Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1930,   Articles in work: 305 Declined articles: 749 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Analogy as a philosophical method: does computer really help to cognize the world
Vetushinskiy Aleksandr Sergeevich

Post-graduate student, the department of Ontology and Theory of Cognition, Faculty of Philosophy of the M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

119991, Russia, Moscow, Lomonosovsky Prospekt 27, building #4, office G-324

a.vetushinskiy@gmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

This article is dedicated to the conceptual difficulty occurred in philosophy directly when the latter attempts to comprehend the analogies to which constantly refers. Indeed, in order to understand something obscure, we are force to lean on something that seems common and familiar. As a result, something obscure becomes comprehensible by analogy with what we have seemingly discerned. Thus, human consciousness begins to cogitate by analogy with the computer; society – with the Internet; and world – with the computer game. Is it possible in such instance to rely on philosophy if its results appear to be just a consequence of the selected analogy? In order to answer this question, the author specifically refers to the analysis of media determinism, the unspoken foundation for the modern media research. It is demonstrated that media determinism is inevitable, if behind analogy stands not just a philosophical method, but profound possibility to achieve the “action itself” (in other words, media determinism is inevitable because the analogy is understood improperly). The author concludes that analogy should be acknowledged as the imperative method of philosophical work. Therefore, it is necessary to specifically examine the analogies used by the philosophers, give critical insight, as well as verify if they selected analogies actually lead to significant results, or on the contrary, only confuse the researcher.

Keywords: metaphor, mediadeterminism, philosophical methodology, analogy, media studies, philosophy of media, digital technologies, computer, Internet, video games

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2017.12.24967

Article was received:

12-12-2017


Review date:

12-12-2017


Publish date:

13-12-2017


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Vetushinskii A. Tri interpretatsii naslediya T'yuringa: imenem chego yavlyaetsya iskusstvennyi intellekt? // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2016. №11. S. 22-29.
2.
Donovan T. Igrai Istoriya videoigr. M., 2014. 648 s.
3.
Delanda M. Voina v epokhu razumnykh mashin. Ekaterinburg, M., 2014. 338 s.
4.
Velichkovskii B. Sovremennaya kognitivnaya psikhologiya. M., 1982. 336 c.
5.
Kastel's M. Galaktika Internet: Razmyshleniya ob Internete, biznese i obshchestve. Ekaterinburg, 2004. 328 s.
6.
Khardt M., Negri A. Imperiya. M., 2004. 440 s.
7.
Latur B. Peresborka sotsial'nogo: vvedenie v aktorno-setevuyu teoriyu. M., 2014. 384 c.
8.
Bogost I. How to Do Things with Video Games. Minneapolis, London, 2011. 180 p.
9.
Salin A. K kritike proekta geimifikatsii // Logos. 2015. №1 (103). S. 100-129.
10.
Vetushinskii A. "My zhivem v komp'yuternoi igre": videoigrovaya metafora i ee metafizicheskii potentsial // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2017. №10. S. 164-172.
11.
Mamardashvili M. Vvedenie v filosofiyu // Mamardashvili M. Filosofskie chteniya. SPb., 2002. 832 s.
12.
Maklyuen M. Ponimanie media: Vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka. Zhukovskii, 2003. 464 s.
13.
Maklyuen M. Galaktika Gutenberga: Sotvorenie cheloveka pechatnoi kul'tury. Kiev, 2004. 432 s.
14.
Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva. Razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma. M., 2001. 288 s.
15.
Eko U. Poiski sovershennogo yazyka v evropeiskoi kul'ture. SPb., 2007. 423 s.
16.
Kurtov M. Genezis graficheskogo pol'zovatel'skogo interfeisa. K teologii koda. SPb., 2014. 88 s.
17.
Vetushinskii A. Na puti k simmetrii: kak ontologiya stala ploskoi // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2016. №11. S. 1625-1630.
18.
Kharman G. Chetveroyakii ob''ekt: Metafizika veshchei posle Khaideggera. Perm', 2015. 152 s.
19.
Manovich L. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, London: MIT Press, 2001. p. 335.
20.
Galloway A. The Poverty of Philosophy: Realism and Post-Fordism // Critical Inquiry. 2013. №2. P. 347-366.
21.
Meiyasu K. Dilemma prizraka // Logos. 2013. №2. S. 70-80.
22.
Bostrom N. Iskusstvennyi intellekt. Etapy. Ugrozy. Strategii. M., 2016. 496 s.
23.
Derrida Zh. Belaya mifologiya // Derrida Zh. Polya filosofii. M., 2012. 376 s.
24.
Galanina K., Vetushinskii A. Ontologiya videoigr: ob''ekty, miry i sreda // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2016. №11. S. 1511-1516.
25.
Ivanov A., Mironov V. Universitetskie lektsii po metafizike. M., 2004. 647 s.
26.
Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. SPb., 1994. 408 s.
27.
Elkins Dzh. Issleduya vizual'nyi mir. Vil'nyus, 2010. 534 s.