Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1990,   Articles in work: 326 Declined articles: 783 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Representation, Exemplification, Vestigium: the Problem of Presence in Image Studies
Sharopova Nigina Rustamovna

Post-Graduate Student of the School of Philosophy at National Research University 'Higher School of Economics', Senior Researcher at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

109451, Russia, g. Moscow, bul. Perervinskii, 8, kv. 232

naighy92@gmail.com

Abstract.

The article is devoted to the problem of reference in image studies. The relationship between images and their reflection is one of the key problems in this field of research, especially because, as the author of the research notes, one of the possible views on the genealogy of image directly relates to such phenomenon as estrangement. Referring to Hans Belting's researches, the author of the article notes that the origin of an image itself is related to the phenomenon of estrangement of the image from its reflection and fixation of an image in another material medium, on the one hand, and preservation of that relationship with its reflection, on the other hand. To clarify these complex relations, the author applies three concepts, representation, exemplification and vestigium (trace). The first concept is used according to the definition offered by a modern researcher G. Bohm and Hans-Georg Gadamer in his 'Truth and Method'. According to their interpretation, representation is understood as intensification and extension of a referent's presence. Then, the author refers to the term 'exemplification' as it was first introduced by Henry Nelson Goodman as a new type of a sign. Having demonstrated, that none of these strategies fully explains the phenomenon of estrangement, the author refers to the third concept of vestigium (trace) of St. Augustine. Unlike the first two concepts, vestigium is described as the process of the denial from an image's own features which cannot be said about a sign and thus cannot be estranged from the presence it is conveyed through. However, this concept offered by Augustine has not been of great interest for researchers so far. It does not have a translation in Russian and has never been used in image studies. This is what makes the novelty of the present research. 
 


Gottfried Böhm


Gottfried Böhm in 2015


Born
January 23, 1920 (age 98)Offenbach, Hessen

Occupation
Architect

Awards
Pritzker Prize


 

Buildings
Neviges Pilgrimage Church, VelbertBensberg City Hall






 
Böhm's 1968 Iglesia Youth Center Library, Cologne.





 
Böhm's pilgrimage church, Velbert(then Neviges).


Gottfried Böhm

Keywords: Hans-Georg Gadamer, mimesis, image studies, vestigium, reference, representation, sign, image, St. Augustine, Henry Nelson Goodman

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0625.2018.5.26232

Article was received:

08-05-2018


Review date:

08-05-2018


Publish date:

01-06-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Blazhennyi Avgustin. O svobode voli. // Antologiya srednevekovoi mysli: v 2 t. T. 1. SPb.: RKhGI, 2001. S. 2566.
2.
Blazhennyi Avgustin. Ob istinnoi religii // Blazhennyi Avgustin. Tvoreniya: V 4 t. T. 1: Ob istinnoi religii. SPb.: Aleteiya; Kiev: UTsIMM Press, 2000. S. 394468.
3.
Blazhennyi Avgustin. Khristianskaya nauka ili osnovaniya svyashchennoi germenevtiki i tserkovnogo krasnorechiya. Ripol Klassik, 2013. 370 S.
4.
Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod: osnovy filosofskoi germenevtiki. M: Progress, 1988.
5.
Gudmen N. Sposoby sozdaniya mirov. M.: Praksis, 2001. S. 376
6.
Zhiro V. Signum i vestigium u blazhennogo Avgustina. // Metaparadigma: bogoslovie, filosofiya, estestvoznanie: al'manakh. SPb.NP-Print: 2015. S. 90-105
7.
Krauss R. Zametki ob indekse // Krauss R. Podlinnost' avangarda i drugie modernistskie mify. M.: Khudozhestvennyi Zhurnal, 2003. S. 201224.
8.
Pirs Ch. S. Printsipy filosofii. Tom II. SPb.: 2001.S. 320
9.
Mar'on Zh.L. Perekrest'ya vidimogo i nevidimogo. // Perekrest'ya vidimogo. M.: ProgressTraditsiya, 2010. S. 1152.
10.
Belting H. (2012) Body and Image In: Alexander J.C., Bartmanski D. and Giesen B. (eds.) Iconic Power: Materiality and Meaning in Social Life. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 187-202
11.
Belting H. (2011) An Anthropology of Images: Picture, Medium, Body. Princeton University Press.
12.
Boehm G. (2012) Representation, Presentation, Presence: Tracing the Homo Pictor. In: Alexander J.C., Bartmanski D. and Giesen B. (eds.) Iconic Power: Materiality and Meaning in Social Life. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1524.
13.
Nancy J.-L. (2005) The Ground of Image. New York: Fordham University Press.
14.
Neyrat F. (2002) Limage Hors-Limage. Paris:LHarmattan.
15.
Seel M. (2005) Aesthetics of Appearing. Stanford University Press.