Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1989,   Articles in work: 305 Declined articles: 758 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Correlation of the concepts of good faith in international law and law of the United States
Vinokurov Sergei Nikolaevich

Post-graduate student, the department of Civil Law and Procedure and Private International Law, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia; Master of Jurisprudence; Lawyer

117198, Russia, gorod Moskva, g. Moscow, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, 6, of. 359

vinokurovs@mail.ru

 

 

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the interpretation of the concepts of good faith and the related concept of fair dealing in the area of international law and domestic law of the United States. The author examines not only the content of these concepts by the international legal category and American law, but also attempts to find similarities and differences in understanding of these concepts. The principle of good faith is has become mainstream in the law of the United States, which is common to the countries of general law. At the same time, multiple international conventions that regulate both, the private international relations and public international relations, in its text contain the requirement on good faith and fair dealing. The main conclusion lies in determination of the structural nature of the principle of good faith as an international legal concept in international law, as well as description of the content of good faith accepted in the law of the United States. The author underlines the inconsistencies in the content of good faith in the American law at the doctrinal level and the level of judicial practice. The article covers the role of good faith and fair dealing in regulating legal relations in the United States. Moreover, the author identifies certain common features and crucial differences betweeb understanding of good faith in the international law based on the conventions ratified in the United States and understanding of good faith in the American law.

Keywords: guiltiness, estoppel, convention, international, American, USA, law, good faith, ratio, bad faith

DOI:

10.25136/2306-9899.2018.4.27808

Article was received:

26-10-2018


Review date:

30-10-2018


Publish date:

01-11-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Berger K.P., Arnts T., Printsip dobrosovestnosti v angliiskom kommercheskom dogovornom prave. Obzor aktual'noi angliiskoi sudebnoi praktiki, Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava, 2016, 3.
2.
S.C. Styles, Good Faith: A Principled Matter, Good Faith in Contract and Property, Oxford, Portland: Hart Publishing, 1999. pp. 160-161, 168.
3.
Allan E. Farnsworth, The Concept of Good Faith in American Law, Roma, April (1993).
4.
G. Fitzmaurice, The General Principles of International Law, Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law, 92 Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de Droit International, 1957, p. 7.
5.
United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, April 11, 1980, S. Treaty Doc. No. 98-9 (1983) 19 I.L.M. 668, (1980), (entered into force on Jan. 1, 1988).
6.
John O. Honnold, Documentary History of the Uniform Law for International Sales. Springer, 1989, p. 298, 342, 479.
7.
Peter Schlechtriem, Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG), 61 (Geoffrey Thomas trans., Clarendon Press 2d ed. 1998), pp. 65, 63.
8.
Paul J. Powers, Defining the Undefinable: Good Faith and the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, 18 Journal of Law and Commerce, 1999, pp. 333-353.
9.
https://www.unidroit.org/instruments/commercial-contracts/unidroit-principles-2016
10.
http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/law_treaties.shtml
11.
I.I. Lukashuk, The Principle Pacta Sunt Servanda and the Nature of Obligation under International Law, (83) AJIL, 1989, r. 513.
12.
Hersch Lauterpacht, Oppenheim's International Law, 8th edition, Longmans 1955, r. 345.
13.
A. Kiss, Abuse of Rights in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law [MPEPIL], December 2006, para 4 f.
14.
I.C. MacGibbon, Estoppel in International Law International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 7, 1958, pp. 468, 471.
15.
J. Crawford, Brownlies Principles of Public International Law, 8th edition, Oxford University Press, September 2012, p. 421.
16.
Case: McIlkenny v Chief Constable of the West Midlands, [1980] 2 All ER 227 (Q.B.).
17.
S. Litvinoff, Good faith, Tulane Law Review, Vol. 71, New Orleans, 1997, pp. 1645-1675.
18.
I.C. MacGibbon, The scope of acquiescence in International Law, British Year Book of International Law, London 1954, Vol. 31, pp. 143186.
19.
Malcolm N. Shaw, International Law, 6th edition, Cambridge University Press, October 2008, p. 1017.
20.
Joseph F. O'Connor, Good faith in International Law, Aldershot, 1991, p. 95-96.
21.
Collier John and Vaughan Lowe, The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures, Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 21.
22.
A. Verdross, Die bona fides als Grundlage des Volkerrechts Gegenwarts probleme des internationalen Rechts und der Rechtphilosophie, 1953, Bd. 29, s. 33.
23.
The Restatement (second) of the Law of Contracts, 2d. Vol. 2, American Law Institute Publishers, 1981, 205 (Every contract impose upon each party a duty of good faith and fair dealing in its performance and its enforcement).
24.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc
25.
Jack Beatson and Daniel Friedmann, Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1995, p. 159.
26.
Case: Carmichael v Adirondack Bottled Gas Corporation of Vermont, 635 A2d 1211, per Judge Morse (Vt, 1993) p. 1216.
27.
Case: Olympus Hills Shopping Center Ltd v Smiths Food & Drug Centers Ltd, 889 P2d 445, per Judge Jackson (Utah App, 1994) p. 450.
28.
Case: Eis v Meyer 566 A2d 422, per Judge Hull (Conn, 1989) p. 426.
29.
Allan E. Farnsworth, Farnsworth on Contracts, Second edition, Aspen Law & Business, 1998, vol 2, p. 341.
30.
Allan E. Farnsworth, Good Faith Performance and Commercial Reasonableness Under the Uniform Commercial Code, 30 U. Chi. L. Rev. (1963), p. 672.
31.
Emily Houh, The Doctrine of Good Faith in Contract Law: A (Nearly) Empty Vessel? Utah Law Review, Vol. 1, 2005, p. 50.
32.
Robert Braucher, The Legislative History of the Uniform Commercial Code, 58 Columbia Law Review 798, 1958, p. 812.
33.
Case: Best v United States National Bank of Oregon, 303 Ore 557, per Judge Lent (Ore, 1987), pp. 562, 564.
34.
Case: Reid v Key Bank of Southern Maine Inc., 821 F2d 9, (US App, 1987), p. 15.
35.
Case: Luedtke v Nabors Alaska Drilling Inc., 834 P2d 1220, per Judge Compton (Alas, 1992), p. 1224.
36.
Robert S. Summers, Good Faith in General Contract Law and Sales Provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, Virginia Law Review, 1968, Vol. 54, No. 2, p. 200, 201.
37.
Robert S. Summers, The General Duty of Good Faith-its Recognition and Conceptualization, 67 Cornell L. Rev., (1982), pp. 810, 818, 820.
38.
S.J. Burton, Breach of contract and the common law duty to perform in good faith, Harvard Law Review, 1980-1981, pr. 369, 373.
39.
S.J. Burton, Good Faith Performance of a Contract Within Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, 67 Iowa L. Rev. 1, (1981).
40.
Case: Foley v Interactive Data Corp., 765 P.2d 373, 392-93 (California 1988)