Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1862,   Articles in work: 317 Declined articles: 766 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Ideology of Seymour Martin Lipsets end of ideology
Lukarevskaia Elizaveta

Post-graduate student, the department of Philosophy of Politics and Law, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

119234, Russia, Moscow, Lomonosovskiy Prospekt 27, building #4

liza777_77@mail.ru

 

 

Abstract.

The object of this research is the theories of deideologization and reideologization. The subject is S. M. Lipset’s concept of the “end of ideology”. The author analyzes the evolution of this concept on the example of the book by S.M. Lipset “Political man: the social bases of politics”, as well as considers the works of other representatives of deideologization theory. Special attention is given to the nature of the indicated concept and its origins, analyzing the factors of decline of the total ideologies, as well as the features of American society, which according to the opinion of deideologization theoreticians are natural for the open democratic society. The theoretical importance of this work is defined by the analysis of S. M. Lipset’s concept of the “end of ideology” as a product of the expert-ideological community. Examination of the specificity of works of the deideologization representatives encourages the more profound comprehension of the methods and key motives of foreign policy of the United States and European countries at the present time. One of the drawn conclusions implies that the deideologization theory was aimed at the criticism of value orientations of total ideologies.

Keywords: reideologization, total ideology, The end of ideology, USA, deideologization, Seymour Martin Lipset, American culture, political man, democracy, Edward Shils

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0684.2018.5.26189

Article was received:

04-05-2018


Review date:

04-05-2018


Publish date:

07-05-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Aristotel'. Sochineniya: V 4 t. T. 4.-M.: Mysl', 1983. S. 376-644. Str 488.
2.
Veber M.. Nauka kak prizvanie i professiya // M.Veber. Izbrannoe: Protestantskaya etika i dukh kapitalizma. M.; SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ; Universitetskaya kniga, 2014.
3.
Voitolovskii F.G. Edinstvo i razobshchennost' Zapada: ideologich. otrazhenie v soznanii elit SShA i Zapada. Evropy transformatsii politich. miroporyadka 19402000-e gg. M.: Kraft+, 2007. 464 s.
4.
Voitolovskii F.G. Proizvodstvo intellektual'nogo prostranstva mirovoi politiki. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2006. T. 4. 2 (11).
5.
Kalinichev N.N. Deideologizatsiya kak politicheskii mif // Sotsial'naya filosofiya v kontse XX veka. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1991, 200 s.
6.
Lipset C.M. Politicheskii chelovek: sotsial'nye osnovaniya politiki. Moskva: Mysl', 2016. 612 s.
7.
Moskvichev L.N. Teoriya deideologizatsii: illyuzii i deistvitel'nost' (Kriticheskii ocherk ob odnoi modnoi burzhuaznoi kontseptsii). M., Mysl', 1971. 238 s.
8.
Rossiya segodnya. Politicheskii portret, 1985 1990 gg. M.: Mezhdunar. Otnosheniya, 1991. 512. s.
9.
Lipset S.M., Marks G. It Didnt Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States. New York and London: W. W. Norton, 2000. 379.
10.
Marks G. Seymour Martin Lipset. Scholar of democracy driven to understand American society. The Guardian. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2007/jan/12/guardianobituaries.usa (data obrashcheniya: 10.04.2018).
11.
Shils E. The End of ideology? Encounter, 5 (November 1955), p. 52 58.