Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1986,   Articles in work: 275 Declined articles: 858 
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Relevant questions of interpretation of legal norms in settling a labor dispute in court
Osina Dina

Educator, the department of Theory of Law and Comparative Jurisprudence, Moscow State University of International relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

119454, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Prospekt Vernadskogo, 76


Based on the example of a specific labor dispute on employment reinstatement, this article examines the legal consequences of illegal dismissal; limits of applicability of Part 5 of the Article 394 of Labor Code of the Russian Federation and court’s responsibility to redraft the grounds and (or) reasons of dismissal; whether the court is entitled to settle the dispute beyond the worker’s claim of employment reinstatement; what implies the continuation of work in terms of reorganization. The covered questions are illustrated with the examples form judicial practice, which additionally increases the relevance of the work of practicing lawyers in the area of labor law. The author underlines the presence of ambiguous approaches towards the interpretation of various legal categories in the Russian labor law that inevitably results in the emergence of a significant number of labor disputes. Thus, a conclusion is made on the need for regulation of the contested issues at legislative level or through acquisition of interpretations of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation regarding order of application of one or other positions of the labor and civil procedural legislation.

Keywords: liquidation of a legal entity, limitation of consideration of a case, job function, continuation of work, change of grounds for dismissal, reinstatement in a job, dismissal, Labor code, court interpretation, labor dispute



Article was received:


Review date:


Publish date:


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

Ofitsial'nyi sait Verkhovnogo Suda RF. Elektronnyi resurs. Rezhim dostupa:, data obrashcheniya: 09.01.2018.
Rossiiskaya gazeta №6982 (114). Elektronnyi resurs. Rezhim dostupa:, data obrashcheniya: 09.01.2018.
Reshenie Maloderbetovskogo raionnogo suda Respubliki Kalmykiya ot 29.04.2016 po delu № 2-138/2016.
Reshenie Maloderbetovskogo raionnogo suda Respubliki Kalmykiya ot 22.07.2016 po delu № 2-282/2016.
Reshenie Maloderbetovskogo raionnogo suda Respubliki Kalmykiya ot 02.12.2016 po delu № 2-475/2016.
Reshenie Maloderbetovskogo raionnogo suda Respubliki Kalmykiya ot 30.05.2017 po delu №2-121/2017, apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kalmykiya ot 17.08.2017 po delu №33-727/2017, opredelenie sud'i kassatsionnoi instantsii Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kalmykiya ot 23.11.2017 po delu №4G-273/2017.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 17.03.2004 № 2 (p.28), opredelenie Sudebnoi kollegii po grazhdanskim delam Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 30.05.2008 № 78-V08-5, apellyatsionnye opredeleniya Verkhovnykh Sudov Respubliki Kalmykiya ot 06.09.2012 po delu № 33-604/2012, Respubliki Bashkortostan ot 26.02.2015 po delam № 33-1950/2015 i № 33-1878/2015, Respubliki Severnaya Osetiya – Alaniya ot 03.08.2010 po delu № 33-1018/2010, Bryanskoi oblasti ot 09.09.2014 po delu № 33-2872/2014, opredeleniya Primorskogo kraevogo suda ot 23.09.2015 po delu № 33-8582/15, ot 22.09.2015 po delu № 33-8512, ot 29.07.2015 po delu № 33-6429/15 i ot 28.07.2015 po delu № 33-6356.
Mironov V.I. Trudovoe pravo: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. – SPb.: Piter, 2009. Sm.: glava 9, § 25, str. 344. SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».