Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2054,   Articles in work: 303 Declined articles: 784 
Library

Back to contents

Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Social being of personality in the context of socio-historical totality of the performative interpretation
Smirnov Maksim Valer'evich

Post-graduate student, the department of History and Philosophy, Cherepovets State University

162602, Russia, Vologodskaya oblast', g. Cherepovets, Sovetskii prospekt, 10

SmirnovM_92@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The object of this research is the concept of performative interpretation as a discursive-historical hegemony of socio-metaphysical system of thought. The subject is the substantiation of the performative interpretation from the perspective of the principle of totality. The research is structure on the basis of the idea of performative interpretation of M. Foucault, as well as several modern sociological theories of the performative utterance, who assign a central role in formation and perception of social relations, rules and practices to the language. The goal of this article is to signify and adjust the understanding of the subject of research for the social philosophy, its role in the establishment and totalization of comprehension of the social being of personality, and the boundaries of its self-reflection. The study is conducted on the example of socio-philosophical analysis of the meaning of Marxist-Hegelian discourse of continental philosophy – its consideration from the standpoint of the totality of performative interpretation. Using the principle of dialectical complementarity, the author underlines the correlation between the sociological theories oriented towards the feedback, and the dialectical principle of totality. In the course of the research, the author demonstrates the inner contradictions of M. Foucault’s concept of performative interpretation with his epistemological theory; as well as the fact and consequences of neglecting by the theories of peformativity of the Hegelian principle of totality, namely the structural-semiological totality of language of J. Lacan (dimension of the symbolic). It is depicted that personality not only reproduces and follows certain performative act, but remains in the totality of performative interpretation, which reproduces the discourses, ideology and boundaries of their articulation. Application of the principle of totality into the research of social performative utterances will allow establishing the more harmonious feedback with the actants, as well as create the interdisciplinary relations between the idealistic metaphysics and such sociological movements as the actor-network theory and normative sociology.

Keywords: power relations, denotative, discourse, structural-semiological totality, principle of totality, social metaphysics, performative interpretation, ideology, feedback, normative sociology

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2019.1.27447

Article was received:

19-09-2018


Review date:

20-09-2018


Publish date:

24-01-2019


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Al'tyusser L. Ideologiya i ideologicheskie apparaty gosudarstva (zametki dlya issledovaniya) / Per. s fr. S. Ryndina // Neprikosnovennyi zapas, 2011. – № 3(77). [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2011/3/al3.html
2.
Anderson P. Istoki postmoderna / Per. s angl. A. Appolonova pod red. M. Mayatskogo. – M.: Izdatel'skii dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2011. – 208 s.
3.
Vindel'band V. Izbrannoe. Dukh i istoriya / Per. s nem. M. I. Levinoi, G. Sonina. – M.: Yurist, 1995 – 687 s.
4.
Vul'f K. K genezisu sotsial'nogo. Mimezis, performativnost', ritual / Per. s nem. G. Khaidarovoi. – SPb.: Intersotsis, 2009 – 164 s.
5.
Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Tysyacha plato: kapitalizm i shizofreniya / Per. s fr. Ya. I. Svirskogo. – Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya, 2010. – 895 s.
6.
Derrida Zh. O grammatologii / Per. s fr. N. Avtonomovoi. – M.: Ad Marginem, 2000. – 511 s.
7.
Derrida Zh. Polya filosofii / Per. s fr. D. Yu. Kralechkina. M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2012. – 376 s.
8.
Il'in M. V. Chto mozhet dat' analiz performativov? // Politicheskaya nauka, 2016. – № 4. – S. 262 – 270.
9.
Kollingvud R. Dzh. Printsipy iskusstva / Per. s angl. A. G. Rakina pod red. E. I. Staf'evoi. – M.: «Yazyki russkoi kul'tury», 1999. – 328 s.
10.
Lakan Zh. Raboty Freida po tekhnike psikhoanaliza (Seminar, Kniga 1 (1953/54)) / Per. s fr. M. Titovoi, A. Chernoglazova. – M.: Gnozis, 2009. – 432 s.
11.
Markuze G. Odnomernyi chelovek / Per. s angl. A. Yudina. – M.: «REFL-book», 1994. – 368 s.
12.
Fuko M. «Nitsshe, Freid, Marks» / Per. s fr. E. Nikulina // Al'manakh «Kentavr», 1994. – №2. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.lib.ru/%3E%3C/CULTURE/FUKO/nfm.txt
13.
Ferklou N. Dialektika diskursa // Sovremennyi diskurs-analiz. – № 1. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://discourseanalysis.org/ada1/st9.shtml
14.
Khobsbaum E. Izobretenie traditsii // Evraziya, 2000. – S. 47 – 62. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/izobretenie-traditsiy
15.
Chubarov I. M. Fiktivnoe nachalo i vnenakhodimyi razum: Marks, Nitsshe, Freid // Filosofskaya mysl', 2016. – № 11. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_20568.html
16.
Althusser L. Essays in Self-Criticism. – Paris, 1974. – 224 p. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.marx2mao.com/Other/ESC76NB.html
17.
Jameson F. Valences of the dialectic. – London, NY: Verso, 2009. – 612 p.
18.
Laclau E., Mouffe C. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Second Edition. – London: Verso, 2001. – 198 p.