Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1930,   Articles in work: 305 Declined articles: 749 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Qualitative criteria in philosophical and social sciences: human problem and the fifth world theory
Nekrasov Stanislav Nikolaevich

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the department of Culturology and Design, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin

620002, Russia, Sverdlovskaya oblast', g. Ekaterinburg, ul. Mira, 19, of. I-314

nekrasov-ural@yandex.ru

Abstract.

The object of this research is the philosophical and social sciences in Russia and their decline in the conditions of Marxist dogmatism, bureaucratic idealism and shift in social formation. The subject of this research is the introduction of qualitative criteria into social sciences and the transition from studying an abstract human towards examination of the human in history. The author carefully reviews the vanishing of nonscientific terminological problematic of anthropology, theory of personality and humanization of social relations; however, special attention is given to such process of knowledge reproduction, within which in light of the integral fifth world theory this terminology becomes scientific. One of the research methods is the detection of structuralistic project of refusal from studying a human and the emergence of post-structuralistic Marxism. The other method is associated with the formation of the fifth world theory of civilizational neo-industrialism. The main conclusion lies in the statement that the formation of theory and practice of civilizational neo-industrialism suggests no the refusal from applying the concept of human, but rather the transition towards development of the connection between social relations and real people. Special contribution to this research is the substantiation of the need for reviving the values of Russian philosophy and social science for turning the situation in science. The scientific novelty consists in raising a question about the introduction of qualitative criteria into social sciences, which implies the transition from studying an abstract human towards examination of human in people’s environment, as well as substantiation of civilizing mission of neo-industrialism, which demonstrates the exhaustiveness of capitalism and completeness of the second attempt of building socialism.

Keywords: civilization neoindustrialism, fifth world theory, poststructuralism, theoretical anti-humanism, human rights, bureaucratic idealism, four quality criteria, qualitative criteria, andragogy of neoindustrialism, drugcontrerocksexculture

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2018.9.27157

Article was received:

20-08-2018


Review date:

17-08-2018


Publish date:

21-09-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Bakshutov V. K. Filosofiya chuvstv. Ekaterinburg: izdatel'stvo UrO RAN, 1996. 491 s.
2.
Berezovskii: igra bez pravil. O roli somnitel'noi lichnosti v istorii. Kollektiv avtorov. M.: Ros. pisatel', 2002. 219 s.
3.
Voprosy filosofii. 1988. № 9. Problemy izucheniya istorii russkoi filosofii i kul'tury. Materialy "kruglogo stola". (Vystupleniya L. V. Polyakova, E. B. Rashkovskogo, I. M. Klyamkina, V. F. Pustarnakova, L. A. Kogana, V. I. Guseva, A. A. Nuikina, V. D. Oskotskogo, A. V. Gulygi, E. G. Plimaka, V. A. Tvardovskoi, Yu. V. Manna, 3. A. Kamenskogo, V. I. Kerimova, G. K. Vagnera, V. V. Erofeeva, Al. V. Mikhailova, T. B. Lyubimovoi, E. Yu. Solov'eva, V. K. Kantora, V. G. Khorosa, S. L. Kravtsa, O. A. Proskurina, A. N. Arkhangel'skogo, A. I. Volodina, 3. V. Smirnovoi, B. M. Shakhmatova.)
4.
Gobozov I. A. Lui Al'tyuser–vydayushchiisya filosof-marksist XX veka: Autentichnoe prochtenie Marksa – M.: LELAND, 2015. 120 s. (Razmyshlyaya o marksizme. № 109.)
5.
Dugin A. G. Chetvertaya politicheskaya teoriya. Rossiya i politicheskie idei KhKhI veka. – SPb.: Amfora, 2009. 343 s.
6.
Kara-Murza S. G. Evrei, dissidenty i evrokommunizm. M.: Algoritm, 2001. 256 s.
7.
Katasonov V. Yu. Kapitalizm. Istoriya i ideologiya «denezhnoi tsivilizatsii». Izd. 4-e dopolnennoe. M.: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii. 2015. 1120 s.
8.
Literaturnaya gazeta, 1989, № 3.
9.
Nekrasov S.N. Kak obrazovat' vzroslykh. Andragogika neoindustrializma – nauka KhKhI veka. Ekaterinburg: izd. Ural'skoe, 2010. 344 s.
10.
Nikitinskii L. Trudno delat' dobro. Fond Sorosa: 1987 – 1997. M.: Institut Otkrytoe obshchestvo, 1997. 103 s.
11.
Rubakin N. A. Sredi knig. T. 1. M.: Nauka, 1911. 223 s.
12.
Soros Dzh. Otkrytoe obshchestvo. Reformiruya global'nyi kapitalizm. M.: Institut Otkrytoe obshchestvo, 2001. 464 s.
13.
Fedorov S. N. Put' istseleniya. M.: Reklamno-izdatel'skii tsentr "Fedorov", 1995. 158 s.
14.
Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. SPb: A-Cad, 1995. 407 s.
15.
Althusser, L. Reponse a John Lewis. Paris: François Maspero. 1973. 116 p.
16.
Lewis J. The marxism of Marx. L.: Lawrence and Wishart, 1972. 274 p.
17.
Cornu A. Marx, le rejet de la theorie de la valeur de Ricardo et la critique de la notion de travail chez Hegel // La Pensee. Revue du rationalisme moderne. № 194. Aout 1977. 3–18 pp.
18.
Frow J. Marxism and literary history. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986. 304 p.