Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1995,   Articles in work: 337 Declined articles: 791 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

On the Question About The Grounds of Using Civil Institutions in Tax Legal Matters
Akhverdiev Ervin Alibekovich

Paralegal at Bar Association of Volgograd Region “Legion”, Volgograd State University

400021, Russia, Volgograd Region, Volgograd, Kirov's str., 86a, ap. 195

erwin.gelli@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The present article is devoted to the issues related to regulation of tax relations. Modern legal realities demonstrate the tendency to change ways and instruments that are used to resolve tax disputes. The object of the present research is the Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation no. 9 dated March 23, 2017 and Decree of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation No. 39 dated December 8, 2017. These constitutional acts legalise implementation of civil institutions for public interests of tax authorities. Comparative analysis of the existing legislation and aforesaid acts prove that at the present time tax authority has all rights to appeal to courts of general jursdiction to seek compensation for tax arrears using Article 1102 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on unjustifiable enrichment. Moreover, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation allows an opportunity to hold an individual liable for a failure to pay corporate taxes. These approaches are not typical for Russian legal activity as a result of mixed private and public law instruments. Thus, the author concludes that mechanisms described by Tax Code of the Russian Federation are inefficient in achieving goals and tasks of fiscal authorities. At the same time, if this problem is not solved legally, it can create disbalance between public and private interests. 

Keywords: legislation, Civil Code of the Russian Federation, taxation, tax, Tax Code of the Russian Federation, civil institutions, Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, tax arrears, unjustifiable enrichment , tax legal matters

DOI:

10.7256/2454-065X.2018.1.25228

Article was received:

17-01-2018


Review date:

21-01-2018


Publish date:

22-01-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Filatova Irina Ivanovna Nalogovye otnosheniya v grazhdanskom obshchestve // Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy. 2011. №12. S.261-266
2.
Gorbunova O.N. Finansovye pravootnosheniya // Finansovoe pravo. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.: Yurist'', 2000. S. 46-47.
3.
Khimicheva N.I. Finansovye pravootnosheniya, ikh osobennosti i vidy. // Finansovoe pravo. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.: Yurist'', 2001. S. 60-62
4.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 6, Plenuma VAS RF № 8 ot 01.07.1996 «O nekotorykh voprosakh, svyazannykh s primeneniem chasti pervoi Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii»;
5.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 17.06.2004 № 12-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti punkta 2 stat'i 155, punktov 2 i 3 stat'i 156 i abzatsa dvadtsat' vtorogo stat'i 283 Byudzhetnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s zaprosami Administratsii Sankt-Peterburga, Zakonodatel'nogo Sobraniya Krasnoyarskogo kraya, Krasnoyarskogo kraevogo suda i Arbitrazhnogo suda Respubliki Khakasiya»;
6.
«Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (chast' vtoraya)» ot 26.01.1996 № 14-FZ / «Rossiiskaya gazeta», № 23, 06.02.1996, № 24, 07.02.1996, № 25, 08.02.1996, № 27, 10.02.1996;
7.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2017 №9-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti otdel'nykh polozhenii Nalogovogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan E.N. Besputina, A.V. Kul'batskogo i V.A. Chaplanova»;
8.
«Nalogovyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (chast' pervaya)" ot 31.07.1998 N 146-F» / «Rossiiskaya gazeta», № 148-149, 06.08.1998,
9.
Postanovlenie Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka ot 15 sentyabrya 2009 g. Delo «Moskal' protiv Pol'shi» [Moskal v. Poland] (zhaloba N 10373/05)
10.
Kostal'gin D.S. Dzhedaiskie metody tolkovaniya NK RF. – Rezhim dostupa: http://blog.taxadvisor.ru/dzhiedaiskiie-mietody-tolkovaniia-nk-rf/; Data obrashcheniya: 15.01.2018;
11.
Artyukh A.A. Grazhdanskii ili nalogovyi? Kakaya raznitsa, esli byudzhetu nado kushat' (otvet Konstitutsionnogo Suda). – Rezhim dostupa: https://zakon.ru/blog/2017/04/10/grazhdanskij_ili_nalogovyj_kakaya_raznica_esli_byudzhetu_nado_kushat_otvet_konstitucionnogo_suda; Data obrashcheniya: 15.01.2018;
12.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 08.12.2017 N 39-P «Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenii statei 15, 1064 i 1068 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii, podpunkta 14 punkta 1 stat'i 31 Nalogovogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii, stat'i 199.2 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii i chasti pervoi stat'i 54 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan G.G. Akhmadeevoi, S.I. Lysyaka i A.N. Sergeeva» / «Rossiiskaya gazeta», № 291, 22.12.2017;
13.
Shubin D.A. Tezisy vystupleniya advokata Shubina D.A. po delu Akhmadeevoi G.G. v Konstitutsionnom Sude RF. – Rezhim dostupa: https://zakon.ru/blog/2017/11/03/tezisy_vystupleniya_advokata_shubina_da_po_delu_ahmadeevoj_gg_v_konstitucionnom_sude_rf_delo_budet_r; Data obrashchenya: 15.01.2018;
14.
Parygina V. A. Nalogovye pravootnosheniya // Biznes v zakone. 2007. №2. S.18-26