Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1924,   Articles in work: 305 Declined articles: 811 
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Use of the data of global monitoring for development of substantiated scientific-innovation policy: results of a pilot study
Popova Svetlana Mikhailovna

PhD in Politics

leading researcher at Institute of Socio-Political Research under the Russian Academy of Sciences

119333, Russia, gorod federal'nogo znacheniya Moskva, g. Moscow, ul. Fotievoi, 6, of. 1
Другие публикации этого автора

Yanik Andrey Aleksandrovich

PhD in Technical Science

leading researcher at Institute of Socio-Political Research under the Russian Academy of Sciences

119333, Russia, Moscow, Fotieva's str., 6, of. 1
Другие публикации этого автора



This article provides the results of a pilot study of the specificities of science and innovations management systems in a number of European countries (Netherlands, Germany, and the United Kingdom), taking into account the data from global monitoring of the socioeconomic and scientific-innovation development. The goal of this research is to find approaches that would enable development of national scientific-innovative “ecosystems” in all their multi-dimensionality and complexity, and subsequently, discovery of interconnection between the factors and processes, which are managed within the framework of separate strategies with unique systems of monitoring and assessment of performance. Using the specific examples alongside relevant data from the various global monitoring (2007-2017), the authors demonstrate that the expansion of the context of study of the phenomena at hand contributes to determination of the factors, crucial for the development of evidence-based recommendations on improving the techniques and methods of government administration in the area of science and innovations.

Keywords: Entrepreneurship, Research and Development, Evidence-based Policy, United Kingdom, Germany, Netherlands, Innovation, Science Policy, Global Competitiveness Index, Global Innovation Index



Article was received:


Review date:


Publish date:


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

New economic growth: the role of science, technology, innovation and infrastructure. G7 Academies’ Joint Statements 2017. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2018).
Stiglitz J.E., Greenwald B.C. Creating a Learning Society. A New Approach to Growth, Development, and Social Progress. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014 – 680 pp.
Mengoli P., Russo M. Innovation in education and re-industrialisation in Europe. DEMB Working Paper Series. No 35. 2014.
Yanik A.A., Popova S.M. Novaya paradigma upravleniya naukoi: opyt Niderlandov // Uchenyi Sovet. 2017. № 8. S. 19-29.
Yanik A.A., Popova S.M. Usilenie dirizhizma v upravlenii naukoi, innovatsiyami i vysshim obrazovaniem v Soedinennom Korolevstve posle «Breksita» // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2017. № 4. S. 118-130.
Yanik A.A., Popova S.M. Osnovnye osobennosti sovremennoi nauchnoi politiki v Germanii // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2016. № 2. S. 25-51.
New Skills Agenda for Europe, 2016. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2018).
Europe's next leaders: the Start-up and Scale-up Initiative. Strasbourg, 22.11.2016. COM (2016) 733 final.
European Investment Fund. Pan-European Venture Capital Fund(s)-of-Funds programme. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2018).
First Round of Consultation on the EC-OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Survey 2017. Working paper DSTI/STP (2017)12. Paris: OECD Headquarters, 2017. – 31 p.
European Commission, Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World: A Vision for Europe. Brussels: European Commission, 2016. – 102 p.
Research and innovation as sources of renewed growth // Brussels, 10.6.2014. COM (2014) 339 final.
Trobbiani R. Strengthening the Relationship between Science and Trade Policy in the European Union // Science & Diplomacy. 2017. December 18.
OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2017. The digital transformation. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017. – 220 p.
Science and Engineering Indicators 2018. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation, 2018. – 1060 p.
May T. Machinery of Government Changes: Written statement. HCWS94. July 18. 2016. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2018).
Clark B.R. The Higher Education System. Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983. 315 p.
Wet op de Nederlandse organisatie voor wetenschappelijk onderzoek 7 juli 1987 (t/m 31-10-2015). URL: (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2018).
Gibney E. United Kingdom relies on science to revive flagging economy // Nature. 2017. November 27.
Higher Education and Research Act 2017. 27th April 2017. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2018)
PM announces plans to secure UK’s long-term commitment to research & innovation and first steps in ambitious. Dept. for BEIS. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2018).
Building Our Industrial Strategy. Green Paper. HM Government, January 2017. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2018).
Owen R., Macnaghten Ph., Stilgoe J. Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society // Science and Public Policy. 2012. Vol. 39. № 6. P. 751–760.
Pieczka M., Escobar O. Dialogue and science: Innovation in policy-making and the discourse of public engagement in the UK // Science and Public Policy. 2013. Vol. 40. № 1. P. 113–126.
Arnaldi S., Quaglio G.-L., Ladikas M., O'Kane H., Karapiperis T., Srinivas K.R., Zhao Y. Responsible governance in science and technology policy: Reflections from Europe, China and India // Technology in Society. 2015. Vol. 42. P. 81–92.
Treanor B. Slow University: A Manifesto. 2008. URL: http:// (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2018).
Slow Science Academy. The Slow Science Manifesto. 2010. URL: http:// (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2018).
MacCabe D. The Slow Science Movement // University Affaires. 5 Dec. 2012. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2018).
O’Neill M. The slow university: Work, time and wellbeing // Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2014. Vol. 15. No. 3. Art. 14. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2018)
Berg M., Seeber B. Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy. Toronto: University Toronto Press, 2016. – 115 p.
Abramov R.N., Gruzdev I.A., Terent'ev E.A. Akademicheskaya professiya i ideologiya «medlennoi nauki» // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2016. № 10. S. 62-70.
Yanik A.A., Popova S.M. Novye trendy v gosudarstvennom upravlenii razvitiem nauki vo Frantsii // Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik (Elektronnyi zhurnal). 2015. № 51. S. 152-184.
Schiermeier Q. German scientists hope for windfall from incoming government // Nature. 2018. January 23.
Europe 2020 indicators - R&D and innovation. Eurostat Statistics Explained. April 2018. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2018).
Mercelis J., Gabriel Galvez-Behar G., Guagnini A. Commercializing science: nineteenth- and twentieth-century academic scientists as consultants, patentees, and entrepreneurs // History and Technology. 2017. Vol. 33. No 1. P. 4-22.
Berman E.P. Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012. – 280 p.
The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship / Eds. A. Basu, M. Casson, N. Wadeson, B. Yeung. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. – 808 p.
Handbook of Research on Internationalization of Entrepreneurial Innovation in the Global Economy / Ed. L.C. Carvalho. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2015. – 547 p.
Small, Medium, Strong. Trends in SME Performance and Business Condition. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017. – 118 p.
Towards Data Integration for Research Funding and Performing Organisations: a Science Europe Initiative. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2018).
European Innovation Scoreboard. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2018).
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. URL: (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2018).
The Global Competitiveness Report 2008–2009 / K. Schwab, M.E. Porter. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2008. – 499 p.