Ðóñ Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2086,   Articles in work: 303,  Declined articles: 886 
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Library
 Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile
Back to contents

Karl Marx’s “Capital” in the context of the theory of symbolic capital
Fedotova Natalya Gennad'evna

PhD in Philosophy

Docent, the department of Theory, History and Philosophy of Culture, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University

173015, Russia, g. Velikii Novgorod, ul. B.sankt-Peterburgskaya, 41

fedotova75@mail.ru

Abstract.

One of the trends of modern society is the economism, characterized by the dominance of economic categories that help to gauge and asses the multiform practices. Thus, the modern scientific discourse experiences the pinnacle of popularity of the various “capitals”, particularly symbolic capital, which importance lies in its capability to affect the processes of reality structuring through trust, reputation, prestige, and recognition of someone or something. However, the scientific potential of the theory of symbolic capital that attains new traits is yet to be fully apprehended, which complicates the development of new vectors of research. Due to this fact the subject of this study is the conceptual analysis of the term “capital” and key features revealing its essence, which for the first time were discovered and explained by Karl Marx in his famous work “Capital. Criticism of Political Economy”, as well as their correlation with the theory of symbolic capital. Using the need for theoretical reflection of the essential properties of symbolic capital, the author conducts a comparative analysis of the two concepts: Marxist positions on capital and the modern theory of symbolic capital, founded by Pierre Bourdieu. As a result, the author discovers the four main properties of capital that not only comprise the theoretical basis of the theory of symbolic capital, but also attain the strategic importance in the applied dimension of the claimed problem. The researchers face the prospect of studying the vectors of the use (generating, accumulation, strategic design and development) of symbolic capital for benefit of certain holders – organization, countries, spheres, people, and territories.
 
Keywords: symbolic resources, economism, properties of capital, symbolic capital of place, Karl Marx, symbolic capital, Pierre Bourdieu, capital, symbolic production, symbolic profit

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2018.9.24911

Article was received:

06-12-2017

Review date:

07-12-2017

Publish date:

21-09-2018

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Shtompka P. Sotsiologiya sotsial'nykh izmenenii. M.,1996.
2.
Graver A.A. Simvolicheskie kapitaly putinskoi Rossii v mir-sisteme XXI veka: opyt izucheniya // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2010. ¹ 3 (11). S. 99-118.
3.
Demidova M.A. Sotsial'no-filosofskoe obosnovanie teorii simvolicheskogo kapitalizma // Filosofiya prava. 2015. ¹ 4 (71). S. 20-23.
4.
Fedotova N.G. Territorial'naya identichnost' kak simvolicheskii resurs regiona // Vestnik NovGU. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki». 2015. ¹ 7(90). S.105-109.
5.
Marks K. Kapital. Tom 2, Kn.2: Protsess obrashcheniya kapitala // Marks K., Engel's F., Sochineniya. Izd.2. T. 24. M., 1961.
6.
Burd'e P. Prakticheskii smysl. SPb, 2001.
7.
Burd'e P. Formy kapitala // Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya. Elektronnyi zhurnal. 2002. Tom 3. ¹ 5. S. 60-74
8.
Marks K. Kapital. Tom 3, Kn.3: Protsess kapitalisticheskogo proizvodstva, vzyatyi v tselom // Marks K., Engel's F. Sochineniya. Izd. 2. T. 25, Chast' 2. M., 1962.
9.
Marks K. Kapital Tom 1, Kn. 1: Protsess proizvodstva kapitala // Marks K., Engel's F. Sochineniya. Izd.2. T. 23. M., 1960.
10.
Danilin V.N, Danilina E.I., Gorelov V.I. Razvitie kapitala kak ekonomicheskoi kategorii. Makroekonomika// Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki. 2010. ¹ 4. S.46-52.
11.
Fedotova N.G. Rol' mediakommunikatsii v formirovanii simvolicheskogo kapitala mesta // Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal issledovanii kul'tury. 2017. ¹ 2 (27). S. 65-76.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2017 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Copyright protected by law. Any materials may be published only subject to Publisher's concent. All rights to the work, which was published under the name of our publishing house reserved. No part of the works published in printed or electronic editions, books and periodicals, on disks or digital and magnetic media, or on websites www.nbpublish.com, www.history-illustrated.ru, www.aurora-group.eu, www.e-notabene.ru can not be reproduced, translated into another language, stored in printed form or in any other way turned into another form of data storage, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or other - without the prior agreement and written permission of the publisher. And even if this was allowed to copy the copyright owner, links to the publisher and its publications are required. For the content of advertisements published edition is not responsible. Editors reserve the right to place materials and journal articles in electronic legal systems and other electronic databases. The author can notify the Editor of their disagreement with the similar use of its materials no later than the date of the signing of the numbers in print. Editorial respects the opinion of the authors of the published articles, but their views are not always the opinion of the publisher.