Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1989,   Articles in work: 305 Declined articles: 758 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Back to contents

Monitoring of public inquiry (educational aspects) as a mechanism of setting managerial tasks within the system public education
Arinushkina Anna Aleksandrovna

Doctor of Pedagogy

Chief Scientific Associate, Center for Informatization of Education, Institute of Education Management of the Russian Academy of Education

105062, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Makarenko, 5/16, of. 403V

hr_mpsi@mail.ru
Bakhtin Maksim Borisovich

PhD in Sociology

Deputy Development Director, Institute of Education Management of the Russian Academy of Education

105062, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Zhukovskogo, 16, of. 418

mbbahtin@rambler.ru
Dovbysh Svetlana Evgenyevna

Head of the department of Education Law and Control, Institute of Education Management of the Russian Academy of Education

105062, Russia, Makarenk oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Zhukovskogo, 16, of. 420

dse.post@inbox.ru

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the socio-pedagogical situation aimed at improving the system of public education in the Russian Federation at the federal and general levels. The authors examine such aspects as the “feedback” from the direct consumers of educational services, key stakeholders of the system of public education, which manifests as the most realistic view of the socio-educational situation. Special attention is given to assessment of the potential of diagnostic tools in the system of public education, classification and analysis of public inquiry through acknowledged through the citizen appeals. The authors identify the structure of citizen appeals on the questions of public education, speed of the response to such appeals; provide substantiation of managerial solutions with regards to improving the system of public education at all levels. The special contribution of the authors into this topic lies in structuring and posing the tasks pertinent to implementation and analysis of the results of citizen appeals and mechanisms of managerial models at all levels of the system of public education. The scientific novelty is defined by the fact that this article is first to consider modification of public inquiry as the instrument and foundation for managerial decision making applicable to changes in the system of public education (content, limits of cooperation between the subjects of educational processes and key stakeholders of public education). The main conclusion consists in substantiation of the need for development of the consulting support of education management at all levels of the system of public education.

Keywords: quality education assessment, public examination, education system development, public administration of education, public partisipation, general education content, monitoring of citizens 'appeals, general education system, organizational and pedagogical interaction, Evaluation of Educational Quality

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8736.2018.4.27862

Article was received:

31-10-2018


Review date:

01-11-2018


Publish date:

05-11-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Agranovich M. L. Indikatory v upravlenii obrazovaniem: chto pokazyvayut i kuda vedut? //Voprosy obrazovaniya. 2008. . 1.
2.
Adamskii A. Otsenka kachestva obrazovaniya nevozmozhna bez uchastiya grazhdanskikh institutov //Narodnoe obrazovanie. 2007. . 4. S. 24-24.
3.
Bolotov V. A. i dr. Analiz opyta sozdaniya Rossiiskoi sistemy otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya. Chast' 1 //Upravlenie obrazovaniem: teoriya i praktika. 2011. . 2 (2).
4.
Bolotov V. A. i dr. Rossiiskaya sistema otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya: glavnye uroki //Kachestvo obrazovaniya v Evrazii. 2013. . 1.
5.
Val'dman I. A. Klyuchevye aspekty kachestva obrazovaniya: uroki mezhdunarodnogo opyta //Upravlenie obrazovaniem: teoriya i praktika. 2011. . 1 (1).
6.
Konasova N. Obshchestvennaya ekspertiza kachestva shkol'nogo obrazovaniya. Litres, 2017.
7.
Kosaretskii S. G., Sedel'nikov i dr. Gosudarstvenno-obshchestvennoe upravlenie obrazovatel'nym uchrezhdeniem v voprosakh i otvetakh Moskva, 2015. 106 s. (Seriya Biblioteka shkol'nogo upravlyayushchego)
8.
Krylova N. B. V sisteme pokazatelei kachestva vazhen vybor prioritetov! //Narodnoe obrazovanie. 2011. . 6. S. 17-25.
9.
Kuznetsov S. V., Tyulicheva L. D. Razvitie instituta gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva v protsesse modernizatsii professional'nogo obrazovaniya //Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2014. . 3. S. 53-58
10.
Maiorov A. N. Novye formy uchastiya obshchestvennykh institutov v upravlenii obrazovaniem v sootvetstvii s polozheniyami zakonodatel'stva ob obrazovanii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii //Tsennosti i smysly. 2014. . 2 (30).
11.
Mertsalova T. A. Informatsionnaya otkrytost' sistemy obrazovaniya: voprosy effektivnosti gosudarstvennoi politiki //Voprosy obrazovaniya. 2015. . 2.
12.
Moiseev A. M. Strategicheskoe upravlenie shkoloi //Narodnoe obrazovanie. 2010. . 5. S. 69-74.
13.
Potemkina T. V., Pudenko T. I. Nezavisimaya otsenka kachestva obrazovaniya: obshchestvennaya ekspertiza v zarubezhnoi i rossiiskoi praktike //Obrazovanie i nauka. 2015. . 10 (129).
14.
Subetto, A.I. Kachestvo nepreryvnogo obrazovaniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: sostoyanie, tendentsii, problemy, prognozy (opyt monitoringa). Monografiya, 2015-386s.
15.
Allexsaht-Snider M., Bernier E. Schools as the unit of change: Principal roles in the support of parental involvement in mathematics reform //NCTM Research Presession. Retrieved from http://mathandparents. math. arizona. edu/research. html. Accessed. 2016. T. 12.
16.
Benner A. D., Boyle A. E., Sadler S. Parental involvement and adolescents educational success: The roles of prior achievement and socioeconomic status //Journal of youth and adolescence. 2016. T. 45. . 6. S. 1053-1064.
17.
Efevbera Y. et al. Integrating early child development and violence prevention programs: a systematic review //New directions for child and adolescent development. 2018. T. 2018. . 159. S. 27-54.
18.
Goodall J., Montgomery C. Parental involvement to parental engagement: a continuum //Educational Review. 2014. T. 66. . 4. S. 399-410.
19.
Topping K., Wolfendale S. Parental involvement in children's reading. Routledge, 2017.
20.
Wilder S. Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: a meta-synthesis //Educational Review. 2014. T. 66. . 3. S. 377-397.
21.
https://minobrnauki.rf/static/pdf/PG_statistika_god_2016.pdf
22.
https://xn--80abucjiibhv9a.xn--p1ai/media/events/files/%D0%9F%D0%93%20%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%20%D0%B7%D0%B0%20%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%B5%202017.docx