Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1993,   Articles in work: 324 Declined articles: 788 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Categorical modeling of the essential as a continuous reconstruction of existence
Gizha Andrew Vladimirovich

PhD in Philosophy

Docent, the department of Philosophy, Donetsk National Technical University

83120, Ukraine, Donetskaya oblast', g. Donetsk, ul. N. Ostrovskogo, 26, kv. 55

andry@vnet.dn.ua
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

This article examines the conceptual structure of the process of generalizes rationalistic cognition. The two main levels are highlighted: formalizes, mathematically modeled; and open, which is only partially formalized. Philosophical rationality refers to the second level. Such approach allows determining the corresponding to these levels forms of reasoning, as well as the specificities of their actualization. The need for their essential demarcation derives from the fact that each form of reasoning is infinite and self-sufficient in itself, and thus possesses an immanent tendency to extrapolation, which is able to disturb their standard functioning. The main conclusions consist in the statements that the highlighted methods of interpretation and establishment of the truth have a fairly particular applicability. The first level of reasoning is aimed at clarification of regularities and causal connections, which are actually the natural scientific studies. The second one pertains to the problems of open and complex systems – society, history, human, and culture. The peculiarity of reasoning in a non-natural spheres is expressed in the factors of nonlinearity and anticipation. In such case. The subject is capable of escaping the sphere of repressive-compulsory effect of the various types of determinations and shift from the prehistory to the accrual form of historical development. Philosophical categories whereas are viewed as the modeling cognitive-existential structures being in the state of dialogical establishment.

Keywords: determinism, rationalism, existence, history, reason, concept, modeling, indeterminism, freedom, subject

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2018.9.25242

Article was received:

20-01-2018


Review date:

21-01-2018


Publish date:

21-09-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Chernyakova N.S. Ponyatiya kak invariantnaya forma myshleniya / URL: http://publikacia.net/archive/uploads/pages/2016_10_1/63.pdf
2.
Marks K. Tezisy o Feierbakhe / K. Marks, F. Engel's // Soch., 2-e izd., t. 3.-S. 1—4.
3.
Khaidegger M. Chto znachit myslit'? / M. Khaidegger // Razgovor na proselochnoi doroge. – M. : Vyssh. shk., 1991. – S. 134-145.
4.
Lenin V.I. Materializm i empiriokrititsizm // PSS., izd. 5, t. 18. – 525 s.
5.
Geizenberg V. Fizika i filosofiya / V. Geizenberg.-M. : Nauka, 1989. – S. 3-132.
6.
Gegel' G.V.F. Nauka logiki / G.V.F. Gegel'. – SPb : Nauka, 1997. – 800 s.
7.
Bugrova T.I. Kategorii myshleniya estestvoznaniya i filosofii: fenomen transformatsii / Avtoref. dis. ... kandidata filosofskikh nauk : 09.00.01. Saratov, 2013 / URL: https://dlib.rsl.ru/viewer/01005542238#?page=1
8.
Maidanskii A.D. Ponyatie myshleniya u Il'enkova i Spinozy / VF., № 8, 2002. – S. 163-173.