Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1920,   Articles in work: 290 Declined articles: 813 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Models of social integration of the example of Anastasian ecovillages “Slavnoye” and “Kovcheg”
Demidova Yuliya

Post-graduate student, the department of Ethnology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

119192, Russia, Non-Us/non-Canadian oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Lomonosovskiy Prospect, 27, k.4

decostiera@gmail.com

Abstract.

The focus of this research is the uniting motives and their implementation in the aforementioned communities. The work is based on the hypothesis about the existence of the established collectivism in Anastasian communities. On one hand, it was formed by the common ideological field of Anastasianism, while on the other – the problem of spatial social remoteness of the material and social resources of a city, which served as motivation for integration of the former residents as the ideological congregations. The process of “unification” leans on the demarcation of common interests and practices of the collective mutualism. The key method is the in-depth interview. The author also applied the method on nonrandom sample, snowball sampling – the selection of respondents in accordance with the references of local residents. The material presents interest due to the abundance of field observation in fairly close communities of present time, as well as provides an idea about the actual relationship between its members. Ecovillages “Slavnoye” and “Kovcheg”, in essence, are the communities of collective type, uniting people with various religious preferences. Many of them are the adherers of the New Age movement, while others self-identify themselves outside the ideological context. They see their belonging in sharing the universal human values: neighborliness, ban of abusive language and alcohol, property insurance, healthy eating, obtainment of personal freedom from the imposed city stereotypes. In general, the integrative models are based on the practical mutual help of the community members, financial self-sufficiency (carrying out of holiday events, festivals, joint labor artels), as well as religious and leisure practices. However, even within the ideological commonwealth, exists and opinion about the lack of societality despite the common behavioral norms, as well as sharing of responsibilities and single cultural orientation.

Keywords: leisure activities, over-ethnicity, ideologic community, cohesion, social solitude, rural homesteading, collectivism, ecovillage, cultural reconstruction, community

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7144.2018.5.26087

Article was received:

21-04-2018


Review date:

25-04-2018


Publish date:

11-05-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Analiticheskii obzor ekologicheskikh poselenii Rossii. M.: Tsirkon, 2012. (http://www.zircon.ru/upload/iblock/e76/Jekoposelenija_v_Rossii_Analiticheskij_obzor.pdf) [data obrashcheniya: 01.04.2018]
2.
Andreeva Yu.O. Voprosy vlasti i samoupravleniya v religioznom dvizhenii «Anastasiya»: ideal'nye obrazy rodovykh poselenii i «voploshchenie mechty» // Antropologicheskii forum on-line. 2012. №17. (http://anthropologie.kunstkamera.ru/files/pdf/017online/andreeva_links.pdf) [data obrashcheniya: 01.04.2018]
3.
Andreeva Yu.O. Proekty preobrazovaniya mira v novom religioznom dvizhenii «Anastasiya»: antropologicheskie aspekty religii N'yu-Eidzh v sovremennoi Rossii. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie nauchnoi stepeni kandidata istoricheskikh nauk. SPb., 2017. 272 c.
4.
Pol'skii I. Dvizhenie «Anastasiya/Zvenyashchie kedry»: istoriya formirovaniya, vidy mirovozzreniya, sotsial'nye praktiki. M.: RGGU, 2010. http://nauchkor.ru/pubs/dvizhenie-anastasiya-zvenyaschie-kedry-istoriya-formirovaniya-vidy-mirovozzreniya-sotsialnye-praktiki-56bb226f5f1be70dac00059e [data obrashcheniya: 21.04.2018]
5.
Praktiki splochennosti v sovremennoi Rossii. Sotsiokul'turnyi analiz // Pod red. Pokrovskogo N.E, Kozlovoi M.A. M. 2016. S.66 – 79.
6.
Predislovie D. Ol'khovogo. // Kristian Dayana. Tvorim sovmestnuyu zhizn' ili kak sozdat' ekoposlenie ili obshchinu vashei mechty. (http://www.dragondreaming.org/ru/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2016/04/Diana_Leaf_Kristian_Tvorim_sovmestnuyu_zhizn.pdf) [data obrashcheniya: 01.04.2018]
7.
Kulyasov I.A., Kulyasova A.A., Tysyachnyuk M.S. Al'ternativnye praktiki pitaniya v ob''edineniyakh ekologicheskoi etiki // Ekologicheskoe dvizhenie v Rossii. Pod nauch. red. Zdravomyslovoi E., Tysyachnyuk M.-SPb: TsNS.1999.Vyp. 6. C. 87-100.
8.
Ozhiganova A. Novaya religioznost' v sovremennoi Rossii: ucheniya, formy, praktiki. M.: IEA RAN, 2006. 300 c.
9.
Shnirel'man V.A. Mesta sily: konstruirovanie sakral'nogo prostranstva // Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 2014. № 5. C. 3-10.
10.
Shnirel'man V.A. Russkoe rodnoverie. Neoyazychestvo i natsionalizm v sovremennoi Rossii. M., 2012. 302 c.