Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1980,   Articles in work: 306 Declined articles: 761 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Choosing Administrative Legal Proceedings for the Protection of Rights: Judicial Practice
Ivanova Inga Alekseevna

Post-graduate student, the department of Administrative Law and Administrative Procedure, North-West Institute of Management branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation

199034, Russia, g. Cankt-Peterburg, liniya 7-Ya v.o., 16-18

ingaalekseyevna@mail.ru

 

 

Abstract.

The subject of the research is the nettlesome issues and questions that relate to a particular legal proceeding based on the selected means of protection of applicant's rights. Ivanova analyzes the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Code of the Russian Federation on the rejection of an administrative application as a result of the wrong selection of the legal proceeding kind. She also outlines the debatable issues in the current judicial practice and defines the matter of debate between parties. The subject of the research is the forthcoming changes in the legislation. The  methodological basis of the research includes basic procedures including analysis and synthesis, analogies, logical, comparative law analysis, etc. Based on the analysis of judicial cases te author comes to the following conclusions: 1. The definition given in Subclase 1 of Clause 1 of Article 128 of the Administrative Procedure Code of the Russian Federation needs to be changed, in particular, to be narrowed, as the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation suggests in its draft law; 2. Despite the fact that the Administrative Procedure Code of the Russian Federation came into effect on September 15, 2015, applicants and sometimes courts still face confusion in administrative legal proceedings when they try to define whether this or that claim should be submitted as administrative offence; 3. Taking into account all the mentioned above, there is a certain abuse of the law from the side of administrative applicants which is demonstrated by the second example. 

Keywords: position, jurisdiction, administrative relations, code of administrative proceedings, defendant, administrative applicant, administrative proceedings, administrative statement of claim, judicial practice, judicial protection

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7136.2018.6.26430

Article was received:

28-05-2018


Review date:

30-05-2018


Publish date:

04-07-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Arbitrazhnyi protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii // SZ RF.- 30.-St. 3012.
2.
Vikut M.A. O yuridicheskoi terminologii v grazhdanskom protsessual'nom prave // Aktual'nye problemy grazhdanskogo prava i protsessa: Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Vyp. 1. Otv. red. D.Kh. Valeev, M.Yu. Chelyshev. M. 2006. S. 267.
3.
Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (chast' pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 51-FZ // SZ RF.- 32.-St. 3301.
4.
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 18.04.2018 14-KG18-1 // Ofitsial'nyi internet-portal pravovoi informatsii URL: http://pravo.gov.ru (data obrashcheniya 27 maya 2018).
5.
Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 08 marta 2015 g. 21-FZ // SZ RF.-2015.- 10.-St. 1391.
6.
Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva: ozhidaniya i perspektivy / V. Yarkov i dr. // Zakon.-2015.- 49.
7.
Konstitutsiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii // SZ RF.- 31.-St. 4398.
8.
Obzor sudebnoi praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii 2 (2017) (utv. Prezidiumom Verkhovnogo Suda RF 26.04.2017) // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF/-2018.-5.
9.
Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 27.03.2018 617-O Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdan Guseva Vladimira L'vovicha i Kiseleva Andreya Aleksandrovicha na narushenie ikh konstitutsionnykh prav stat'yami 1, 124 i 128 Kodeksa administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiiskoi Federatsii, a takzhe stat'yami 6 i 11 Federal'nogo konstitutsionnogo zakona "O prinyatii v Rossiiskuyu Federatsiyu Respubliki Krym i obrazovanii v sostave Rossiiskoi Federatsii novykh sub''ektov-Respubliki Krym i goroda federal'nogo znacheniya Sevastopolya". // Ofitsial'nyi internet-portal pravovoi informatsii URL: http://pravo.gov.ru (data obrashcheniya 27 maya 2018).
10.
Pankova O.V. O nekotorykh teoreticheskikh problemakh administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v RF // Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy administrativnogo pravosudiya: Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. 8-9 dekabrya 2005 goda, Moskva. M.: Mezhdunarodnaya akademiya otsenki i konsaltinga. 2006. S. 166.
11.
Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 27 sentyabrya 2016 g. 36 O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya sudami Kodeksa administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF.-2016.- 11.
12.
Proekt Federal'nogo zakona 383208-7 O vnesenii izmenenii v Grazhdanskii protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii, Arbitrazhnyi protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii, Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossiiskoi Federatsii i otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii // URL: http://sozd.parlament.gov.ru/ (data obrashcheniya 27.05.2018).