Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1930,   Articles in work: 305 Declined articles: 749 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

On the logics of creative process
Demenev Denis Nikolaevich

PhD in Philosophy

Associate professor of the Departent of Fine Arts at Magnitogorsk State University

455038, Russia, Chelyabinskaya oblast', g. Magnitogorsk, ul. Lenina, 112/2, of. korpus

denis-demenev@mail.ru

 

 

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the logic of creative process. The author analyzes the logics of correlation of micro and macro levels of the creative process: 1) logics of formation of the creative image (or poetization) of global events; 2) logic of structuring (composition) of creative work. Having established in a definitive way, although in a shape of “certain haziness”, the creative image in all its essence dictates or subconsciously pushes towards choosing one or another creative methods. In the course of structuring creative process, the author was guided by the idea of dialectical correlation between the content and form. The elements of complex approach, principle of historicism, methods of analysis and synthesis, generalization, system and sociocultural approaches comprised the methodology of this research. The scientific novelty consists in introduction of the concept of “aesthetic logics” – as the logics of aesthetic activity of an artist, expressed in the interrelation of form and content of his oeuvre that reveals itself through the factor of time. Such logics vary depending on the variation of the creative process itself.

Keywords: conscious, surrealism, realistic art, creative image, macro level, micro level, fantasy, unconscious, logics, aesthetic logics

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2017.12.24932

Article was received:

10-12-2017


Review date:

08-12-2017


Publish date:

11-01-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Bychkov V. V. Metafizicheskii dukh syurrealizma: Khuan Miro // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 3 (99). S. 417-429.
2.
Demenev D. N. Ratsional'nyi uroven', kak odno iz vazhneishikh ontologicheskikh osnovanii khudozhestvennogo protsessa. // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2013. 11. S.1-49. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.11.9505. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_9505.html.
3.
Mamardashvili, M. K. Soznanie kak filosofskaya problema / M. K. Mamardashvili // Problemy filosofii. M.: Nauka, 1990. 10. S. 3.
4.
Bezklubenko S. D. Priroda iskusstva: O nekotorykh storonakh khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva. M.: Politizdat, 1982. 166 s. (Nad chem rabotayut, o chem sporyat filosofy).
5.
Egorov A. G. Problemy estetiki / A. G. Egorov. M.: Sovetskii pisatel', 1977. 463 s.
6.
Shlykova S. P. Transgressiya v avangardnom iskusstve XX nachala XXI vekov: Dis kand. iskusstvovedeniya. Saratov, 2013. 231 s.
7.
Kant I. Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. Tom 5. M., 1966. 564 s.
8.
Gegel'. Estetika. V 4-kh t., t. 1. M.: Iskusstvo, 1968. 330 s.
9.
Freid Z. Khudozhnik i fantazirovanie: Per. s nem. / Pod red. R. F. Dodel'tseva, K. M. Dolgova. M.: Respublika, 1995. 400 s.
10.
Eizenshtein S. M. Izbrannye stat'i. M.: Iskusstvo, 1956. 456 s.
11.
Tukaeva R. A. Izobrazitel'naya real'nost' kak predmet filosofskogo osmysleniya: Dis kand. filos. nauk. Ufa, 2015. 185 s.
12.
Lessing G. E. Gamburgskaya dramaturgiya. M.-L.: Academia, 1936. 518 s.
13.
Vitruvii P. M. ob arkhitekture. L., 1936. 344 s.
14.
Vel'flin G. Klassicheskoe iskusstvo. M.: Airis-press, 2004. 339 s.
15.
Kaplun I. A. Stil' i arkhitektura. M.: Stroiizdat, 1985. S. 7. 232 s.
16.
Tits A. A. Plasticheskii yazyk arkhitektury / A. A. Tits, E. V. Vorob'eva. M.: Stroiizdat, 1986. S. 129. 312 s.
17.
Demenev D. N. O logike tsveta v zhivopisi: ontologicheskii, gnoseologicheskii i aksiologicheskii aspekty / Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2016. 4. S. 568-575. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2016.4.14621.