Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1982,   Articles in work: 307 Declined articles: 755 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Peculiarities of the Russian anarchic discourse in post-Soviet era
Martynov Mikhail

PhD in Philosophy

Scientific Research of Research and Development Department, Chuvash State Art museum

428003, Russia, respublika Chuvashskaya, g. Cheboksary, ul. Kalinina, 60, kab. 311A

viveg@rambler.ru

Abstract.

This article analyzes the peculiarities of the Russian anarchic discourse of post-Soviet era in correlation with the key attributes of the Soviet political discourse. Soviet government viewed anarchists as the antagonistic political power; therefore, the activity of anarchistic organizations in the Soviet Union was prohibited. Russian anarchism started to reappear only in the late 1980’s, when the declining Soviet state was losing control over the political situation. The main attention is given to the analysis of peculiarities attained by the Russian anarchic discourse during this period in the context of confrontation with Soviet ideology. The article uses the methodology of the French school of discourse analysis that is oriented towards the study of political texts and considers discourse as the product of ideology. The anarchic discourse implies such language activity of the anarchists that features the values of the anarchic worldview. The author notes the anti-Soviet tune of the anarchists in the end of the XX century, demonstrating that the establishment of key parameters closely relates to the criticism of Soviet worldview and Soviet ideological language. For example, the parameters of the Soviet political discourse “nominalization” and related to it process of depersonalization are opposed to the attention to real subject of speech and polysemicity. The refusal from the Soviet ideological language also manifested in the anarchists’ use of the letters from Russian alphabet (i, ъ and others), which were excluded after the spelling reform of 1917-1918, i.e. already during the Soviet time. The pre-reform elements can be seen in the various anarchistic texts and make an overal  impression of non-Sovietness.

Keywords: Seriot, nominalization, power, Soviet political discourse, anarchist discourse, discourse, anarchism, ASSA, USSR, ideology

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2018.10.27670

Article was received:

13-10-2018


Review date:

14-10-2018


Publish date:

21-10-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Serio P. Kak chitayut teksty vo Frantsii // Stepanov Yu. S. (red.) Kvadratura smysla: Frantsuzskaya shkola analiza diskursa. — M.: Progress, 1999. — S. 12–53.
2.
Stepanov Yu. S. Al'ternativnyi mir, Diskurs, Fakt i printsip Prichinnosti // Stepanov Yu. S. (red.) Yazyk i nauka kontsa 20 veka. — M.: RGGU, 1995. — S. 35–73.
3.
Confino M. Idéologie et sémantique: Le vocabulaire politique des anarchistes russes // Cahiers du monde russe et Soviétique. — 1989. — 3/4. — P. 255–284.
4.
Buchenkov D. E. Anarkhisty v Rossii v kontse XX veka. — M.: LIBROKOM, 2011. — 160 s.
5.
Raush P. Anarkhicheskoe dvizhenie Pitera (1988–1996). URL: https://ru.theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-aleksandrovich-raush-anarhicheskoe-dvijenie-pitera-1988-1996 (data obrashcheniya: 28.08.2018).
6.
Serio P. Russkii yazyk i sovetskii politicheskii diskurs: analiz nominalizatsii // Stepanov Yu. S. (red.) Kvadratura smysla: Frantsuzskaya shkola analiza diskursa. — M.: Progress, 1999. — S. 337–384.
7.
Zhizhek S. Vozvyshennyi ob''ekt ideologii. — M.: Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal, 1999. — 234 s.
8.
Yurchak A. Eto bylo navsegda, poka ne konchilos'. Poslednee sovetskoe pokolenie. — M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie 2014. — 664 s.
9.
Shubin A. V. Mesto «Obshchiny» v razvitii libertarnoi i sotsialisticheskoi mysli // Pryamukhinskie chteniya 2013 goda. — M.: Futuris, 2014. — S. 109–118.
10.
Shul'ts V. L., Lyubimova T. M. «Derevyannyi yazyk» kak zerkalo revolyutsii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. — 2015. — № 1. — S. 136–145.
11.
Kornilov S. G. i dr. (red.) Pryamukhinskie chteniya 2011 goda. — M.: Tipografiya «Futuris», 2012. — 100 s.
12.
Tolstoi L. N. Tsarstvo Bozhie vnutri vas // Tolstoi L. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. Tom 28. — M.: Gosudarstvennoe Izdatel'stvo Khudozhestvennoi Literatury, 1957. — 398 s.
13.
Dam'e V. V. Istoriya anarkho-sindikalizma. Kratkii ocherk. — M.: Knizhnyi dom «LIBROKOM», 2010. — 152 s.
14.
«Levyi marsh Alekseya Nikonova». Vyborg. URL: http://postank.narod.ru/vyborg1998.html (data obrashcheniya: 28.08.2018).
15.
Vlasenko E., Kirilenko A. Chego anarkhiya mat'? // Radio Svoboda. Interv'yu 18 Fevralya 2011 goda. URL: https://www.svoboda.org/a/2312628.html (data obrashcheniya: 28.08.2018).
16.
Chernaya Meri. Chernyi Blok: vzglyad iznutri // Avtonom. 5 iyulya 2009. URL: https://avtonom.org/pages/chernyy-blok-vzglyad-iznutri (data obrashcheniya: 28.08.2018).