosibirskoi oblasti. 2017. S. 31-35.
5.
Nesterkin S.P. Doktrinal'nye osnovaniya formirovaniya lichnosti v obrazovatel'noi sisteme buddiiskikh monastyrei//Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke. 2016. № 5. S. 185-194.
6.
Ayusheeva D.V. Sovremennoe buddiiskoi obrazovanie v zapadnom mire // Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. 2017. № 5 (13). S. 43-47.
7.
Donets A.M. Buddiiskoe uchenie o meditativnykh sostoyaniyakh v datsanskoi literature. Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo BNTs SO RAN, 2007. Ser. Pax Buddhica.
8.
Donets A.M., Nesterkin S.P. Uchenie o lichnosti v tibetskoi skholastike//Vestnik BNTs SO RAN. 2011. № 1. S. 71-80.
9.
Pupysheva N.V. Sistema tsennostei v buddizme: istochniki tsennostei i urovni razvitiya lichnosti // Vestnik BNTs SO RAN. 2015. № 3. S. 187-199.
10.
Pupysheva N.V. Ontologicheskie osnovy buddiiskoi etiki v simvolike vadzhrayany // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2017. № 4. S. 95-103.
11.
Donets A.M. Struktura dkharmy v svete printsipa sredinnosti. Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo BNTs SO RAN, 2010.
12.
Dreyfus, Georges B. J. The sound of two hands clapping : the education of a Tibetan Buddhist monk. London: University of California Press, Ltd. 470 P.
13.
Nesterkin S.P. Transformatsiya traditsionnoi sistemy buddiiskogo obrazovaniya v kontekste protsessov globalizatsii//Buddizm v kontekste dialoga kul'tur. Sbornik statei. Ulan-Ude, 2015. S. 76-86.
14.
Donets A. M. Sredinnoe poznanie v buddiiskoi traditsii Gelug / otv. red. S. P. Nesterkin. – Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo BNTs SO RAN, 2016. – 329 s.
15.
Dzunba Kunchog Zhigme Vanbo. Dragotsennoe ozherel'e uchenii filosofskikh shkol / Per. s tib. B. B. Dampilona. – Ulan-Ude: Dashichoikhorlin, 1998.
16.
‘Phags pa mi’am ci’i rgyal po ljon pas zhus pa zhes bya ba theg pa chen po’i mdo (Sutra «Voprosy tsarya kinnarov Drumy»). – Tokio, 1992.
17.
‘Phags pa rab kyi rtsal gyis rnam par gnon pas zhus pa shes rab kyi pha rol tu phyin pa bstan pa (Sutra «Voprosy Suvikranta-vikramina»). – Ksil., 91 l.
18.
Zla ba grags pa. dBu ma la ‘jug pa rang ‘grel dang bcas pa bzhugs so («Vvedenie v madkh'yamiku» s avtokommentariem). – Bibliotheca Buddhika IX. – St.-Peters-bourg, 1912.
19.
Blo bzang grags pa’i dpal. bsTan bcos chen po dbu ma la ‘jug pa’i rnam bshad … (Kommentarii na «Vvedenie v madkh'yamiku» Chandrakirti). – Ksil., 267 l.
20.
‘Phags pa yab dang sras mjal ba… (Sutra «Vstrecha ottsa i syna»). – Ksil., 168 l. – sDe dge, 1730.
21.
‘Jam dbyangs bzhad pa’i rdo rje. dBu ma la ‘jug pa’i mtha’ dpyod… (Podrobnoe issledovanie «Vvedeniya v madkh'yamiku»). – Ksil., 442 l.
22.
Ngag dbang nyi ma. Nang pa’i grub mtha’ smra ba bzhi’i ‘dod tshul… (Vozzreniya chetyrekh buddiiskikh filosofskikh shkol). – Ksil., 404 l. – sGo mang, 1971.
23.
bSe Ngag dbang bkra shis. Tshad ma’i dgongs ‘grel…(Uchebnik po «Sobraniyu tem») // Tshad ma’i don rtsa ‘grel. – Mi rigs dpe skrun khang, 1996. – S. 35-336.
24.
dGe ‘dun bstan dar ba. bsTan bcos chen po dbu ma la ‘jug pa spyi don… (Obshchee issledovanie «Vvedeniya v madkh'yamiku» Chandrakirti). – Ksil., 162 l.