Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1917,   Articles in work: 304 Declined articles: 813 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Some Issues of the Legal Institution of Relief from Administrative Responsibility
Sidorov Eduard Tomovich

PhD in Law

Professor at the Department of Administrative Law and Investigative Activities of Internal Affairs Bodies of Kikotya Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (Moscow Branch) 

143130, Russia, Moscow region, pgt. Tuchkovo, ul. Pobedy, 2-4

set1965@yandex.ru

 

 
Tarasov Aleksandr Yur'evich

PhD in Law

Head of the Department of the Activities of the State Traffic Safety Inspectorate and Information Technologies of Kikotya Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation (Moscow Region Branch)

143142, Russia, Tuchkovo, ul. Lebedenko, 36A, of. 8

7431131@mail.ru

 

 

Abstract.

The authors of this article examine problems that may arise in the process of relief from administrative responsibility. The subject of the research is the legal rules that regulate the order and procedure for relieving an entity from administrative responsibility as a result of an insignificance of an administrative offense. The object of the research is the legal relations arising between law-enforcement authorities and entities that are held liable for administrative offenses. The authors analyze Articles 2.9, 6.8 and 6.9 of The Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses. The authors of the article emphasize the need to improve administrative laws in order to clarify grounds and rules for implementing the institution of relief from administrative responsibility. The authors also make suggestions regarding what should be changed in Articles 6.8 and 6.9 of The Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses. The methodological basis of the research implies dialectical method, fundamental research concepts, and philosophy that provides a general method of studying the reality. In the course of their research the authors have also applied such methods as historical, legal law, sociological, statistical analysis methods. The main conclusions of the research are the following. Firstly, to observe the principles of legality and expediency when appealing to Article 2.9 of The Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses, the authors suggest to make significant changes to the aforesaid article in order to clarify definitions and criteria to qualify an administrative offense as insignificant. Secondly, the authors prove the need to change Articles 6.8 and 6.9 of The Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses. 

Keywords: drug trafficking, seizure, measures to ensure, inspection of a vehicle, proceedings, insignificance of an administrative offense, administrative offense, administrative responsibility, exemption, police officer

DOI:

10.7256/2306-9945.2017.5.25469

Article was received:

16-02-2018


Review date:

16-02-2018


Publish date:

12-03-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 14.02.2013 4-P Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti Federal'nogo zakona "O vnesenii izmenenii v Kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh i Federal'nyi zakon "O sobraniyakh, mitingakh, demonst-ratsiyakh, shestviyakh i piketirovaniyakh" v svyazi s zaprosom gruppy deputatov Gosudarstvennoi Dumy i zhaloboi grazhdanina E.V. Savenko // Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF. 4. 2013.
2.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 19 dek. 2013 g. 40 O vnesenii izmenenii v postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 24 marta 2005 goda 5 O ne-kotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossii-skoi Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2014. 2.
3.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 20 dekabrya 2005 g. 26 O voprose, voznikshem posle prinyatiya Plenumom Verkhovnogo Suda RF 5 aprelya 2005 g. Postanovleniya 7 O vnesenii izmenenii i dopolnenii v Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 14 dekabrya 2000 g. 35 O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh pri rassmotrenii del, svyazannykh s realizatsiei invalidami prav, garantirovannykh Zakonom Rossiiskoi Federatsii O sotsial'noi zashchite grazhdan, podvergshikhsya vozdeistviyu radiatsii vsledstvie katastrofy na Chernobyl'skoi AES // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2006. 2.
4.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.10.2006 18 (red. ot 09.02.2012) O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Osobennoi chasti Kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob admini-strativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Rossiiskaya gazeta, 250. 08.11.2006.
5.
Besschasnyi S.A., Budlov I.M. Oprotestovanie prokurorom sudeb-nykh postanovlenii o prekrashchenii del ob administrativnykh pravonaru-sheniyakh v sfere protivodeistviya korruptsii po maloznachitel'nosti // Za-konnost'. 2014. 5. S. 7-10.
6.
Gumenyuk T.A. Maloznachitel'nost' administrativnogo pravonaru-sheniya kak osnovanie osvobozhdeniya ot administrativnoi otvetstvennosti // Vestnik VAS RF, 2006, 11.
7.
Dolgikh I.P. Byt' ili ne byt' institutu osvobozhdeniya ot admini-strativnoi otvetstvennosti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii? // Yuridicheskie is-sledovaniya. 2015. 1. S. 1-15.
8.
Lobanova L.V., Rozhnov A.P. Maloznachitel'nost' deyaniya: abstrakt-nost' zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya i trudnosti pravookhranitel'noi realizatsii // Zakonnost'. 2016. 6. S. 46-50.
9.
Mikailov S.M. K voprosu o roli administrativnoi deliktologii v deyatel'nosti politsii v svete realizatsii novoi Strategii natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2017. 5.
10.
Rossinskii B.V. Razmyshleniya o gosudarstvennom upravlenii i administrativnoi otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2016. 5. S. 6-24.
11.
Senyuk G.V. Maloznachitel'nost' i primenenie preduprezhdeniya: faktory i problemy // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess, 2017, 10.
12.
Suponina E.A., Dolgikh I.P. Institut osvobozhdeniya ot administ-rativnoi otvetstvennosti: teoreticheskie i zakonodatel'nye problemy // Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovatsii. 2016. 2 [Elektron-nyi resurs]. URL: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2016/02/63256
13.
Tekst ofitsial'nogo vystupleniya V.A. Kolokol'tseva na rasshi-rennom zasedanii kollegii MVD Rossii ot 09.03.2017 ( https://xn--b1aew.xn--p1ai/document/3172398).
14.
Trofimov V.N. Podborka sudebnykh reshenii za 2016 god: Stat'ya 2.9 Vozmozhnost' osvobozhdeniya ot administrativnoi otvetstvennosti pri maloznachitel'nosti administrativnogo pravonarusheniya KoAP RF.
15.
Shergin A.P. Administrativno-deliktnoe pravo i zakonodatel'-stvo (stat'i, vystupleniya, razmyshleniya). M.: VNII MVD Rossii, 2015. S. 43.