Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1912,   Articles in work: 304 Declined articles: 814 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Legal Regulation of Using Technical Intelligence Equipment in France
Litvinov Ivan Mikhailovich

PhD in Law

Associate Professor at the Department of Copyright and Environmental Law of Dmitry Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia 

125047, Russia, Moscow, Miusskaya ploshchad', 9, room 601

agilon@ya.ru

 

 

Abstract.

In 2015 - 2017 the French Republic was shaken by a series of terrorist attacks and hundreds of deaths. Of course, those crimes happened for many reasons including imperfection of the national security system. One of the steps towards improving the national security system was the expansion of competences of the French police and internal intelligence agencies to restrict a constitutional right to personal privacy in France. The methodological basis of the research implies the dialectical research method, systems analysis, formal law and comparative law methods, etc. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author describes a French model of restriction of rights to negotiation secrecy as well as particularities of control over activity performed by special services and law-enforcement agencies in this sphere. The author concludes that presently France practices two mechanisms of restriction of the right to personal privacy, administrative mechanism (interceptions administratives, interceptions de sécurité) and criminal procedure (interceptions judiciaires). Noteworthy that the procedure of administrative seizure and the mechanism of control over using technical intelligence equipment for administrative purposes create grounds for abuse of the law by French law-enforcement agencies and special services because they could interefere with negotiations or talks of any individual disregarding the fact whether there is a proof of his or her implication in a crime. 

Keywords: administrative interception, French Republic, technical intelligence, internal intelligence, counteraction to terrorism, terrorism, national security, national commission, restriction of rights, supervisory authority

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7543.2018.1.25276

Article was received:

14-02-2018


Review date:

25-01-2018


Publish date:

13-03-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Konstitutsii zarubezhnykh gosudarstv. Velikobritaniya, Frantsiya, Germaniya, Italiya, Evropeiskii soyuz, Soedinennye Shtaty Ameriki, Yaponiya. Uchebnoe posobie. - 8-e izd., ispravl. i dop. - M.: Infotropik Media, 2012. - 640 s.
2.
Konstitutsii zarubezhnykh gosudarstv. Uchebnoe posobie / Sost.: Maklakov V.V.. - 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. - M.: BEK, 2002. - 592 c.
3.
Loi 73-1227 du 31 decembre 1973 autorisant la ratification de la convention Europeenne de sauvegarde des droits de l`homme et des libertes fondamentales et des protocoles additionnels nos 1,3,4 et 5 // JORF du 3 janvier 1974, P. 67.
4.
Zhilkin V.A. Perspektivy i puti resheniya problemy soblyudeniya prava na tainu korrespondentsii v kontekste bor'by s prestupnost'yu v Finlyandii // Yuridicheskaya nauka. 2015. 3. S. 92-97.
5.
Kryuslen (Kruslin) protiv Frantsii. Reshenie Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka ot 24 aprelya 1990 g. // Dostup iz sprav.-prav. sistemy Garant.
6.
Loi 91-646 du 10 juillet 1991 relative au secret des correspondances émises par la voie des communications électroniques // Le service public de la diffusion du droit par l'Internet URL: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000173519 (data obrashcheniya: 23.08.2017).
7.
Loi 2006-64 du 20 janvier 2006 relative à la lutte contre le terrorisme et portant diverses dispositions relatives à la sécurité et aux contrôles frontaliers // JORF 0020 du 24 janvier 2006. P. 1129.
8.
Popov A.S. General'naya direktsiya vnutrennei bezopasnosti: Politicheskie bar'ery v deyatel'nosti frantsuzskoi spetssluzhby // Obshchestvo, politika, ekonomika, pravo. 2017. 6. S. 19-22.
9.
Cornevin C. Attentats de Paris: le scénario bien préparé des frères Kouachi et d'Amedy Coulibaly [Elektronnyi resurs] // Le Figaro. 2015. URL: http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2015/03/01/01016-20150301ARTFIG00151 -attentats-de-paris- le-scenario-bien-prepare-des-freres-kouachi-et-d -amedy-coulibaly.php (data obrashcheniya: 17.05.2017). Millot O., Devin W.L. La galaxie des complices dAmedy Coulibaly [Elektronnyi resurs] // Libération. 2015. URL: http://www.liberation.fr/societe/2015/06/07/la-galaxie-des-complices-d-amedy-coulibaly _1324922 (data obrashcheniya: 05.06.2017).
10.
Loi 2015-912 du 24 juillet 2015 relative au renseignement // JORF 0171 du 26 juillet 2015. P. 12735. Loi 2017-258 du 28 février 2017 relative à la sécurité publique // JORF 0051 du 1 mars 2017 texte 3.
11.
Loi 2016-731 du 3 juin 2016 renforçant la lutte contre le crime organisé, le terrorisme et leur financement, et améliorant l'efficacité et les garanties de la procédure pénale // JORF 0129 du 4 juin 2016 texte 1.
12.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 12.08.1995 144-FZ "Ob operativno-rozysknoi deyatel'nosti": v red. Federal'nogo zakona ot 06.07.2016 374-FZ // Ros. gaz. 2016. 08 iyulya. Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii" ot 18.12.2001 174-FZ: v red. Federal'nogo zakona ot 31.12.2017 501-FZ // Ros. gaz. 2018. 09 yanvarya.
13.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 06.03.2006 35-FZ" O protivodeistvii terrorizmu": v Federal'nogo zakona red. ot 06.07.2016 374-FZ // Dostup iz sprav.-prav. sistemy Garant.
14.
Federal'nyi konstitutsionnyi zakon ot 30.01.2002 1-FKZ "O voennom polozhenii": v red. Federal'nogo konstitutsionnogo zakona ot 01.07.2017 2-FKZ // Dostup iz sprav.-prav. sistemy Garant.