Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1912,   Articles in work: 304 Declined articles: 814 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

The West and the East in a specific historical context
Beishenova Aisulu Tilekovna

PhD in Philosophy

Docent, the department of Philosophy and Humanitarian Disciplines, Kyrgyz State University named after I. Arabayev

720026, Kirgiziya, g. Bishkek, ul. Razzakova, 51

aisulu_air@yahoo.com

 

 

Abstract.

This article identifies the factors that to one or another extent affected the establishment of the traditional paradigms in the West and the East, reveals the reasons of contraposition and nonoccurrence of these concepts, as well as the origin of discrepancies of the dissenting concepts. Currently, the generally accepted fact is the difference of the socioeconomic and cultural peculiarities of the West and the East that exists in a constant struggle, however implicating each other’s presence. And in order to understand this process, it is necessary to be able to differentiate the concepts of “West” and “East”. Depending on the goal, methodological approach, and certain perspective, the West and the East can be differentiated in a variety of ways: either civilizational approach towards the history of social development, or the naturalistic approach. The author underlines that the assessment of certain phenomenon or a large combination of facts and relation to them are significantly defined by the multiplicity of external circumstances, real state of the things, balance of forces of the adversaries, purposefulness, current and strategic goals, interests of people and the states; and much lesser the generous search for the scientific truth. On the contrary, the truth is often necessary for increasing the efficiency of implemented actions, due to which it can be demanded in defiance of the current goals and short-run interest, through which pierces the scientific analysis.

Keywords: context, phenomenon, culture, tradition, civilization, globalization, paradigm, approach, East, West

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2018.2.25384

Article was received:

15-02-2018


Review date:

08-02-2018


Publish date:

18-02-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Kipling, R. Izbrannoe. M., 1980. S. 460.
2.
Selishchev, A.S., Selishchev, N.A. Kitaiskaya ekonomika v XXI veke. SPb.: Piter, 2004. S. 78.
3.
Bessonov, B.N.Sotsial'nye i dukhovnye tsennosti na rubezhe II i III tysyacheletii.-M.: Norma, 2006.- 320 S.
4.
Bell, D.Epokha razobshchennosti. Razmyshleniya o mire KhKhI veka.-M.:Svobodnaya mysl', 2007.-303 S.
5.
Volodin, A.G., Shirokov, G.K.Globalizatsiya: istoki, tendentsii, perspektivy//Polis, 1999.-5.-S. 83-93
6.
Klein, L.Globalizatsiya: vyzov natsional'nym ekonomikam// Problemy teorii i praktika upravleniya.-1998.-6.-S. 44-49
7.
Kosopalov,N.Globalizatsiya: Sushchnostnye i mezhdunarodno-politicheskie aspekty//Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2001.-3.-S. 69-73
8.
Bromlei,Yu.A.Etnosotsial'nye protsessy:teoriya,istoriya, sovremennost'.-M.:Nauka,1987.-334 S.
9.
Globalizatsiya [Elektronnyi resurs].-Rezhim dostupa:http://ru.wikipedia.org?wiki/Globalizatsiya-zaglavie s ekrana.