Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2004,   Articles in work: 336 Declined articles: 786 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Implementation of the Parallel Investigation in Criminal Procedure
Topilina Tatiana

Master’s degree, Institute of Advocacy, Kutafin Moscow State Law University

125993, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, 9

markova.tatyana.a@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The subject of the research is the legal norms of the Russian and foreign legislation governing the procedure for obtaining an expert opinion as well as the procedure and methods for challenging it, judicial practice and developed theoretical propositions. The object of the research is the public relations arising in connection with the implementation of advocacy activities challenging the expert's opinion in the court of first instance. The author focuses on the continental and Anglo-Saxon system of investigation in criminal procedure. Special attention is paid to the discussion about the possibility of introducing "parallel investigation" into criminal procedure in the countries of the continental legal family. The methodological basis of the research is a set of general, particular and special research methods. In the course of the study the author has used the dialectical method, systemic and comparative legal methods. As a result of the research, the author comes to the following conclusions: the existing division of the procedure for obtaining an expert opinion based on differences between continental and Anglo-Saxon legal systems does not correspond to the realities of the modern world; and special contribution of the author is a comprehensive comparative legal study of the institution of an expert opinion in criminal procedure. 
 

Keywords: PARALLEL INVESTIGATION, ADVOCATE INVESTIGATION, EXPERT EVIDENCE, EXPERT OPINION, EXPERTISE, SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE, JUDICIAL EXAMINATION, EXPERT, CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, THE COLLECTION OF PROOFS

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7810.2018.3.27166

Article was received:

17-08-2018


Review date:

22-08-2018


Publish date:

23-08-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ (red. ot 19.02.2018) // Rossiiskaya gazeta. № 249. 22.12.2001.
2.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks RSFSR (utv. VS RSFSR 27.10.1960) (red. ot 29.12.2001, s izm. ot 26.11.2002) // Svod zakonov RSFSR. t. 8. s. 613.
3.
Postanovlenie Evropeiskogo suda po pavam cheloveka ot 25.07.2013 po delu «Khodorkovskii i Lebedev (KHODORKOVSKIY AND LEBEDEV) protiv RF» (Zhaloby № 11082/06 i 13772/05) // Postanovlenie polucheno s servera Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka .
4.
Postanovlenie ESPCh ot 27.03.2014 «Delo «Matytsina (Matytsina) protiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (zhaloba № 58428/10) // Pretsedenty Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. 2014. № 4(04).
5.
Zinin A.M., Goryanov Yu.I. Ispol'zovanie instituta sudebnoi ekspertizy v usloviyakh realizatsii printsipa sostyazatel'nosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Lex Russica (Nauchnye trudy MGYuA). 2005. No 3. S. 497-513.
6.
V.A. Kirina. (Ne)Ravenstvo storon v ugolovnom proizvodstve. Ukrainskaya versiya // Izdanie «YuRIST & ZAKON». 2017. №19.
7.
E.R. Rossinskaya, E.I. Galyashina. Nastol'naya kniga sud'i: sudebnaya ekspertiza. — Moskva: R76 Prospekt, 2010. — 464 s. S. 149.
8.
Samuticheva E.Yu. Zaklyuchenie eksperta i ego otsenka v ugolovnom protsesse. S. 67.
9.
Federal'nye pravila dokazyvaniya 1975g. (red. ot 01.12.2015) (Federal Rulesof Evidence) // URL: https://www.rulesofevidence.org/article-vii/rule-706/ (data obrashcheniya 11.04.2018).
10.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeks Germanii 1877 g. [versiya na nemetskom yazyke (v versii, opublikovannoi 07.04.1987, red. ot 30.10.2017): URL: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stpo/BJNR006290950.html (data poslednego obrashcheniya: 06.04.2018); versiya na angliiskom yazyke (po sost. na 23.04.2014): URL: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stpo/index.html (data poslednego obrashcheniya: 06.04.2018)].
11.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Ukrainy ot 13.04.2012 № 4651-VI (red. ot 16 marta 2018 g.) // Golos Ukrainy. 19.05.2012. № 90-91.
12.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Respubliki Belarus' ot 16 iyulya 1999 goda № 295-Z (red. ot 20 yanvarya 2018 g.) // Natsional'nyi reestr pravovykh aktov Respubliki Belarus'. 2000. № 77-78, 2/71.
13.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 4 iyulya 2014 goda № 231-V (red. ot 01 marta 2018 g.) // Kazakhstanskaya pravda. 10 iyulya 2014 g. № 133 (27754).
14.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Respubliki Armeniya ot 1 sentyabrya 1998 goda № ZR-248 (red. ot 07 iyulya 2016 g.) // Ofitsial'nye vedomosti Respubliki Armeniya. 21 sentyabrya 1998 goda. №22 (55).
15.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Azerbaidzhanskoi Respubliki, utverzhdennyi Zakonom Azerbaidzhanskoi Respubliki ot 14 iyulya 2000 goda № 907-IQ (red. ot 30 sentyabrya 2016 g.) // Sbornik zakonodatel'nykh aktov Azerbaidzhanskoi Respubliki. 2000 god. № 8.
16.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Respubliki Moldova ot 14 marta 2003 goda №122-XV (red. ot 21 iyulya 2017 g.) // Ofitsial'nyi monitor Respubliki Moldova, №104-110. 7 iyunya 2003 goda. St.447.
17.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Kyrgyzskoi Respubliki ot 30 iyunya 1999 goda №62 (red. ot 04 dekabrya 2017 g.) // "Erkin Too" ot 21 iyulya 1999 goda №59-62.
18.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Respubliki Tadzhikistan ot 3 dekabrya 2009 goda (red. ot 24 fevralya 2017 g.) // http://base.mmk.tj/view_sanadhoview.php?showdetail=&sanadID=334.
19.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Respubliki Tadzhikistan ot 3 dekabrya 2009 goda (red. ot 24 fevralya 2017 g.) // http://base.mmk.tj/view_sanadhoview.php?showdetail=&sanadID=334.
20.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Turkmenistana ot 18 aprelya 2009 goda (red. ot 01 marta 2018 g.) // Vedomosti Medzhlisa Turkmenistana, 2009 g., № 2, st. 29.
21.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Germanii 1877 g. [versiya na nemetskom yazyke (v versii, opublikovannoi 07.04.1987, red. ot 30.10.2017): URL: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stpo/BJNR006290950.html (data poslednego obrashcheniya: 06.04.2018); versiya na angliiskom yazyke (po sost. na 23.04.2014): URL: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stpo/index.html (data poslednego obrashcheniya: 06.04.2018)].
22.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Frantsii [versiya na frantsuzskom yazyke (v versii, opublikovannoi 02.03.1959, red. ot 02.04.2018): URL: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do;jsessionid=379DCF5BB268E0BC225B50D0307C8BA0.tplgfr33s_1?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006071154&dateTexte=20180408 (data poslednego obrashcheniya: 08.04.2018).
23.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Gruzii ot 09 oktyabrya 2009 goda № 1772 (red. ot 23 dekabrya 2017 g.) // Zakonodatel'nyi Vestnik Gruzii-ZVG, 31, 03/11/2009.
24.
Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Italii ot 24 oktyabrya 1989 goda (red. ot 08.04.2018) [versiya na ital'yanskom yazyke (v versii, opublikovannoi 24.10.1989, red. ot 08.04.2018): URL: http://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:decreto.del.presidente.della.repubblica:1988-09-22;447 (data poslednego obrashcheniya: 08.04.2018).
25.
Ugolovnyi kodeks Niderlandov 1886 g. (red. ot 01.01.2018) versiya na niderlandskom yazyke: URL: http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0001903/2018-01-01 (data poslednego obrashcheniya: 08.04.2018).
26.
Spencer J. R. Evidence // European criminal procedures/ Ed. byM. Delmas-Marty, J.R. Spencer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. P. 634.
27.
Redmayne, M. // Expert evidence and criminal justice (Oxford monographs on criminal law and criminal justice). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2001. P. 198.
28.
Sumuel R. Gross // Expert evidence. Wisconsin L. Rev. 1991. P. 1189-1230.