Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1891,   Articles in work: 301 Declined articles: 800 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Modern Theoretical Questions of Historical Sciences
Khvostova Kseniya Vladimirovna

Doctor of History

Senior Research Associate, Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences

119334, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Leninskii Prospekt, 32a, of. Institut vseobshchei istorii RAN

xeniakhvostova@yandex.ru

Abstract.

This article examines the specific features of historical sciences as a topic concerning the interrelation of logical knowledge and intuitive knowledge. The author analyzes various types of convergences of historical and natural science knowledge within the framework of synergetics. The article sets the goal to demonstrate the limits of the applicability of synergetics in historical research. The historical methods applied to this examination include the study of hermeneutics, the reconstruction of motivational, semantic, axiological and aim-orienting factors of self-realization of the person of the past. The author notes the role of Postmodernism in the substantiation of the historical sciences. The author refers to her own personal research practice and illustrates the features of historical transdisciplinarity with examples from Byzantine history. The author focuses her attention to the specific features of historical sciences linked to the role of the narrative and historical events. Additionally, the author considers the limited role in historiography of modern scientific Constructivism. The author furthermore studies the difference between the role of induction in historical and natural sciences. Contrary to the well-known fact that induction in natural sciences does not lead to general conclusions, the author tries to show the significance of induction in historical studies, limited chronotopes of the past. The author examines the differences between the concepts of a long and short historical time and considers the concept of "kairos" used in the framework of ancient and Byzantine cultures. Finally, the author gives a characterization of the role of the concept of "kairos" in modern scientific practices. In the conclusion of the article, the author tries to determine the place of historical sciences in the system of modern scientific knowledge.

Keywords: short historical time, kairos, long historical time, constructivism, historical narrative, transdisciplinarity, synergetic, induction, postmodernism, intuitive knowledge

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0609.2018.3.26234

Article was received:

09-05-2018


Review date:

11-05-2018


Publish date:

06-06-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Prigozhin I. Filosofiya nestabil'nosti // Voprosy filosofii. 1991. 6. S. 4052.
2.
Prigozhin I. Pereotkrytie vremeni // Voprosy filosofii. 1989. 8. S. 319.
3.
Maintser K. Vyzovy slozhnosti v XKhI veke. Mezhdistsiplinarnoe vvedenie // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. 10. S. 8498.
4.
Khaidegger M. Ocherki filosofii. O sobytii // Voprosy filosofii. 2006. 11. S. 164166.
5.
Realisticheskii povorot v sovremennoi epistemologii, filosofii soznaniya i nauke: kruglyi stol // Voprosy filosofii. 2017. 1. S. 539.
6.
Khaidegger M. Bytie i vremya. M.: Nauka, 2002. 451s.
7.
Riker P. Istoriya i istina. SPb.: Aleteiya, 2002. 399s.
8.
Petrenko V. F. Konstruktivizm kak novaya paradigma v naukakh o cheloveke // Voprosy filosofii. 2011. 6. S. 7581.
9.
Miller D. Mashinnoe ugadyvanie // Voprosy filosofii. 2012. 7. S. 110119.
10.
Przhilenskii V. I. Ideya real'nosti i epistemologiya konstruktivizma // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. 11. S. 105113.
11.
Khvostova K. V. Osobennosti istiny i ob''ektivnosti v istoricheskom znanii // Voprosy filosofii. 2017. 7. S. 2737.
12.
Khvostova K. V. Vizantiiskaya tsivilizatsiya kak istoricheskaya paradigma. SPb.: Aleteiya, 2008. 207 s.
13.
Rozin V. M. Obsuzhdenie fenomena transdistsiplinarnosti sobytie novoi nauchnoi revolyutsii // Voprosy filosofii. 2016. 5. S. 106116.
14.
Actes de Lavra / Ed. par A. Guillou, P. Lemerle, D. Papachrissanthou, N. Svoronos. Vol. III. Paris: Lethielleux, 1979. 230 p.
15.
Corpus juris civilis. Vol. I. Digesta / Ed. par Th. Mommsen, P. Krüger. Berolini: Weidmann, 1954. 560 p.
16.
Basilicorum libri LX / Ed. par H. Y. Shseltema, N. van der Wal, J. B. Wolters. Groningen: Djakarta Martinus Nijhoff; Gravenhage. 1955. 608p.
17.
Khvostova K. V. Sovremennyi istoricheskii narrativ // Voprosy filosofii. 2018. 2. S. 615.
18.
Kollingvud Dzh. R. Ideya istorii. Avtobiografiya. M.: Nauka, 1980. 485 s.
19.
Actes de Decheiariou / Ed. par N. Oikonomidès. Paris: Lethilleux, 1984. 213 p.
20.
Correspondance de Nicéphore Grégoras / Ed. et trad. par R. Guilland. Paris: Société dédition Les Belles lettres, 1927. 391 p.
21.
Gegel' G. V. F. Filosofiya istorii. SPb.: Nauka, 1993. 479 s.
22.
Aggatsi E. Epistemologiya i sotsial'noe: petlya obratnoi svyazi // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. 7. S. 5769.
23.
Mutsopulos E. Aristotel' o moral'nykh i ekonomicheskikh krizisakh // Voprosy filosofii. 2016. 5. S. 128137.
24.
Kessidi F. Kh. Byla li u drevnikh grekov istoriya? // Voprosy filosofii. 1987. 8. S. 126133.