Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1989,   Articles in work: 305 Declined articles: 758 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

To the question of correlation between legal and juridical responsibility
Kotkovskiy Leonid Eduardovich

External Doctoral Candidate, Scientific Associate, Sochi Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Docent,  the department of Theory and History of State and Law, Sevastopol State University

299053, Russia, g. Sevastopol', ul. Universitetskaya, 33

kotkovskiy-leonid@rambler.ru

Abstract.

The subject of this research is substantiated by the scientific views on legal and juridical responsibility presented in the Russian legal literature, which in most cases, does not demarcates these concepts and uses them as synonyms. The formulation of questions of legal liability is conducted in the context of consideration of the issues of juridical responsibility. The author analyzes the correlation between legal and juridical responsibility, reflecting the conceptual ideas of natural law and legal state; covers the theoretical reasoning on the problems of identification of the legal and juridical responsibility in connection with such phenomena as law, types of legal consciousness, social responsibility, positive and negative behavior; develops various models of legal and juridical responsibility, revealing their similarities and differences; determines the peculiarities, features, and spheres of practical implementation of the legal and juridical responsibility. The scientific novelty lies in proving the need for distinguishing legal responsibility from juridical. The following conclusions were made in the course of this research: legal responsibility is a structural elements of law as the social institution, for of social responsibility, doctrinal model that can be applies in academic pursuit and lawmaking process; juridical responsibility is a normative model that enshrined in the formal legal sources, has a discernible structure, and is an element of the professional, practical legal activities.

Keywords: legal understanding, object of law, subject of law, regulatory model, doctrinal model, responsibility, act, law, legal responsibility, social responsibility

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0668.2018.4.26071

Article was received:

19-04-2018


Review date:

20-04-2018


Publish date:

17-10-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Vetrova, G.N. Ugolovno-protsessual'naya otvetstvennost' / G.N. Vetrova.-M: Nauka, 1987.
2.
Polyakov, A.V. K ponyatiyu sub''ekta prava // Postklassicheskaya ontologiya prava: monografiya / pod red. I. L. Chestnova.-SPb.: Aleteiya, 2016. C. 561-684.
3.
Matuzov, N.I. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik / N.I. Matuzov, A.V. Mal'ko.-M.: Yurist'', 2004.
4.
Kudryavtsev, V.N. Pravo i povedenie / V.N. Kudryavtsev.-M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1978.
5.
Vitruk, N.V. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti / N.V. Vitruk.-M.: Norma, 2009.
6.
Vitruk, N.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie v Rossii (1991-2001 gg.): ocherki teorii i praktiki / N.V. Vitruk.-M.: Gorodets, 2001.
7.
Kudryavtsev, V.N. O pravoponimanii i zakonnosti // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo.-1994. 3. C. 3-8.
8.
Grafskii, V.G. O nepreodolennykh trudnostyakh v sozdanii integral'noi yurisprudentsii // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava.-2017. 7.-S. 19-24.
9.
Leist, O.E. Metodologicheskie problemy yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti: problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava / O.E. Leist.-M.: Prospekt, 1999.
10.
Nersesyants, V.S. Filosofiya prava: libertarno-yuridicheskaya kontseptsiya // Voprosy filosofii.-2002, 3.-C. 3-15.
11.
Chestnov, I.L. Problema sub''ekta prava v sovremennoi yuridicheskoi nauke // Yuridicheskaya mysl'.-2007. 41 (3). C. 90-94.
12.
Mal'tsev, G.V. Sotsialisticheskoe pravo i svoboda lichnosti: (Teoreticheskie voprosy) / G.V. Mal'tsev.-M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1968.
13.
Marchenko, M.N. Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Akademicheskii kurs: V 3 t., T. 2 / M.N. Marchenko.-M.: IKD Zertsalo-M, 2007.
14.
Lazarev, V.V. Integratsiya prava i implementatsiya integrativnykh podkhodov k pravu v reshenii suda // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava.-2017. 7.-S. 5-18.
15.
Polyakov A.V. Proshchanie s klassikoi, ili Kak vozmozhna kommunikativnaya teoriya prava // Rossiiskii ezhegodnik teorii prava, 2008. 1.-SPb.: OOO "Universitetskii izdatel'skii konsortsium "Yuridicheskaya kniga", 2009.-S. 9-42.
16.
Shafirov, V.M. Estestvennopozitivnoe pravo: Vvedenie v teoriyu: monografiya / V.M. Shafirov.-Krasnoyarsk: ITs KrasGU, 2004.
17.
Mamut, L.S. Pravovoe obshchenie: ocherk teorii.-M.: Norma, 2011.
18.
Sidorenko, A.I., Ibragimova, Yu.E. Integrativnoe ponimanie prava // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava.-2017. 7.-S. 33-45.
19.
Vlasenko, N.A. Pravoponimanie v svete kategorii opredelennosti i neopredelennosti // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava.-2014. 2.-S. 37-44.
20.
Glukhareva, L.I. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' kak pravovaya konstruktsiya // Vektor nauki TGU.-2010. 3(3).-S. 44-47.
21.
Noskov, S.A. O ponyatii instituta yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti // Pravo i politika.-2007. 3.-S. 13-19.
22.
Sidorenko, A.I., Ibragimova, Yu.E. Integrativnoe ponimanie prava // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava.-2017. 7.-S.33-45;
23.
Martyshin, O.V. Sovmestimy li osnovnye tipy ponimaniya prava? // Gosudarstvo i pravo.-2003. 6.-S. 13-21.
24.
Sammers R.S. Gospodstvuyushchaya pravovaya teoriya v SShA // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo.-1989. 7.-S. 109-116.
25.
Lazarev, V.V. Poisk prava // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava.-2004. 7.-S. 3-14.
26.
Besedina, V. Funktsii prava kak sotsial'nogo instituta // Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba.-2005. 4 (36).-S. 85-89.
27.
Marchenko, M.N. Problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava: ucheb / M.N. Marchenko.-M.: Prospekt, 2009.
28.
Alekseev, S.S. Voskhozhdenie k pravu. Poiski i resheniya / S.S. Alekseev.-M.: Izdatel'stvo NORMA, 2001.