Ðóñ Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1938,   Articles in work: 312 Declined articles: 753 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Problem of implementation of the principle of “equality of arms” in the Russian civil procedure
Ilyasov Anvar Aidarovich

Post-graduate student, the department of Civil Law and Procedure, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation  

117218, Russia, gorod federal'nogo znacheniya Moskva, g. Moscow, ul. Bol'shaya Cheremushkinskaya, 34

anvar.ilyasov@gmail.com

Abstract.

This article discusses the topic of ensuring the European standards in delivering justice in the Russian civil procedure due to proclamation in practice of the European Court of Human Rights of the requirement of the “equality of arms” of procedural opponents that are an intrinsic element of the fair trial. The indicated problematic gains special relevant for the post-Soviet Russia in light of the attempts made by a legislator over the two recent decades aimed at enhancing competitiveness of the framework in the civil and arbitration proceedings. The author analyzes the rules on disclosure of evidence (Chapters 3 and 4 of the Article 65 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation) and “implied recognition” (Chapter 3.1 of the Article 70 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation). A conclusion is made that the specified institutions demonstrate the unsuccessful attempt of a legislator on strengthening the private-legal fundamentals in arbitration procedure in the spirit of European standards of delivering justice. The scientific novelty lies in the assessment of the fundamental procedural institutions through the prism of the international legal standards.

Keywords: legal equality, adversarial system, European standards, standard of law, implied recognition, discovery of evidence, arbitral proceeding, principle, evidence, foreign practices

DOI:

10.25136/2306-9899.2018.2.26498

Article was received:

03-06-2018


Review date:

06-06-2018


Publish date:

02-08-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod // Byulleten' mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov, ¹ 3, 2001.-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus». Ssylka
2.
Glazkova M.E. Primenenie evropeiskikh standartov otpravleniya pravosudiya v rossiiskom arbitrazhnom protsesse: monografiya. M.: Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve RF, Ankil, 2012. 200 s.-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus». Ssylka
3.
Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 18.10.2007 «Delo «Stadukhin (Stadukhin) protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloba ¹ 6857/02).-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus». Ssylka
4.
Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 30.05.2013 «Delo «OOO «Vesti» i Ukhov (OOO «Vesti» and Ukhov) protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloba ¹ 21724/03).-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus». Ssylka
5.
Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 02.10.2012 ¹ 27359/05 «Delo «Bortkevich (Bortkevich) protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloba ¹ 27359/05).-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus». Ssylka
6.
Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 25.07.2013 «Delo «Khodorkovskii i Lebedev (Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev) protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloby ¹ 11082/06 i 13772/05).-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus». Ssylka
7.
Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 03.05.2012 «Delo «Salikhov (Salikhov) protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloba ¹ 23880/05).-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus». Ssylka
8.
Problemy razvitiya protsessual'nogo prava Rossii: monografiya / A.V. Belyakova, L.A. Voskobitova, A.V. Gabov i dr.; pod red. V.M. Zhuikova. M.: Norma, Infra-M, 2016. 224 s.-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus» Ssylka
9.
Ukaz. soch. Glazkova M.E. Ssylka
10.
Lim A.A. Nekotorye problemy instituta raskrytiya dokazatel'stv v arbitrazhnom protsesse // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava.-2007.-¹8 .-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus». Ssylka
11.
Tak, v Pravilakh grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva (Civil Procedure Rules) opredeleny vidy raskrytiya dokazatel'stv (standartnoe i spetsial'noe) i ego etapy; kriterii, pomoshch'yu kotorogo opredelyaetsya krug dokumentov, podlezhashchikh raskrytiyu; privilegii v otnoshenii svedenii, kotorye pozvolyayut ne raskryvat' informatsiyu i t.d. Ssylka
12.
Arbitrazhnyi protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 24.07.2002 ¹ 95-FZ// «Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF», 29.07.2002, ¹ 30, st. 3012.-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus». Ssylka
13.
Informatsionnoe pis'mo Prezidiuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 13.08.2004 ¹ 82 «O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya Arbitrazhnogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii» //-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus». Ssylka
14.
«Vyvody sudebnogo yurista-2. Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie v arbitrazhnom protsesse: analiz pravoprimenitel'noi praktiki»/ pod red. Yuzefovicha V.B., 2013// Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus» Ssylka
15.
Tam zhe. Yuzefovich V.B. Ssylka
16.
V Kontseptsii edinogo Grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo kodeksa RF, odobrennaya resheniem Komiteta po grazhdanskomu, ugolovnomu, arbitrazhnomu i protsessual'nomu zakonodatel'stvu Gosudarstvennoi Dumy ot 8 dekabrya 2014 g. ¹ 124(1) predlagaetsya primenit' pravilo o molchalivom priznanii v grazhdanskom protsesse. Ssylka
17.
Molchanov V.V. Sudebnoe dokazyvanie v budushchem edinom Grazhdanskom protsessual'nom kodekse Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess. 2015. ¹ 3. S. 35-41.-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus». Ssylka
18.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Omskoi oblasti ot 24.05.2012 po delu ¹ A46-12382/2012.-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus». Ssylka
19.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 15.10.2013 ¹ 8127/13 po delu ¹ A46-12382/2012.-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus». Ssylka
20.
Reshenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Omskoi oblasti ot 18.03.2014 po delu ¹ A46-12382/2012.-Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoi sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».