Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1995,   Articles in work: 337 Declined articles: 791 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

The reexamination stage of the passed rulings and decisions on cases of administrative legal violations from the perspective of the principle of legal certainty
Derbysheva Ekaterina Aleksandrovna

Senior Educator, the department of Public Law, Liberal Arts University

620041, Russia, Sverdlovskaya oblast', g. Ekaterinburg, ul. Zheleznodorozhnikov, 3

krolik7507@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the legal norms of the Article 30 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses, which regulates reexamination of the rulings and decisions on administrative violations, from the perspective of their correspondence with the requirements and principles of legal certainty in its procedural aspect. The article expounds the content of such requirement of the principle of legal certainty as cogency of court ruling. The questions of correspondence of the reexamination stage of the rulings and decisions on administrative violations to the requirements of the principle of legal certainty are being examined in comparison to similar stages in civil, criminal and arbitration procedure. The author comes to the conclusion that the administrative procedural legislation in the Russian Federation pertaining to reexamination of passed rulings and decisions on administrative violations, unlike the procedural legislation of other branches, does not meet such requirements of the principle of legal certainty as presence of the circle of subjects of appeal, restriction of multiple supervisory authorities, set period for appeal, and presence of the institutions of newly discovered circumstances.

Keywords: complaint resolution, reviewing authority, the ECHR, of the constitutional Court, the persuasive power of judicial decisions, legal certainty, principle of law, administrative proceedings, party to the proceedings, of the administrative code

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2018.2.25336

Article was received:

05-02-2018


Review date:

02-02-2018


Publish date:

13-03-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Gracheva M.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie peresmotra postanovlenii i reshenii po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: k istorii voprosa // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2012. № 9. S. 34-39.
2.
Il'in A.V. Nadzornoe proizvodstvo po KoAP RF i printsip glasnosti // Zakon. 2013. № 5. S. 145-151.
3.
Kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ (red. ot 31.12.2017) // Ross. gaz. 2001. 31 dekabrya.
4.
Knyazeva I.N. Poryadok peresmotra vstupivshikh v zakonnuyu silu postanovlenii po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: voprosy sovershenstvovaniya // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2015. № 4. S. 31-35.
5.
Lituchaya S.E. Oprotestovanie vstupivshikh v zakonnuyu silu aktov administrativnykh organov // Zakonnost'. 2015. № 4. S. 13-14.
6.
Maslennikov M.Ya. Perspektivy unifikatsii pravil peresmotra postanovlenii po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2004. № 1. S. 32 – 33.
7.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 13.05.2010 № 634-O-O [Elektronnyi resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tant Plyus».
8.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 20 noyabrya 2014 g. № 2629-O [Elektronnyi resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
9.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 25 fevralya 2016 g. № 249-O [Elektronnyi resurs]. Dokument opublikovan ne byl. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
10.
Pan'shin D.L., Dresvyannikova E.A. Poryadok i sroki vstupleniya v zakonnuyu silu postanovlenii po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2013. № 12. S. 1088 – 1091.
11.
Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti punkta 1 chasti tret'ei stat'i 31 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s zaprosom Leningradskogo oblastnogo suda: postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 11.05.2017 № 13-P // Ross. gaz. 2017. 24 maya.
12.
Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti stat'i 19 Federal'nogo zakona «O vvedenii v deistvie Zhilishchnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii» v svyazi s zhaloboi grazhdanina A.M. Bogatyreva: postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2015 № 5-P // Ross. gaz. 2015. 06 iyunya.
13.
Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenii statei 16, 20, 112, 336, 376, 377, 380, 381, 382, 383, 387, 388 i 389 Grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s zaprosom Kabineta Ministrov Respubliki Tatarstan, zhalobami otkrytykh aktsionernykh obshchestv «Nizhnekamskneftekhim» i «Khakasenergo», a takzhe zhalobami ryada grazhdan: postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 05.02.2007 № 2-P // Ross. gaz. 2007. 14 fevralya.
14.
Po delu «Sovtransavto Kholding protiv Ukrainy» (zhaloba N 48553/99): postanovleniya ESPCh ot 25 iyulya 2002 goda // Byulleten' Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka, № 1, 2003.
15.
Po delu «Ryabykh protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloba № 52854/99): postanovlenie ESPCh ot 24 iyulya 2003 goda // Byulleten' Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka, № 12, 2003.
16.
Po delu «Fedorov protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloba № 63997/00): postanovlenie ESPCh ot 26 fevralya 2009 // Byulleten' Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka, № 2, 2010.
17.
Po delu «Radchikov protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloba № 65582/01): postanovlenie ESPCh ot 24 maya 2007 // Byulleten' Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka, № 10, 2007.
18.
Po delu «Votintseva protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloba № 44381/04): postanovlenie ESPCh ot 11 fevralya 2010 // Byulleten' Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka, № 6, 2010.
19.
Po delu «Kononenkova i drugie «pensionery-l'gotniki» protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii»: postanovlenie ESPCh ot 23 sentyabrya 2010 // Byulleten' Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka, № 9, 2011.
20.
Po delu «Botskalev i Rostovskaya protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii i 42 drugikh dela «pensionerov-l'gotnikov»: postanovlenie ESPCh ot 26 noyabrya 2009 // Byulleten' Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka, № 5, 2010.
21.
Po delu «Arshinchikova protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloba № 73043/01): postanovlenie ESPCh ot 29 marta 2007 // Byulleten' Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. № 9, 2008.
22.
Po delu «Seregina protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloba № 12793/02): postanovlenie ESPCh ot 30 noyabrya 2006 // Rossiiskaya khronika Evropeiskogo Suda, № 4, 2008.
23.
Po delu «Kot protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloba № 20887/03): postanovlenie ESPCh ot 18 yanvarya 2007 // Byulleten' Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka, № 5, 2008.
24.
Po delu «Kuznetsova protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloba № 67579/01): postanovlenie ESPCh ot 07 iyunya 2007 // Byulleten' Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka, № 9, 2008.
25.
Po delu «Pravednaya protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloba № 69529/01): postanovlenie ESPCh ot 18 noyabrya 2004 // Byulleten' Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka, № 5, 2005.
26.
Po delu «Koloskova protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloba № 53051/08): postanovlenie ESPCh ot 21 oktyabrya 2010 // Byulleten' Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka, № 1, 2012.
27.
Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniya, soderzhashchegosya v abzatsakh chetvertom i pyatom punkta 10 stat'i 89 Nalogovogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii, v svyazi s zhaloboi obshchestva s ogranichennoi otvetstvennost'yu «Varm»: postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 17.03.2009 № 5-P // Ross. gaz. 2009. 01 aprelya.
28.
Salishcheva N.G., Yakimov A.Yu. Struktura proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (stadii peresmotra dela i ispolneniya resheniya po delu) // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2016. № 6. S. 44-53.
29.
Cidorenko A.I. Printsip pravovoi opredelennosti v sudebnoi praktike: implementatsiya reshenii evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. Avtoref. dis. … kand. nauk. Perm', 2016. S.12.
30.
Stepanova O.A. Realizatsiya printsipa sostyazatel'nosti v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2013. № 1. S. 57-60.
31.
Khazanov S.D. Obshchaya kharakteristika stadii peresmotra v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2004. № 10. S. 69 – 80.
32.
Kholopova E.N., Pan'kin A.A. Pridanie sub''ektu administrativnoi yurisdiktsii statusa uchastnika proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh kak sposob realizatsii printsipa sostyazatel'nosti (na primere pogranichnykh organov) // Yuridicheskii mir. 2013. № 3. S. 35-39.
33.
Yakimov A.Yu. O primenenii sud'yami sudov obshchei yurisdiktsii nekotorykh polozhenii Kodeksa RF ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2005. № 3. S. 37-40.