Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2004,   Articles in work: 336 Declined articles: 786 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

The stages of US policy in Central Asia region (1991-2015)
Beishenaliev Almazbek Beishenalievich

PhD in Pedagogy

Docent, Regional Institute of Central Asia

720010, Kirgiziya, g. Bishkek, ul. Turusbekova, 109/1

lmzbeishenaliev@gmail.com

 

 

Abstract.

This article demonstrates the key stages of the advancement of US policy in Central Asia region, which includes five countries: Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. The United States were among the first to recognize these countries as the full-fledged actors of international relations. The author determines the three stages in development of the relations between the United States and the countries of Central Asia. The first stage marks the acquisition of sovereignty after dissolution of the Soviet Union in the late XX century; the second falls on the presidency of George W. Bush (2001-2009) and ended in 2014; the third began in 2015. The article presents the texts of bilateral agreements between the United States and five republics of Central Asia; a total of over 60 agreements, the majority of which have been signed by Kazakhstan due to the problem of annihilation of nuclear armaments on its territory. Over the recent time, in US policy with regards to Kyrgyzstan have occurred certain issues and misunderstandings, which forces to search for new vectors and opportunities in the relations of these two countries. Therefore, it is imperative to continue studying the geopolitical interests of the United States in Central Asia and Kyrgyzstan in the area of international security.

Keywords: USA, stages, Central Asia, American politics, New Silk Road, Big Central Asia, Astana declaration, Encyclopedia of Afghan Jihad, regional security, Kygyzstan

DOI:

10.25136/2409-868X.2018.9.27034

Article was received:

04-08-2018


Review date:

02-08-2018


Publish date:

28-09-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Ogurtsova M.I. Strategiya SShA v Tsentral'noi Azii (1990 2013) // Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Zarubezhnoe regionovedenie. Vostokovedenie. 2014. 18. S. 205-213.
2.
Adams B. The New Empire. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1902. 255 pp.
3.
Teilor P. Dzh. Vtoraya mirovaya voina: Dva vzglyada. M.: Mysl', 1995.
4.
Taylor P. J. Political Geography: World-Economy, Nation-State and Locality. London: Harlow, 2000.
5.
Arbatov G. Sovremennaya vneshnyaya politika SShA. Otv.red. Trofimenko G. M.: Nauka, 1984. S.33-36.
6.
Braterskii M.V. SShA i problemnye strany Azii: obosnovanie, vyrabotka i realizatsiya politiki v 1990-2005 gg. M.: 2005. S.178-191.
7.
Utkin A.I. Mirovoi poryadok v KhKhI veke. M: Eksmo, 2002.
8.
Utkin A. Doktrina Busha: kontseptsiya, razdelivshaya Ameriku // Rossiya v global'noi politike. 2005.-4.
9.
Pleshakov K.V. Komponenty geopoliticheskogo myshleniya // Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 1994. 10.
10.
Kopylov A. O ponyatii natsional'naya bezopasnost' v amerikanskoi politologii // Bezopasnost'. 1996. 3-4.
11.
Kopylov A. Politika natsional'noi bezopasnosti SShA v 90-e gody: soderzhanie i protsess realizatsii. Monografiya. M.: VAGSh, 1999.
12.
Kopylov A. Sovremennaya voennaya strategiya SShA: soderzhanie i tendentsii razvitiya. M.: VAGSh, 2006.
13.
Kopylov A. Sovremennaya strategiya natsional'noi bezopasnosti SShA: kontseptsii i politicheskaya praktika. M.: VAGSh, 2009.
14.
Nichol J. Central Asia: Regional Developments and Implications for U.S. Interests. // Congressional Research Service 7-5700, RL33458, CRS Report, Prepared for Members and Committees Congress. March 21, 2014. 9-page.
15.
Cranston A. Central Asia in Transition. Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1992.
16.
Braterskii M. SShA i problemnye strany Azii: obosnovanie, vyrabotka i realizatsiya politiki v 1990-2005 gg. M: MONF, 2005. S.178-191.
17.
Rumer E. SShA i Tsentral'naya Aziya posle 11 sentyabrya // Rossiya i musul'manskii mir. 2003. 11. C. 90-103.
18.
Riedel B. The Search for Al Qaeda: Its Leadership, Ideology, and Future. Washigton: Brookings Institution Press, 2010. Pp. 121-122.
19.
BBC News. [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: http://web.archive.org/web /20160511220657/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3966817.st (data obrashcheniya 11.05.2016)
20.
CNN. [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: http://edition.cnn.com:80/2001/US/09/ 16/inv.binladen.denial/index.html?iref=storysearch (data obrashcheniya 14.11.2015)
21.
CNN. U.S. rejects Taliban offer to try bin Laden. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/10/07/ret.us.taliban/ (data obrashcheniya 4.03.2016)
22.
Vyazgina E.A. Ideya Bol'shoi Tsentral'noi Azii vo vneshnepoliticheskikh diskussiyakh v SShA (2004-2008) // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 8: Istoriya. 2010. 4. C. 101-116
23.
U.S. Department of State, Secretary Clinton Co-Chairs the New Silk Road Ministerial Meeting // DipNoteFact Sheet on New Silk Road Ministerial. September 22, 2011. See also U.S. Department of State, Remarks Robert D. Hormats, Under Secretary for Economic, Energy and Agricultural Affairs, Address to the SAIS Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and DSIS Forum. September 29, 2011.
24.
Council of the European Union, Uzbekistan: Council Adopts Restrictive Measures: U.S. officials argued that the United States already had been limiting military assistance at congressional request-because of human rights abuses // Press Release. 2005. No.14392/05.
25.
U.S. Senate, Committee on Armed Services, Testimony of the Director of Central Intelligence, The Honorable Porter J, Goss. March 17, 2005.
26.
U.S. Department of State, Press Statement: U.S. Department of State Designates the Islamic Jihad Group Under Executive Order 13224, May 26, 2005; U.N. Security Council, The Al-Qaida and Taliban Sanctions Committee, Press Release: Security Council Committee AddsOne Entity to AL-Qaida Section of Consolidated List, SC/8405, June 3, 2005.