Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1858,   Articles in work: 312 Declined articles: 768 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Criminal legal characteristic of the object of involvement of minors in the commission of acts dangerous for the minor's life (Article 151.2 of the Criminal Code of Russian Federation)
Greben'kova Lidiya Aleksandrovna

Post-graduate student, the department of Criminal Law, South-West State University

305040, Russia, Kurskaya oblast', g. Kursk, ul. 50 Let Oktyabrya, 94, aud. 525

lidiagrebenkova@gmail.com

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the characteristics of the object of criminal involvement of a minor in the commission of acts dangerous for minor’s life. The author attempts to determine the key criminal relevant features of the aforementioned act that define its objective hazard to society, sufficient for acknowledging as socially dangerous, as well as the need for criminalization. Attention is also focused on the circumstances that significantly increase the typical social danger of the criminal act that can be included into the criminal legislation as a qualifying factor. Using the formal legal method alongside the literal interpretation of legal acts, the author conducts the detailed analysis of the content of the basic, additional, and facultative object of crime, the responsibility for which is established by the Article 151.2 of the Criminal Code of Russian Federation. The main conclusion lies in the fact that besides the main object that implies the interests of healthy development and upbringing of a minor, as well as the additional object (life of a minor), the considered act can cause harm to health, freedom, and sexual integrity of a minor alongside the interests of family upbringing and the established order of exercising pedagogical activity. The indicated circumstances must be taken into account through determination of the qualifying factors. Therewith, there is a need for protection of public morality from the public propaganda unlawful activity.

Keywords: propaganda of unlawful actions, unlawful behaviour, family, upbringing of minors, public morality, person, object of crime, social danger, aggravating factors, violence

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2018.2.25615

Article was received:

03-03-2018


Review date:

04-03-2018


Publish date:

13-03-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Agapov S. V. O neobkhodimosti pravovogo ponyatiya sem'i // Vestnik Rossiiskoi pravovoi akademii. 2011. № 4. S. 13-17.
2.
Belov V.F. Prestupleniya protiv sem'i i nesovershennoletnikh v aspektakh de lege lata i de lege ferenda. M.: Rusaki, 2002. S. 52-53. 80 s.
3.
Vertepova T. A. K voprosu ob ugolovno-pravovoi okhrane chelovecheskogo embriona // Obshchestvo i pravo. 2014. №4. S. 91-93.
4.
Vinokurov V. N. Ob''ekt prestupleniya: aspekty ponimaniya, sposoby ustanovleniya i primenenie ugolovnogo zakona: monografiya. M.: Yurlitinform, 2012. 286 s.
5.
Greben'kov A. A. Problemy protivodeistviya informatsionnym prestupleniyam, sovershaemym v khode deyatel'nosti massovykh setevykh soobshchestv // Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya i pravo. 2016. № 4. S. 62-67.
6.
Zhilyaeva A. A. Teoretiko-pravovye aspekty i genezis opredeleniya ponyatiya «sem'ya» v otechestvennom zakonodatel'stve i pravovoi nauke // Semeinoe i zhilishchnoe pravo. 2015. № 2. S. 20-23.
7.
Zatelepin O. K voprosu o ponyatii ob''ekta prestupleniya v ugolovnom prave // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2003. № 1. S. 29-31.
8.
Korzhanskii N. I. Ob''ekt prestupleniya // Entsiklopediya ugolovnogo prava. T. 4. Sostav prestupleniya / pod red. V. B. Malinina. SPb.: Izd-vo prof. Malinina, 2005. 798 s.
9.
Maleina M.N. Lichnye neimushchestvennye prava grazhdan: ponyatie, osushchestvlenie, zashchita. M.: MZ Press, 2000. 244 s.
10.
Mal'tsev V. V. Vidy neposredstvennogo individual'nogo ob''ekta prestupleniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2012. № 1. S. 58-64.
11.
Palii V. V. Ob''ekt prestuplenii protiv sem'i i nesovershennoletnikh: spornye voprosy // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. 2010. №3. S. 284-291.
12.
Pudovochkin Yu.E. Otvetstvennost' za prestupleniya protiv nesovershennoletnikh. SPb.: Yuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2002. 293 s.
13.
Romanovskii G. B. Nachalo zhizni cheloveka v ugolovnom prave // Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal. 2012. № 3. S. 43-49.
14.
Savel'eva V.S. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya struktury razdela VII Osobennoi chasti UK («Prestupleniya protiv lichnosti») // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: mat. mezhdunar. nauch.-praktich. konf. M., 2008. S. 306-312.
15.
Fesenko E. Ob''ekt prestupleniya s tochki zreniya tsennostnoi teorii // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2003. № 3. S. 71-73.
16.
Sharapov R. D. Al'ternativnye teorii ob''ekta prestupleniya v sovremennom ugolovnom prave Rossii // Lex Russica. 2015. № 12. S. 43-51
17.
Shershen' T. V. O prave na sem'yu i probleme opredeleniya ponyatiya sem'i v sovremennom rossiiskom prave // Semeinoe i zhilishchnoe pravo. 2010. № 6. S. 14-18.