Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1993,   Articles in work: 324 Declined articles: 788 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Positive provocation in sociocultural sphere. The difference between positive and negative provocation.
Tumskiy Stanislav Vyacheslavovich

PhD in Philology

Docent, the department of English Language, Moscow State Institute of International Relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia

119454, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Prospekt Vernadskogo, 76

statum@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the positive provocation, its essence, types, structure, causes, riskiness, as well as the models of positive provocation in sociocultural environment. The object of this research is the provocations, the subject of which desires to achieve positive result for itself and the object of provocation. The author examines the various cases of application of provocation in the areas of philosophy, art, literature, education and social advertising; as well as the diverse models of the use of positive provocation in postmodern society. A conclusion is made that it is caused by the desire of provocateur to motivate the object of provocation for actions, beneficial to both, the subject and the object. The scientific novelty lies in systemic consideration of the forms of positive provocation at the various social levels; as well as in substantiation of conclusion that the positive provocation can be of altruistic nature and carry social importance, is not a method of causing distress, and requires a high level of reflexivity form the provocateur. The relevance of this article is justified by the broad distribution of prevocational practices in modern world and the need for their examination in the negative and positive aspect. The author formulates the definition of positive provocation, and concludes that the instruments of positive provocation at the microsocial level are trust, dishonesty, concealment of true intentions; while at the macrosocial level – the emotional pressure. The positive and negative provocation are ambivalent: negative can become positive, or the other way around, depending on the circumstances.  

Keywords: emotional impact, subtle influence, postmodern society, motivation, quasinegative provocation, quasipositive provocation, positive provocation, social interaction, manipulation, risk

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7144.2018.9.25341

Article was received:

18-09-2018


Review date:

18-09-2018


Publish date:

21-09-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Nazarova E.A. Provokatsii v sredstvakh massovoi kommunikatsii // Provokatsiya: sfery kommunikativnogo proyavleniya. M: Rusains, 2016. C. 73–89.
2.
Dmitriev A.V. Provokatsiya: sotsiofilosofskie ocherki. Monografiya /A.V. Dmitriev, A.A. Sychev. – M.: TsSPiM, 2017. – 336 s.
3.
Glukhova A.V. Politicheskaya provokatsiya: priroda, kontekst, raznovidnosti // Provokatsiya: sfery kommunikativnogo proyavleniya. M: Rusains, 2016. C. 39–72.
4.
Byl'eva D.S. Provokatsiya kak oruzhie informatsionnoi voiny v Internete / D.S. Byl'eva // Peterburgskaya vesna kul'tury: materialy XIV mezhdunarodnogo foruma, 19-20 maya 2016 g. Federal'noe gosudarstvennoe avtonomnoe obrazovatel'noe uchrezhdenie vysshego obrazovaniya "Sankt-Peterburgskii politekhnicheskii universitet Petra Velikogo". - Sankt-Peterburg, 2016. C. 90–92.
5.
Dmitriev A.V., Zadorozhnyuk I.E. Istolkovanie fenomena provokatsii: traektoriya slova i (khudozhestvenno-literaturnaya) istoriya sluchaev / A.V. Dmitriev, I.E. Zadorozhnyuk // Sotsial'nyi mir cheloveka: materialy VI mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Chelovek i mir: mirosozidanie, konflikt i mediatsiya v interkul'turnom mire», 14-16 aprelya 2016 g. - Izhevsk: OOO Izdatel'skii dom "ERGO", 2016. C. 34–37.
6.
Fateeva N.A. Art-rynok kak provokatsiya iskusstva // Voprosy kul'turologii. M.: Izdatel'skii dom "Panorama", 2008. № 7. C. 49–51.
7.
Sychev A.A. Provokatsiya v istorii filosofii // Gumanitarnyi vektor. 2017. T. 12, № 1. C. 113–122.
8.
Hjort M. The Problem with Provocation: Lars von Trier, Enfant Terrible of Danish Art Film // Kinema: A Journal for Film and Audiovisual Media. Fall 2011. P. 6-26.
9.
Spiridonova M.Yu. Khudozhestvennaya provokatsiya kak sredstvo deavtomatizatsii soznaniya chitatelya (na primere romanov «Otrilogii» Dmitriya Bykova) // Vestnik Severo-kavkazskogo gumanitarnogo instituta. 2012. № 1. S. 207–211.
10.
Sychev A.A. Provokatsiya mezhdu teoriei i zhizn'yu // Provokatsiya: sfery kommunikativnogo proyavleniya. M: Rusains, 2016. S. 18–38.
11.
Sychev A.A. Provokatsiya v istorii iskusstva // Vestnik Permskogo natsional'nogo issledovatel'skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Ser.: kul'tura, istoriya, filosofiya, pravo. 2017. № 4. S. 15–27.
12.
Dmitriev A.V. Provokatsiya: konservativnaya interpretatsiya // Poisk: Politika. Obshchestvovedenie. Iskusstvo. Sotsiologiya. Kul'tura. 2017. № 3 (62). S. 48–55.
13.
Sharkov F.I. Kommunikativnaya provokatsiya ili provokatsiya v teorii i praktike kommunikatsii (razmyshleniya o kommunikativnoi sostavlyayushchei provokatsii) // Kommunikologiya. 2017. T. 5, № 4. S. 167–177.
14.
Rozin V.M. Stanovlenie antichnogo myshleniya: (metodologicheskie, fenomenologicheskie, tekhnologicheskie i institutsional'nye aspekty) // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 3 (75). S. 319–328.
15.
Mills J. Better Teaching through Provocation // College Teaching. 1998. Vol. 46, № 1. P. 21–25.
16.
Krasikov V.I. Intellektual'naya provokatsiya kak sposob aktivizatsii interesa k osvoeniyu filosofii // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2017. № 1. S. 118–126.
17.
Nazarova E.A. Provokatsii v SMI i ikh vospriyatie molodezhnoi auditoriei // Kommunikologiya. 2017. T. 5, № 3. S. 159–168.
18.
Sait proekta sotsial'noi reklamy “Vse ravno?!”. Kampanii. Bezopasnost'. Kakoe kreslo vyberesh'? - URL: http://vse-ravno.net/campaigns/security/kakoe-kreslo-vyberesh (data obrashcheniya 21.08.2018).
19.
Tumskii S.V. Provokatsiya kak sotsial'noe deistvie: opredelenie fenomena v kontekste krossdistsiplinarnogo analiza. // Sotsiodinamika. 2017. № 8. S. 1–11.